| Literature DB >> 31763188 |
M E Cunha1, H Quental-Ferreira1, A Parejo1, S Gamito2, L Ribeiro1, M Moreira1,2, I Monteiro1, F Soares1, P Pousão-Ferreira1.
Abstract
Production costs in extensive and semi-intensive fish culture in earthen ponds are often too high to offer sustainable economic activity due to the low productivity of these systems. The right combination of commercial finfish species with inorganic (primary producers) and organic extractive (bivalves) species in Integrated MultiTrophic Aquaculture (IMTA) create a balanced system with higher profitability and risk reduction. To achieve this, it is crucial to understand the role of each functional groups within the system what we did by comparing three different IMTA production three different IMTA production treatments with distinct combinations of trophic levels: •fish, filter feeders, phytoplankton and macroalgae,•fish, filter feeders and phytoplankton•fish, phytoplankton and macroalgae Each treatment was carried out in two similar ponds under semi-intensive conditions and flow through system, in a total of 6 earthen ponds of 500 m2 surface and depth of 1.5 m. Results showed that the presence of oysters in the ponds enhanced water quality by decreasing turbidity and by controlling phytoplankton which led to regulation of dissolved oxygen levels. The enhanced water quality in these systems lead to improved fish performance and higher biomass production contributing to greater profitability. The combination of fish, oyster, phytoplankton and macroalgae was particularly good providing much more fish supply compared with the other two treatments. •Oysters enhanced water quality in the ponds by decreasing turbidity and controlling phytoplankton which regulated the dissolved oxygen levels.•The enhanced water quality in systems with oysters improve fish performance resulting in higher biomass production and greater profitability.•The combination of fish, oyster, phytoplankton and macroalgae was particularly good providing much more fish supply compared with the other two treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Aquaculture; Grey mullet; IMTA; Japanese oyster; Meagre; Phytoplankton; Pond IMTA; Ulva; White seabream
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763188 PMCID: PMC6861580 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MethodsX ISSN: 2215-0161
Fig. 1IMTA treatments in the study of the role of fish, oysters, phytoplankton and macroalgae.
Initial zootechnical parameters of fish and oyster introduced in each earthen pond.
| Species | # /pond | Mean weight (g) | Mean total length (cm) | Condition Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1450 | 205 ± 63 | 27 ± 3 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | |
| 850 | 52 ± 19 | 14 ± 1 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | |
| 565 | 118 ± 96 | 19 ± 6 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | |
| 18,000 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | – | – |
Fig. 2Aerial view of the Aquaculture Research Station (Estação Piloto de Piscicultura de Olhão, EPPO), south Portugal (37° 02´ N; 07° 49´W) and location of earthen ponds with IMTA treatments (T1, T2, and T3). Arrows indicate water inlet and outlet; R - water reservoir; S – settling pond.
Fig. 3Equipment location in earthen ponds.
Daily water renewal (% of pond volume) according to water temperature and daily feed quantity (EPPO, IPMA).
| Feed day−1 (kg) | <10 | 10–20 | 20–30 | 30–40 | 40–50 | >50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤12 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 |
| 15 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 |
| 18 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 75 | 90 |
| 21 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 120 |
| 24 | 40 | 60 | 75 | 90 | 120 | 140 |
| ≥25 | 50 | 80 | 100 | 120 | 140 | >160 |
Composition of the commercial diet.
| Ingredients | Proximate and mineral elements |
|---|---|
| Fish meal | Crude protein, 42% |
| Transformed animal protein from farmed poultry | Crude fat, 17% |
| Rapeseed meal | Crude ash, 11% |
| Soy meal (peeled and toasted) | Cellulose, 2.0% |
| Feather meal | Calcium, 2.4% |
| Poultry fat | Phosphorus, 1.5% |
| Fish oil | Sodium, 0.3% |
| Pea starch | |
| Blood meal | |
| Carob germ | |
| Brewer’s yeast |
Feed ration table for meagre (EPPO, IPMA).
| Temperature (°C) | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 26 | 28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish size (g) | |||||||
| 50-100 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| 100-150 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| 150-200 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| 200-250 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| 250-300 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 300-350 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 350-400 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 400-450 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 450-500 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Fig. 4Oyster mesh bags exposed to the air.
| Subject Area: | Agricultural and Biological Sciences |
| More specific subject area: | |
| Method name: | Pond IMTA |
| Name and reference of original method: | NA. |
| Resource availability: | NA |