Literature DB >> 32625776

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the organic acids lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses and pork cuts.

Vittorio Silano, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Beat Johannes Brüschweiler, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Evgenia Lampi, Gilles Riviere, Inger-Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover-Cid, Joop de Knecht, Luisa Peixe, Panagotis Skandamis, Andrea Baù, Carla Martino, Winy Messens, Eleonora Sarno, Daniela Tomcikova, Alicja Mortensen.   

Abstract

Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of lactic and acetic acids to reduce microbiological surface contamination on pork carcasses pre-chill and pork meat cuts post-chill were assessed. Lactic acid treatments consisted of 2-5% solutions at temperatures of up to 80°C applied to carcasses by spraying or up to 55°C applied on cuts by spraying or dipping. Acetic acid treatments consisted of 2-4% solutions at temperatures of up to 40°C applied on carcasses by spraying or on cuts by spraying or dipping. The maximum treatment duration was 30 s. The Panel concluded that: [1] the treatments are of no safety concern, provided that the substances comply with the European Union specifications for food additives; [2] spraying of pork carcasses pre-chill with lactic acid was efficacious compared to untreated control, but based on the available data, the Panel could not conclude whether lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment when spraying of pork carcasses pre-chill or pork meat cuts post-chill. The Panel concluded that dipping of pork meat cuts post-chill in lactic acid was more efficacious than water treatment. However, it could not conclude on the efficacy of acetic acid treatment of pork carcasses pre-chill and/or pork meat cuts post-chill; [3] the potential selection and emergence of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to biocides and/or resistance to therapeutic antimicrobials linked to the use of the substances is unlikely as long as Good Hygienic Practices are implemented; and [4] the release of both organic acids is not of concern for the environment, assuming that wastewaters released by the slaughterhouses are treated, if necessary, to counter the potentially low pH caused by lactic or acetic acid, in compliance with local rules.
© 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetic acid; antimicrobial resistance; efficacy; environmental impact; lactic acid; pork carcasses and cuts; toxicological safety

Year:  2018        PMID: 32625776      PMCID: PMC7009387          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  6 in total

1.  Safety evaluation of buffered vinegar as a food additive.

Authors:  Maged Younes; Gabriele Aquilina; Gisela Degen; Karl-Heinz Engel; Paul J Fowler; Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez; Peter Fürst; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Rainer Gürtler; Trine Husøy; Melania Manco; Wim Mennes; Peter Moldeus; Sabina Passamonti; Romina Shah; Ine Waalkens-Berendsen; Matthew Wright; José Manuel Barat Baviera; David Gott; Jean-Charles Leblanc; Detlef Wölfle; Laura Ruggeri; Camilla Smeraldi; Alexandra Tard; Giorgia Vianello; Laurence Castle
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of lactic acid to reduce microbiological surface contamination on carcases from kangaroos, wild pigs, goats and sheep.

Authors:  Claude Lambré; José Manuel Barat Baviera; Claudia Bolognesi; Andrew Chesson; Pier Sandro Cocconcelli; Riccardo Crebelli; David Michael Gott; Konrad Grob; Eugenia Lampi; Gilles Riviere; Inger-Lise Steffensen; Christina Tlustos; Henk Van Loveren; Laurence Vernis; Holger Zorn; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Joop de Knecht; Luisa Peixe; Panagotis Skandamis; Carla Martino; Winy Messens; Alexandra Tard; Alicja Mortensen
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of lactic acid produced by Weizmannia coagulans (synonym Bacillus coagulans) DSM 32789 for all animal species except for fish (Jungbunzlauer SA).

Authors:  Giovanna Azimonti; Vasileios Bampidis; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Henrik Christensen; Birgit Dusemund; Mojca Fašmon Durjava; Maryline Kouba; Marta López-Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Francesca Marcon; Baltasar Mayo; Alena Pechová; Mariana Petkova; Fernando Ramos; Yolanda Sanz; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Ruud Woutersen; Miguel Prieto Maradona; Montserrat Anguita; Jaume Galobart; Elisa Pettenati; Jordi Tarrés-Call
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interventions Applied during Primary Processing to Reduce Microbial Contamination on Pig Carcasses.

Authors:  Nevijo Zdolec; Aurelia Kotsiri; Kurt Houf; Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez; Bojan Blagojevic; Nedjeljko Karabasil; Morgane Salines; Dragan Antic
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-15

5.  Electrosprayed Agar Nanocapsules as Edible Carriers of Bioactive Compounds.

Authors:  Barbara Tomadoni; María José Fabra; Daniel Alexander Méndez; Antonio Martínez-Abad; Amparo López-Rubio
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acetic acid for all animal species.

Authors:  Vasileios Bampidis; Giovanna Azimonti; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Henrik Christensen; Birgit Dusemund; Mojca Fašmon Durjava; Maryline Kouba; Marta López-Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Francesca Marcon; Baltasar Mayo; Alena Pechová; Mariana Petkova; Fernando Ramos; Yolanda Sanz; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Ruud Woutersen; Rosella Brozzi; Jaume Galobart; Lucilla Gregoretti; Gloria López-Gálvez; Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti; Maria Vittoria Vettori
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.