| Literature DB >> 32072065 |
María Eugenia Orqueda1, Sebastian Torres1,2, Iris Catiana Zampini1,2, Florencia Cattaneo2, Agustina Fernandez Di Pardo3, Estela M Valle3, Felipe Jiménez-Aspee4, Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann4, María Inés Isla1,2.
Abstract
The "red chilto" (Solanum betaceum Cav) is a native fruit from the Yungas forest of Argentina. Red chilto is a neglected and underutilized native species (NUS). The objective of this work was to evaluate the potentiality of pulp, seed and skin from "red chilto" as a functional food ingredient to add value to a native resource of Argentine Yungas to promote sustainable integral use of it. The powders have low carbohydrate and sodium content and are a source of vitamin C, phenolic acids (rosmarinic acid and caffeoylquinic acid), anthocyanins, condensed tannins, carotenoids, potassium, and fiber. The phenolics of chilto powders showed, before and after simulated gastroduodenal digestion, antioxidant activity (ABTS•+; H2O2; O2 •; HO•) and were able to inhibit enzymes related to metabolic syndrome, such as α-glucosidase, α-amylase and lipase. Chilto powder showed hypoglycemic effect by increasing glucose adsorption, decreasing glucose diffusion rate and by promoting glucose transport across the cell membrane. These results suggest the potential of Argentinean "red chilto" fruits as functional food ingredients or dietary supplements to prevent metabolic syndrome principally by its antioxidant, hypoglycemic and hypolipemic effects.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Food science; Hypoglycemic; Metabolic syndrome; Powder; Red chilto fruit; Solanum betaceum
Year: 2020 PMID: 32072065 PMCID: PMC7013136 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1I) Red chilto fruit; II) (A)Seed; (B) pulp and (C) skin powder; III) Scanning electron micrographs of (A) seed powder; (B) pulp powder and (C) skin powder.
Metabolic profile of red Solanum betaceum fresh fruits by 1H-NMR spectrometry and CIELAB parameters.
| Metabolites | g/100 g fresh weight |
|---|---|
| D-fructose | 0.99 ± 0.27 |
| D-glucose | 0.73 ± 0.14 |
| Sucrose | 0.66 ± 0.20 |
| Gamma-aminobutyric acid | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
| L-alanine | 0.01 ± 0.001 |
| L-asparagine | 0.17 ± 0.09 |
| L-aspartic_acid | 0.14 ± 0.09 |
| Citric acid | 2.67 ± 0.54 |
| L-malic_acid | 0.48 ± 0.13 |
| Alpha-ketoglutaric_acid | 0.17 ± 0.12 |
| Ethanol | 0.05 ± 0.002 |
| Methanol | 0.10 ± 0.007 |
|
| |
| CIELAB parameters of colour | |
| L* | 36.51 ± 2.54 |
| a* | 25.66 ± 1.33 |
| b* | 11.74 ± 1.82 |
| hue angle | 22.97 |
| Chroma | 27.26 |
| CIRG index | 2.46 |
| Sweetness index | 28.97 |
| Total acidity | 0.9 |
| SSC | 9.20% ± 0.2 |
Macronutrient and micronutrient content of seed, pulp and skin powder of Argentinean red Solanum betaceum.
