| Literature DB >> 35885337 |
Barbara Tomadoni1, María José Fabra2,3, Daniel Alexander Méndez2,4, Antonio Martínez-Abad2,3, Amparo López-Rubio2,3.
Abstract
Electrosprayed agar nanocapsules were developed using an acetic acid solution as solvent. The role of solution properties (viscosity, surface tension, and conductivity) in the formation of agar particles was assessed, together with the effect of both agar and acetic acid concentrations on the size and morphology of the resulting particles. Agar solutions with a concentration below 10% w/v were not suitable for electrospraying. Furthermore, the agar-acetic acid ratio was also critical for the formation of agar nanostructures (with an optimum ratio of 1:2). A decrease in particle size was also observed when decreasing agar concentration, with particle diameter values ranging between 50 and 400 nm. Moreover, the suitability of the electrosprayed agar nanocapsules as carriers for a model bioactive compound, chlorophyllin sodium copper salt (CHL), was also evaluated. The release profile of encapsulated CHL, with an estimated encapsulation efficiency of around 40%, was carried out in food simulants with different hydrophilicity (10% v/v and 50% v/v ethanol). While the release of the bioactive was negligible in the hydrophilic food simulant, an initial burst release followed by a slower sustained release was observed when the capsules were immersed in 50% ethanol solution. The results open up a broad range of possibilities that deserve further exploration related to the use of these edible polysaccharide-based nanocapsules.Entities:
Keywords: agar; chlorophyllin; electrospraying; nanocapsules
Year: 2022 PMID: 35885337 PMCID: PMC9319333 DOI: 10.3390/foods11142093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Gelling and electrosprayability of different agar solutions.
| Sample | Agar (% | Acetic Acid (% | Citric Acid (% | Gelling at Room Temperature | Electrosprayability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.5 | 20 | 0 | non-gelling | − |
|
| 5 | 20 | 0 | non-gelling | − |
|
| 10 | 20 | 0 | non-gelling | + |
|
| 15 | 20 | 0 | gel | − − |
|
| 20 | 20 | 0 | gel | − − |
|
| 20 | 0 | 20 | non-gelling | − |
+: electrosprayable biopolymer solution. −: unstable biopolymer jet. − −: not tested for electrosprayability (gelled at room temperature).
Properties of the different acetic acid agar solutions.
|
| pH | Electrical Conductivity (µS) | Surface Tension (mN/m) | Electrosprayability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.45 ± 0.02 a | 1469 ± 9 ab | 39.2 ± 0.6 a | + |
|
| 2.37 ± 0.03 b | 1481 ± 34 a | 39.0 ± 1.1 a | + |
|
| 2.31 ± 0.03 c | 1521 ± 147 a | 39.2 ± 0.8 a | + |
|
| 2.22 ± 0.01 d | 1335 ± 44 b | 37.1 ± 1.3 a | + |
|
| 2.07 ± 0.02 e | 1118 ± 16 c | 36.9 ± 2.7 a | − |
Mean values ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05). +: electrosprayable biopolymer solution. −: unstable biopolymer jet.
Figure 1SEM images of the agar structures obtained through electrospraying from different agar and acetic acid concentration (left) and particle size distributions for the electrosprayed samples (right) obtained from measurements of 200 capsules. Scale bars in SEM images correspond to 5 µm.
Figure 2CHL stability test in fresh acetic acid solutions (up) and stored at 40 °C, for 1 week (down). From left to right: acetic acid 20% v/v (HAc20%), agar 10% w/v in acetic acid 20% v/v (Agar10%HAc20%), acetic acid 40% v/v (HAc40%), and agar 20% w/v in acetic acid 40% v/v (Agar20%HAc40%).
Figure 3Electrosprayed agar nanocapsules loaded with 5 wt.% CHL of the agar content (scale bar corresponds to 4 μm).
Figure 4Chlorophyllin (CHL) release from electrosprayed agar nanocapsules in 50% ethanol.