| Literature DB >> 35883838 |
Roxana Banc1, Daniela-Saveta Popa2, Anamaria Cozma-Petruţ1, Lorena Filip1, Béla Kiss2, Anca Fărcaş3, Andras Nagy4, Doina Miere1, Felicia Loghin2.
Abstract
In recent years, it has been increasingly suggested that the consumption of natural polyphenols, in moderate amounts, is beneficial for health. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a red wine (the administered dose of 7 mL/kg/day being equivalent to ~16.5 mg/kg/day total polyphenols) compared to a white wine (the administered dose of 7 mL/kg/day being equivalent to ~1.7 mg/kg/day total polyphenols), on the prevention of acrylamide-induced subacute hepatic injury and oxidative stress in Wistar rats. Hepatic damage due to acrylamide intoxication (the administered dose being 250 µg/kg body weight, for 28 days, by intragastric gavage) was assessed by employing biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) and by histopathological studies. Markers of oxidative damage were measured in terms of plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), hepatic Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) and glutathione (GSH) levels, and liver antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx)) activities. Regarding hepatic enzyme activities, treatment with red wine significantly decreased the AST values (p < 0.05), while for the ALT values only a normalization tendency was observed. Treatment with red wine and white wine, respectively, significantly prevented the increase in MDA and TBARS levels (p < 0.05), as well as the depletion of GSH (p < 0.05). Red wine treatment normalized the activities of the antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD in rats intoxicated with acrylamide, while supplementing the diet with white wine did not produce significant differences in the antioxidant enzyme activities. Histopathological findings revealed a moderate protective effect of red wine after four weeks of daily consumption. Our findings provide evidence that red wine, having a higher phenolic content than white wine, has a significant protective effect on oxidative stress and liver injury induced by acrylamide in rats, through its antioxidative activity.Entities:
Keywords: acrylamide; antioxidant activity; hepatotoxicity; oxidative stress; polyphenols; rats; red wine; white wine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883838 PMCID: PMC9312107 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Total phenolic content (TPC), DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) and total antioxidant activity (TAA) of the two wine samples used in this study (mean value (n = 3)).
| White Wine Sample | TPC | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity (%) | TAA |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRJid2011 | 245 * | 51 * | 0.93 * |
| Red Wine Sample | TPC | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity (%) | TAA |
| FNToh2010 | 2359 * | 95 * | 9.84 * |
GAE: Gallic acid equivalents; TE: Trolox equivalents. * Data from Banc et al. [39].
Experimental design.
| Group | Number of Animals | Intragastric Gavage | Diet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (C) | 10 | 12.5% ( | standard |
| Positive control (PC) | 10 | 12.5% ( | standard |
| White wine (WW) | 10 | FRJid2011 white wine | standard |
| White wine + acrylamide (WW + ACR) | 10 | FRJid2011 white wine + acrylamide 250 µg/kg of weight, 1% ( | standard |
| Red wine (RW) | 10 | FNToh2010 red wine | standard |
| Red wine + acrylamide (RW + ACR) | 10 | FNToh2010 red wine+ acrylamide 250 µg/kg of weight, 1% ( | standard |
Figure 1The evolution of the average body weight of the animals from the 6 groups, during the entire experimental period. C−hydroalcoholic solution group; PC−hydroalcoholic solution + acrylamide group; WW−white wine group; WW + ACR−white wine + acrylamide group; RW−red wine group; RW + ACR−red wine + acrylamide group.
Effects of white/red wine on absolute liver weight and relative liver weight (% of body weight) of rats in the 6 experimental groups at the end of the experiment.
| Experimental Groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | PC | WW | WW + ACR | RW | RW + ACR | |
| Absolute liver weight (g) | 4.78 ± 0.15 a | 6.04 ± 0.17 b | 4.66 ± 0.18 a | 6.02 ± 0.15 b | 4.79 ± 0.17 a | 5.99 ± 0.03 b |
| Relative liver weight (%) | 2.58 ± 0.08 a | 3.15 ± 0.09 b | 2.39 ± 0.09 a | 2.94 ± 0.08 b | 2.46 ± 0.09 a | 2.82 ± 0.02 a,b |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). a,b Mean values not sharing the same superscript letter within a row are different at p < 0.05. C−hydroalcoholic solution group; PC−hydroalcoholic solution + acrylamide group; WW−white wine group; WW + ACR−white wine + acrylamide group; RW−red wine group; RW + ACR−red wine + acrylamide group.
Figure 2Hepatic histology in rats from different experimental groups (HE stain). Control group treated with 12.5% hydroalcoholic solution (A), showing perivascular lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate; Positive control group treated with 12.5% hydroalcoholic solution and acrylamide (B), presenting a focus of hepatic fibrosis and lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate; Group treated with Fetească Regală white wine (C), showing focal lymphohistiocytic infiltrate; Group treated with Fetească Regală white wine and acrylamide (D), showing large focus of hepatic fibrosis and lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate; Group treated with Fetească Neagră red wine (E), showing minimal lymphohistiocytic inflammatory cell infiltrate in the portal space; Group treated with Fetească Neagră red wine and acrylamide (F), presenting focus of fibrosis, minimal lymphohistiocytic inflammatory infiltrate.
Effects of white/red wine on aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels in the plasma of rats from the 6 experimental groups.
| Experimental Groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | PC | WW | WW + ACR | RW | RW + ACR | |
| AST (U/mL plasma) | 101.29 ± 4.96 | 162.06 ± 23.15 a | 116.31 ± 15.06 | 130 ± 12.29 | 105.17 ± 6.45 b | 108.3 ± 10.06 b |
| ALT (U/mL plasma) | 60.34 ± 9.71 | 88.93 ± 10.27 a | 52.93 ± 3.83 b | 70.77 ± 14.79 | 44.94 ± 5.56 b | 62.68 ± 11.61 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10). a There are significant differences when compared to the control group (C) at the significance level p < 0.05. b There are significant differences when compared to the positive control group (PC) at the significance level p < 0.05. AST−aspartate aminotransferase; ALT−alanine aminotransferase. C−hydroalcoholic solution group; PC−hydroalcoholic solution + acrylamide group; WW−white wine group; WW + ACR−white wine + acrylamide group; RW−red wine group; RW + ACR−red wine + acrylamide group.
Figure 3Effects of white/red wine on: total MDA plasma level (nmol/mL) (A), reduced GSH plasma level (nmol/mL) (B), and the reduced GSH/total GSH ratio (C) in rats from ACR-treated groups compared to untreated ones (n = 10). Bars marked with the same letter do not differ significantly (p < 0.05). C−hydroalcoholic solution group; PC−hydroalcoholic solution + acrylamide group; WW−white wine group; WW + ACR−white wine + acrylamide group; RW−red wine group; RW + ACR−red wine + acrylamide group.
Figure 4Effects of white/red wine on hepatic TBARS level (nmol/mg protein) (A) and reduced GSH hepatic level (nmol/mg protein) (B) in rats from ACR-treated groups compared to untreated ones (n = 10). Effects of white/red wine on superoxide dismutase activity (U/mg protein) (C), catalase activity (U/mg protein) (D), and glutathione peroxidase activity (U/mg protein) (E) in liver tissue of rats from ACR-treated groups compared to untreated ones (n = 10). Bars marked with the same letter do not differ significantly (p < 0.05). C−hydroalcoholic solution group; PC−hydroalcoholic solution + acrylamide group; WW−white wine group; WW + ACR−white wine + acrylamide group; RW−red wine group; RW + ACR−red wine + acrylamide group.