| Nutrients and mineral content in 100 g powder | Skin | Pulp | Seeds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soluble total sugar (g GE) | 8.9 ± 0.4a | 10.5 ± 1.8a | 20.5 ± 1.2b |
| Glucose (g GE)* | 0.6 ± 0.01a | 0.91 ± 0.03b | 0.99 ± 0.06b |
| Fructose (g GE)* | 1.23 ± 0.5a | 1.65 ± 0.52a | 3.96 ± 0.2b |
| Sucrose (g GE)* | 4.23 ± 0.9a | 7.23 ± 0.5b | 8.52 ± 0.3b |
| Digerible starch (mg) | 6.53 ± 0.5a | 18.49 ± 0.2b | 22.52 ± 1.2c |
| Resistant starch (mg) | ND | 3.47 ± 0.60 | ND |
| Total protein (g) | 10.51 ± 0,6a | 11.2 ± 0.3a | 21.9 ± 0.2b |
| Soluble protein (g AE)** | 0.09 ± 0.01b | 0.05 ± 0.008a | 0.5 ± 0.01c |
| Fat (g) | 0.8 ± 0.1c | 0.2 ± 0.03a | 0.42 ± 0.03b |
| Total fiber (g) | 23.2 ± 2.0a | 20.8 ± 1.8a | 29.5 ± 1.2b |
| Dietary soluble fiber (g) | 9.72 ± 0.2b | 9.03 ± 0.2b | 5.59 ± 0.1a |
| Minerals (mg/100 g) | |||
| Na | 1.2 ± 0.1 | ND | ND |
| Mg | 90.4 ± 2.0b | 76.4 ± 0.5a | 131.8 ± 3.5c |
| K | 2725.6 ± 69.0b | 1234.2 ± 26.7a | 1234.2 ± 26.7a |
| Ca | 212.9 ± 6.0c | 105.7 ± 1.9b | 56.5 ± 3.5a |
| Fe | 3.4 ± 0.05b | ND | 5.8 ± 0.06a |
| Cu | 3.74 ± 0.008b | 0.81 ± 0.02a | 0.90 ± 0.03a |
| Zn | 0.46 ± 0.04a | 1.20 ± 0.06b | 1.61 ± 0.04b |
bdl: below detection limit. Different letters (a, b, c, d) in the same line show significant differences in the macro and micronutrient content among each part of the fruit (skin, pulp and seeds), according to Tukey's multiple comparison (p ≤ 0.05). *GE: Glucose equivalent; **AE: Albumin equivalent; ND: no detected.
Figure 2Phenolic compounds profile of red chilto skin polyphenolic extracts. Caffeoylquinic acid RT 27.1 min; Rosmarinic acid RT 60.1 min.
Phytochemical content of seed, pulp and skin powder of Solanum betaceum fruits (red variety).
| Phytochemical content | Skin | Pulp | Seeds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total phenolic (mg GAE) | 408.9 ± 2.3b | 334.0 ± 1.2a | 623.6 ± 1.6c |
| Flavone and flavonol (mg QE) | 195.3 ± 3.6c | 123.3 ± 0.9a | 180.5 ± 2.0b |
| Condensed tannins (mg procyanidin B2) | 75.7 ± 1.3b | 18.9 ± 1.2a | 265.0 ± 3.5c |
| Hydrolyzable tannins (mg GAE) | ND | ND | ND |
| Anthocyanins (mg C-3GE) | 62.5 ± 0.5b | 10.6 ± 0.6a | 65.23 ± 0.9b |
| Carotenoids (g β carotene) | ND | 0.9 ± 0.08 | ND |
| Ascorbic acid (mg) | 43.5 ± 2.5a | 75.9 ± 2.0b | 45.2 ± 0.6a |
| %Yield (g powder/100 g fruit part) | 26.0 ± 0.8b | 20.4 ± 0.5a | 25.9 ± 1.5b |
Different letters (a, b, c, d) in the same line show significant differences in the phytochemical content among each part of the fruit (skin, pulp and seeds), according to Tukey's multiple comparison (p ≤ 0.05). ND: no detected. GAE: Gallic acid equivalent; QE: Quercetin equivalent; C-3GE: Cyanidin-3 glucoside equivalent.
Figure 3Glucose adsorption capacity of digested and undigested chilto powders. CR D: red chilto digested powders. CR UD: red chilto undigested powders.
Figure 4Effect of different amount of chilto powders on glucose diffusion: (A) Seed; (B) Pulp (B) and (C) Skin powders 0.25 g; 0.5 g and 1.0 g. (D) comparative effect on glucose difussion of 0.25 g powders with control ; seed ; pulp ; and skin . The symbol (*) indicates significant differences between seed and pulp extracts compared to skin extracts at a given time.
