| Literature DB >> 35885406 |
Li Tian1, Zhaodi Ma1, Hao Qiu1, Xiaotian Liu1, Tao Wu1, Feng Ge1, Rui Liu1, Jing Zhu1, Liang Shi1, Ailiang Jiang1, Hanshou Yu1, Ang Ren1,2.
Abstract
Lysine content is considered an important indicator of the quality of Flammulina filiformis. In this study, chitosan was used to improve lysine content of F. filiformis. Optimal design conditions were obtained using central combination design (CCD): treatment concentration was 14.61 μg/mL, treatment time was 52.90 h, and the theoretical value of lysine content was 30.95 mg/g. We used Basic Local Alignment Search Tool Protein (BLASTP) to search the F. filiformis genome database using known AATs in the NCBI database. There were 11 members of AAT in F. filiformis. The expression levels of AAT3 and AAT4 genes increased significantly with chitosan treatment. Subsequently, AAT3 and AAT4 silencing strains were constructed using RNAi technology. The lysine content of the wild-type (WT) strain treated with chitosan increased by 26.41%. Compared with the chitosan-induced WT strain, chitosan-induced lysine content decreased by approximately 24.87% in the AAT3 silencing strain, and chitosan-induced lysine content in the AAT4 silencing strain increased by approximately 13.55%. The results indicate that AAT3 and AAT4 are involved in the regulation of the biosynthesis of lysine induced by chitosan in F. filiformis. AAT3 may participate in the absorption of lysine, and AAT4 may be involved in the excretion of lysine with chitosan treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Flammulina filiformis; amino acid transporter; chitosan; lysine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35885406 PMCID: PMC9325215 DOI: 10.3390/foods11142163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Effects of chitosan on (A) lysine, (B) protein and (C) biomass of F. filiformis mycelium. All calculated results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and different English letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Effects of chitosan treatment of different durations on (A) lysine, (B) protein and (C) biomass of F. filiformis mycelium. All the calculated results are expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation, while different English letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05).
Design matrix of CCD.
| Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Response 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run | A: Time (h) | B: Concentration (μg/mL) | Lysine Content (mg/g DW) |
| 1 | 81.94 | 25.61 | 26.77 |
| 2 | 0.00 | 15.00 | 27.38 |
| 3 | 14.06 | 25.61 | 25.67 |
| 4 | 48.00 | 0.00 | 27.76 |
| 5 | 81.94 | 4.39 | 25.92 |
| 6 | 48.00 | 15.00 | 30.88 |
| 7 | 48.00 | 15.00 | 30.89 |
| 8 | 14.06 | 4.39 | 25.77 |
| 9 | 48.00 | 30.00 | 26.92 |
| 10 | 14.06 | 25.61 | 25.43 |
| 11 | 0.00 | 15.00 | 27.58 |
| 12 | 96.00 | 15.00 | 29.65 |
| 13 | 48.00 | 30.00 | 26.14 |
| 14 | 48.00 | 0.00 | 27.94 |
| 15 | 14.06 | 4.39 | 25.66 |
| 16 | 81.94 | 25.61 | 26.39 |
| 17 | 48.00 | 15.00 | 30.98 |
| 18 | 81.94 | 4.39 | 25.86 |
| 19 | 48.00 | 15.00 | 30.79 |
| 20 | 96.00 | 15.00 | 29.16 |
| 21 | 48.00 | 15.00 | 31 |
Note: There are 21 experimental combinations in this design. Each experiment was repeated three times to calculate the average lysine content of F. filiformis. The results were analyzed by second-order polynomial regression.
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of Squares | DF | Mean Squares | F Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 69.77 | 5 | 13.95 | 12.47 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 16.78 | 15 | 1.12 | ||
| Lack of fit | 16.18 | 3 | 5.39 | 108.24 | <0.0001 |
| Pure error | 0.60 | 12 | 0.050 | ||
| Cor total | 86.55 | 20 |
The least-squares fit and coefficient estimate.
| Factor | Coefficient Estimate | Standard | %95 CI | %95 CI | F Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 30.91 | 0.46 | 29.90 | 31.92 | ||
| A-Time | 0.49 | 0.26 | −0.073 | 1.05 | 3.45 | 0.0831 |
| B-Concentration | −0.17 | 0.26 | −0.73 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.5354 |
| AB | 0.21 | 0.37 | −0.58 | 1.01 | 0.33 | 0.5760 |
| A2 | −1.70 | 0.32 | −2.41 | −1.00 | 26.78 | 0.0001 |
| B2 | −2.33 | 0.32 | −3.03 | −1.63 | 50.08 | <0.0001 |
Note: A refers to time. B refers to concentration.
Figure 3Optimization of lysine accumulation conditions induced by chitosan in (A) A five-level two-factor center combination design is used to maximize the lysine content of F. filiformis. The independent variables are chitosan treatment concentration and treatment time. Table 1 shows the range and level of the independent variables. The levels of the variables are determined based on single factor analysis. (B) Contour plots reflect the combined effects of concentration and treatment time on lysine content in F. filiformis. (C) Normal probability plot of standardized residuals. Each color block is a response value.
Figure 4Fruiting body growth of F. filiformis treated with chitosan.
Effects of different concentrations of chitosan on lysine content and growth rate in fruiting bodies of F. filiformis.
| Chitosan Concentration | Average Lysine Content (mg/g) | Lysine Content Increase Ratio (%) | Average Growth Length (cm) | Growth Length Increase Ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 9.58 ± 0.31 c | - | 13.06 ± 0.25 c | - |
| 10 μg/mL | 10.46 ± 0.15 b | 9.19 | 14.48 ± 0.19 b | 10.87 |
| 14.61 μg/mL | 11.05 ± 0.23 a | 15.34 | 16.11 ± 0.11 a | 23.35 |
| 20 μg/mL | 9.61 ± 0.26 c | 0.31 | 12.93 ± 0.18 d | −1.00 |
| 30 μg/mL | 8.57 ± 0.29 d | −10.54 | 11.80 ± 0.16 e | −9.65 |
Note: Different letters in the table indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Gene screening of amino acid transporters treated with chitosan. The transcriptional levels of each AAT gene in WT strain were detected after chitosan treatment. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and the asterisk indicates that there was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group, * p < 0.01.
Figure 6Construction and screening of AAT3-silenced and AAT4-silenced strains. (A) Construction of the AAT3 and AAT4 RNAi expression cassette plasmids. The AAT3 and AAT4 fragments were double-digested with the restriction enzymes KpnI and SpeI, then inserted into the pAN7-dual plasmid. In the plasmid, URA3 transcription is driven by the 35S promoter, and the AAT gene is driven by the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter. (B) QRT-PCR analysis of the expression of AAT in the tested strains. The expression levels of the AAT3 and AAT4 genes in the WT strains were arbitrarily set to 1. The values are the mean ± standard deviations (SD) of the results of three independent experiments. The asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the untreated strains (Student’s t-test: ** p <0.01).
Figure 7AAT3 and AAT4 were involved in the biosynthesis of lysine in F. filiformis with chitosan treatment. Lysine content in F. filiformis treated with chitosan was determined. The calculation results are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and different letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05).