| Literature DB >> 35883375 |
Shipeng Dong1,2, Dapeng Liu1,2, Boshan Zhu1,2, Liye Yu1,2, Hongwei Shan1, Fang Wang1,2.
Abstract
Individual growth models can form the basis of population dynamics assessment and ecosystem model construction. In order to provide a basic module for an ecosystem model of an integrated marine aquaculture pond, an individual growth model was constructed for kuruma shrimp (Penaeus japonicus) based on dynamic energy budget (DEB) theory. The model was first parameterized based on a covariation method using the Add-my-Pet (AmP) procedure. The parametric estimation model underestimated the ultimate abdominal length for female shrimp, and the predicted values of other zero-variate parameters were generally consistent with observed values. The relative errors of the predicted and observed values of the univariate data set within three geographical regions showed acceptable goodness of fit. Parameter estimation achieved an overall goodness of fit with a mean relative error of 0.048 and a symmetric mean squared error of 0.066. A DEB model was constructed using the estimated parameters, and the goodness-of-fit indicators (R square, mean bias and absolute and relative root mean square error) showed that the model was able to reproduce the growth of kuruma shrimp in terms of total length and wet weight with high accuracy. The results provide data to support the subsequent development of integrated aquaculture management at the ecosystem level.Entities:
Keywords: Add-my-Pet; DEB theory; Penaeus japonicus; individual growth model; integrated marine pond aquaculture
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883375 PMCID: PMC9311514 DOI: 10.3390/ani12141828
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Equations describing the energy fluxes in the standard DEB model for kuruma shrimp.
| Definition | Equation |
|---|---|
| Temperature dependence |
|
| Assimilation rate |
|
| Catabolic rate |
|
| Maintenance rate |
|
| Maturity maintenance rate |
|
| Reserve dynamics |
|
| Reproductive reserve dynamics |
|
| Biovolume growth |
|
| Volume |
|
| Total length |
|
| Wet weight |
|
Figure 1Schematic representation of the parameters used to describe kuruma shrimp in a standard DEB model.
List of zero-variate data used to estimate parameters of the kuruma shrimp DEB model. References of observed data and relative error (RE) are specified. The average temperature at which parameters were measured is provided.
| Symbol | Unit | Observation | Prediction | Parameter | RE | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| d | 2.00 | 2.05 | age at birth (27 °C) | 0.0277 | [ |
|
| d | 730 | 728 | life span (22 °C) | 0.0018 | [ |
|
| d | 70.00 | 70.03 | time since birth at puberty (26 °C) | 0.0005 | [ |
|
| cm | 27.00 | 19.83 | ultimate abdominal length for female shrimp | 0.2656 | [ |
|
| cm | 17.00 | 18.46 | ultimate length for male shrimp | 0.0861 | [ |
|
| g | 130.0 | 135.9 | ultimate wet weight | 0.0457 | [ |
|
| #d−1 | 1507 | 1510 | ultimate reproduction rate (27 °C) | 0.0023 | [ |
Figure 2Comparison of model predictions and observations of total length and weight in Guzhenkou Bay (A), Laoshan Bay (B) and an intensive aquaculture pond Hainan Province, China (C,D). The lines indicate model predictions of growth. The circles and triangles indicate observations of total length and wet weight growth, respectively. In (A,B), solid lines and symbols are predictions for females, and dashed lines and open symbols are predictions for males. The observations reflect the mean growth of the species in each environment.
Parameter values of the DEB model for kuruma shrimp at a reference temperature of 20 °C.
| Symbol | Value | Unit | Parameter | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| z | 0.76 | - | zoom factor for female shrimp | This study |
|
| 0.71 | - | zoom factor for male shrimp | This study |
| {Fm} | 6.5 | J·cm−2·d−1 | maximum specific searching rate | This study |
| ύ | 0.0336 | cm·d−1 | energy conductance | This study |
| [EG] | 4439 | J·cm−3 | volume-specific costs for structure | This study |
| [EM] | 13,235 | J·cm−3 | maximum storage density | This study |
|
| 0.98 | - | fraction of catabolic flux to growth and maintenance | This study |
|
| 0.95 | - | fraction of reproductive reserves | This study |
| δM | 0.1585 | - | shape coefficient | This study |
| {PAm} | 1823 | J·cm−2·d−1 | maximum surface-area-specific assimilation rate | This study |
| [PM] | 569 | J·cm−3·d−1 | volume-specific maintenance rate | This study |
| T1 | 293 | K | reference temperature | [ |
| TA | 6200 | K | Arrhenius temperature | [ |
| TH | 302 | K | upper boundary temperature of the tolerance range | [ |
| TL | 283 | K | lower boundary temperature of the tolerance range | [ |
| TAH | 33,800 | K | Arrhenius temperature for the rate of decrease at upper boundary | [ |
| TAL | 13,300 | K | Arrhenius temperature for the rate of decrease at lower boundary | [ |
| ρ | 1 | g·cm−3 | volume-specific dry flesh weight | This study |
|
| 0.0013 | J | maturity at birth | This study |
|
| 0.0966 | J | maturity at metamorphosis | This study |
|
| 2349 | J | maturity at puberty | This study |
|
| 1.8 × 10−7 | J | Weibull aging acceleration | This study |
|
| 0.0001 | - | Gompertz stress coefficient | This study |
Figure 3Modelled (lines) and observed (circles with bars for standard deviation) growth in terms of total length (A) and wet weight (C) for kuruma shrimp in an integrated marine aquaculture pond, and validation for total length (B) and wet weight (D) growth modeled with several goodness-of-fit indices.