| Literature DB >> 35883741 |
Valeria Purpura1, Serena Benedetti2, Elena Bondioli1, Francesca Scarpellini3, Agnese Giacometti3, Maria Cristina Albertini2, Davide Melandri1.
Abstract
The biological properties of the human amniotic membrane (HAM) and its characteristic ability to be a reservoir of growth factors promoting wound healing make it an ideal biological dressing for the treatment of different clinical conditions, such as burns and non-healing wounds. However, the application of a preservation method on the HAM is required during banking to maintain biological tissue properties and to ensure the release overtime of protein content for its final clinical effectiveness after application on the wound bed. Although cryopreservation and freezing are methods widely used to maintain tissue properties, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced within tissue cellular components during their switching from frozen to thawed state. Consequently, these methods can lead to oxidative stress-induced cell injury, affecting tissue regenerative properties and its final clinical effectiveness. Taking advantage of the antioxidant activity of the natural compound quercetin, we used it to improve the antioxidant and regenerative properties of frozen or cryopreserved HAM tissues. In particular, we evaluated the oxidative damage (lipid peroxidation, malondialdehyde) as well as the regenerative/biological properties (bFGF growth factor release, wound healing closure, structure, and viability) of HAM tissue after its application. We identified the effectiveness of quercetin on both preservation methods to reduce oxidative damage, as well as its ability to enhance regenerative properties, while maintaining the unaltered structure and viability of HAM tissue. The use of quercetin described in this study appears able to counteract the side effects of cryopreservation and freezing methods related to oxidative stress, enhancing the regenerative properties of HAM. However, further investigations will need to be performed, starting from these promising results, to identify its beneficial effect when applied on burns or non-healing wounds.Entities:
Keywords: burns; cryopreservation; freezing; growth factors; lipid peroxidation; natural antioxidant compound; non-healing wounds; regenerative properties; wound treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883741 PMCID: PMC9311548 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1MDA levels in HAM-derived supernatants obtained immediately after thawing (T0) and after 3 days of HAM culture (T3). Control: supernatants from fresh not preserved HAM; CP-1: cryopreservation protocol 1; FP-2: freezing protocol 2; Q: quercetin. Data are represented as mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 between the indicated bars.
Figure 2Release of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) after 40 min from fresh HAM samples (Control) and thawed HAM, previously preserved with CP-1 or FP-2 in the presence (CP-1 + Q and FP-2 + Q) or not (CP-1 and FP-2) of quercetin. Data are expressed as fold change bFGF pg/mL related to control and are represented as mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 between the indicated bars.
Figure 3Percentage of fibroblast wound closure after 48 h treatment with supernatants derived from fresh not preserved HAM tissues (Control) or thawed HAM samples preserved with CP-1 or FP-2 in the presence (CP-1 + Q and FP-2 + Q) or not (CP-1 and FP-2) of quercetin. T0: supernatants collected after 40 min of HAM culture; T3: supernatants collected after 3 days of HAM culture. (A). Representative images used to evaluate the percentage of wound closure illustrated in (B). In the same figures, the initial wound (0 h) has been evidenced with dotted red lines while the wound after 48 h is indicated as a white area. The percentages of wound closure are represented as mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05 between the indicated bars.
Figure 4(A) Histological evaluation immediately after thawing of HAM preserved with cryopreservation protocol 1 (CP-1) (upper, central panel) or with CP-1 in the presence of quercetin (CP-1 + Q, upper right panel) and HAM preserved with freezing protocol 2 (FP-2) (lower, left panel) or with FP-2 in the presence of quercetin (FP-2 + Q, lower right panel). Untreated and not preserved HAM was used as control (upper, left panel). (B) MTT viability test on fresh not preserved HAM tissues (Control) and thawed HAM samples preserved with CP-1 or FP-2 in the presence (CP-1 + Q and FP-2 + Q) or not (CP-1 and FP-2) of quercetin. Data are represented as the mean of OD/gr ratio ± SD of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05 between the indicated bars.