Figure 5I. Effect of S. betaceum extracts on uptake of glucose by S. cerevisiae seed; pulp; skin. II. Scanning electron micrographs of (A) control yeast, (B) yeast treated with seed extract, (C) yeast with glucose, (D)yeast treated with polyphenolic enriched extract + glucose.
Effect of phenolic-enriched extract (PEE) of Argentinean Solanum betaceum red fruit powder (seed, pulp and skin) before and after simulated gastroduodenal digestion (GD) on enzymes related to carbohydrate and fat metabolism and oxidative processes. Reference compounds are included for comparison.
| Enzyme IC50 (μg GAE/mL) | IC50 (μg GAE/mL) | SC50 (μg GAE/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α amylase | α glucosidase | Lipase | AAPH | ABTS | O2.- | HO• | H2O2 | NO | |
| Seeds | |||||||||
| Before GD | 50.0 ± 2.3a | 25.0 ± 1.2a | 4.5 ± 0.3a | 1.2 ± 0.05a | 4.5 ± 0.5ab | 22.1 ± 0.5a | 8.5 ± 0.06c | 5.8 ± 0.5a | 17.1 ± 0.6a |
| Pulp | |||||||||
| Before GD | 115.1 ± 2.1b | 42.3 ± 0.3b | 4.7 ± 0.9a | 1.0 ± 0.03a | 5.7 ± 0.6b | 74.0 ± 1.3b | 5.6 ± 0.1b | 14.6 ± 0.05b | 44.0 ± 3.2b |
| Skin | |||||||||
| Before GD | 118.2 ± 2.6b | 76.0 ± 0.9c | 6.8 ± 0.3b | 2.6 ± 0.04b | 3.4 ± 0.3a | 66.0 ± 0.6b | 4.2 ± 0.09a | 20.6 ± 0.2c | 22.0 ± 2.1a |
| Reference compound | Acarbose | Acarbose | Orlistat | Quercetin | BHT | Quercetin | Quercetin | Quercetin | Ascorbic acid |
| IC50 | 1.25 ± 0.10 | 25.00 ± 1.00 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 60.50 ± 4.70 | 30.00 ± 2.00 | 17.30 ± 0.50 | 37.19 ± 0.33 |
IC50: Concentration of polyphenolic extract necessary to inhibit 50% of oxidative hemolysis or enzyme activity; SC50: Concentration of PEE necessary to scavenge 50% of ABTS, O2.-, HO•, H2O2, NO; GAE: Gallic acid equivalent; PEE: phenolic enriched extract. Different letters (a, b, c or A, B, C) in the same column in each assay show significant differences among effect of polyphenols on enzyme activity or antioxidant activity according to Tukey's test (p ≤ 0.05).
Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between total phenolic concentration and functional activities of seeds, pulp, and skin extracts. p-Value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Bioactivity | Seeds | Pulp | Skin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson's coefficient | Pearson's coefficient | Pearson's coefficient | ||||
| α-amylase inhibition | 0.84 | 0.1586 | 0.85 | 0.1470 | 0.89 | 0.1078 |
| α-glucosidase inhibition | 0.96 | 0.0380 | 1.00 | 0.0026 | 0.92 | 0.0784 |
| Lipase inhibition | 0.98 | 0.0248 | 0.97 | 0.0273 | 0.90 | 0.0994 |
| AAPH | 0.95 | 0.0040 | 0.64 | 0.1748 | 0.75 | 0.0842 |
| ABTS | 0.99 | 0.0133 | 0.88 | 0.1166 | 1.00 | 0.0015 |
| O2▪ | 0.99 | 0.0096 | 0.96 | 0.0363 | 1.00 | 0.0038 |
| H2O2 | 0.99 | 0.0095 | 0.91 | 0.0863 | 0.98 | 0.0174 |
| HO▪ | 0.97 | 0.0260 | 1.00 | 0.0001 | 0.95 | 0.0455 |
| NO▪ | 0.96 | 0.0412 | 0.96 | 0.0445 | 0.91 | 0.0896 |