| Literature DB >> 35885368 |
María Eugenia Orqueda1,2, Sebastian Torres1,2,3, Iris Catiana Zampini1,2,3, María Inés Isla1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Ziziphus mistol fruit (vulgar name mistol) is used in northwestern Argentina in traditional food and beverage preparations and popular medicines for liver and respiratory disorders. AIMS: The aim of this research was to evaluate the hypoglycemic and anti-inflammatory activity in pulp powders and sub-products (skin and seeds) of mistol fruit, along with their toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: Ziziphus mistol; anti-inflammatory effect; by-products powders; hypoglycemic effect; pulp powders
Year: 2022 PMID: 35885368 PMCID: PMC9322840 DOI: 10.3390/foods11142125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Mistol distribution map in South America.
Figure 2Glucose adsorption capacity (determined by measuring the mM of glucose in dialysate) of digested and undigested mistol powders. Values are presented as mean ± SEM and scrutinized by 1 or 2-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey or LSD test using R studio software. Different letters on the bars indicate significant differences between the three parts of the fruit, evaluated according to Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05). No significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed between digested and undigested powders.
Figure 3Effect of different amounts (0.25 g, ▲; 0.5 g, ●; and 1.0 g, ■) of mistol powders on glucose diffusion: (A) seed, (B) pulp, and (B,C) skin powders. Results are expressed as the mean of three independent tests with SEM. The symbol * at a given time indicates significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the glucose content in the dialysate between the three amounts of mistol powder, according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 4Effect of mistol extracts (PEE) on glucose consumption by S. cerevisiae: Skin (■), pulp (●), and seed (▲) PEE. Results are expressed as the mean of three independent tests with SEM. The symbol * at a given extract concentration indicates significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between percentage of improvement in glucose intake by yeast cells between the three parts of mistol fruits, according to Tukey’s test.
Inhibitory activity of pro-inflammatory enzymes by extracts (PEE) of Z. mistol.
| Sample | Inhibition (%) (100 μg GAE/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| sPLA2 | LOX | COX-2 | |
| Seeds | NI | 89.8 ± 2.3 a | 91.0 ± 0.9 c |
| Pulp | 46.0 ± 1.2 b | 83.0 ± 1.0 b | 96.0 ± 2.6 b |
| Skin | 25.0 ± 0.6 c | 65.1 ± 0.6 c | 68.5 ± 1.5 d |
| Naproxen | 95.00 ± 2.80 a | - | - |
| Indomethacin | - | 16.00 ± 0.80 d | |
| Nimesulide | - | - | 100.0 ± 5.0 a |
sPLA2: phospholipase A2; LOX: lipooxygenase; COX-2: cyclooxygenase-2. Values are expressed as percent inhibition at a fixed concentration of 100 µg GAE/mL for extract samples and 50 µg GAE/mL for naproxen, indomethacin, and nimesulide (positive controls). Results are expressed as the mean of three independent tests with SEM. NI: No inhibition shown in the concentration tested. (-): Not assayed (each standard compound was tested for a specific enzyme). Different letters in the same column show significant differences between each part of the fruit, according to Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05).
Mutagenic activity of extracts (PEE) of the three parts of the Z. mistol fruit assayed in Salmonella strains.
| Sample | μg GAE/Plate | N° Revertants/Plate | MR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA98 | TA100 | TA98 | TA100 | ||
| Seeds | 175 | 104 ± 17 b | 30 ± 7 b | 0.79 | 1.00 |
| 250 | 110 ± 5 b | 35 ± 2 b | 0.83 | 1.16 | |
| 500 | 110 ± 1 b | 45 ± 4 b | 0.83 | 1.50 | |
| Pulp | 175 | 100 ± 5 b | 16 ± 2 b | 0.76 | 0.53 |
| 250 | 112 ± 12 b | 13 ± 1 b | 0.85 | 0.43 | |
| 500 | 121 ± 20 b | 20 ± 3 b | 0.92 | 0.64 | |
| Skin | 175 | 99 ± 13 b | 19 ± 2 b | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| 250 | 112 ± 5 b | 25 ± 5 b | 0.85 | 0.83 | |
| 500 | 136 ± 11 b | 28 ± 2 b | 1.03 | 0.93 | |
| Negative control (DMSO) | 131 ± 37 b | 30 ± 6 b | |||
| Positive control (4-NPD) | 2861 ± 114 a | 1998 ± 38 a | |||
μg GAE/plate: μg of gallic acid equivalents/plate. MR: Mutagenicity Ratio. DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide. 4-NPD: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine at a concentration of 10 μg/plate. The results correspond to mean values between triplicates of two independent tests. Different letters in the same column show significant differences between each part of the fruit, according to Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05).