| Literature DB >> 35885635 |
Christos Chatzakis1, Alexandros Sotiriadis1, Ioannis G Fatouros2, Athanasios Z Jamurtas2, Chariklia K Deli2, Maria Papagianni2, Konstantinos Dinas1, George Mastorakos3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with aggravated oxidation capacity and utero-placental circulation, while aerobic exercise could improve both. The study aims to assess oxidation capacity and utero-placental circulation before and after a bout of aerobic exercise in GDM and uncomplicated pregnancies.;Entities:
Keywords: exercise bout; gestational diabetes mellitus; oxidation capacity; utero-placental circulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35885635 PMCID: PMC9322693 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Anthropometric and pregnancy characteristics in women with GDM and women with uncomplicated pregnancies (control group). Self-reported exercise (light/moderate, at least for 30 min and 2 times/week). Quantitative variables are expressed in mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups were performed with Student’s t-test. Qualitative data are presented in percentages. Comparisons between groups were performed with Chi-square test.
| Variable | GDM (N = 25) | Controls (N = 25) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 32.4 (4.0) | 30.4 (6.2) | 0.222 | |
| 32 (2.5) | 31 (3.2) | 0.186 | |
| 27.3 (7.9) | 25.1 (5.2) | 0.220 | |
| 30 (5.7) | 28.6 (5.0) | 0.325 | |
| 8.2 (7.5) | 10.7 (6.0) | 0.261 | |
|
| |||
| Para I [n (%)] | 17 (68%) | 15 (60%) | 0.452 |
| Para II [n (%)] | 5 (20%) | 6 (24%) | |
| Para III [n (%)] | 2 (8%) | 2 (8%) | |
| Para IV [n (%)] | 0 | 2 (8%) | |
| Para VIII [n (%)] | 1 (4%) | 0 | |
| 4 (16%) | 0 | 0.043 | |
| 25 (100%) | 25 (100%) | 1.0 | |
| 10 (40%) | 10 (40%) | 1.0 | |
Figure 1Inclusion Algorythm.
Total antioxidant Capacity (TAC), Catalase activity (CAT) and Reduced Glutathione (GH) in women with GDM and in women with uncomplicated pregnancies (control group), prior-to, immediately after and one hour after the exercise.
| TAC (μmol/mL) | CAT (U/mg Hb) | GSH (μmol/g Hb) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM | Controls | GDM | Controls | GDM | Controls | |
|
| 0.75 ± 0.09 | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 208.8 ± 53.2 | 274.5 ± 54.8 * | 1.73 ± 1.08 | 1.91 ± 0.87 |
|
| 0.86 ± 0.11 † | 0.90 ± 0.11 † | 245.5 ± 63.3 † | 341.5 ± 59.3 † | 0.97 ± 0.62 † | 1.32 ± 0.48 † |
|
| 0.75 ± 0.07 | 0.77 ± 0.11 | 241.4 ± 87.6 | 294.1 ± 51.2 * | 1.27 ± 0.59 # | 1.54 ± 1.04 *,# |
Data are expressed in mean ± SD. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA; Bonferroni correction was employed as post hoc test. The asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference between the two groups (women with GDM compared to women with uncomplicated pregnancies (p < 0.05)). The dagger (†) indicated a statistically significant difference within the groups (between prior-to and immediately after the exercise (p < 0.001)) and the hashtag (#) indicates a statistically significant difference within the groups (between prior-to and one hour after the exercise (p < 0.05)).
Uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI) centiles and Umbilical artery (UmA) pulsatility Index (PI) centiles in women with GDM and women with uncomplicated pregnancies (control group), prior-to, immediately after and one hour after the exercise bout.
| UtA PI Centiles | UmA PI Centiles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM Group | Control Group | GDM Group | Control Group | |
|
| 42.8 ± 29.9 | 53.1 ± 30.3 | 47.0 ± 26.9 | 44.5± 29.4 |
|
| 26.6 ± 22.7 † | 56.7 ± 27.0 * | 44.3 ± 30.7 | 43.5 ± 31.9 |
|
| 26.8 ± 24.1 # | 50.9 ± 26.9 * | 42.0 ± 34.5 | 52.7 ± 32.6 |
Data are expressed in mean ± SD. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Data were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA; Bonferroni correction was employed as post hoc test. The asterisk (*) indicates a statistically significant difference between the two groups (women with GDM compared to women with uncomplicated pregnancies (p < 0.01)). The dagger (†) indicated a statistically significant difference within the groups (between prior-to and immediately after the exercise (p < 0.05)), and the hashtag (#) indicates a statistically significant difference within the groups (between prior-to and one hour after the exercise (p < 0.01)).