| Literature DB >> 35878916 |
Kelechi L Njoku1, Eme O Ude1,2, Temitope O Jegede1, Omotoyosi Z Adeyanju1, Patricia O Iheme1.
Abstract
Microbe-plant partnership in phytoremediation involves a synergistic interaction that leads to degradation of contaminants. The identification and characterization of these microorganisms is fundamental in environmental management. This study is aimed at investigating the influence of Glycine max and Zea mays on microbial make-up and differentiation of soil bacterial and fungal isolates in crude oil contaminated soil. We employed conventional technique of microbial isolation and gene sequencing to evaluate the microbial composition in crude oil contaminated soil. The microorganisms were isolated from crude oil contaminated soil (0%, 4%, 8%) and were identified using 16S rRNA gene (for bacteria) and Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) gene (for fungi). We observed a change in the microbial cell density with respect to treatment conditions implying a shift in microbial dynamics to total hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria as the dominant microbes. The sequence data revealed five bacteria strain; Klebsiella aerogenes strain 77, Klebsiella aerogenes strain UISO178, Salmonella enterica strain ABUH7, Klebsiella aerogenes strain M242 and Enterobacter sp. NCCP-607 and three fungi strains; Galactomyces geotrichum strain CBS, Aspergillus niger strain YMCHA73 and Trichoderma virens isolate A701. Annotation analysis using FGENESB and gene scan revealed proteins involved in various metabolic processes and hydrocarbon utilization. GHOSTKOLA output revealed several genetic elements and pathways such as DnaA, PYG, mrcA, environmental, cellular and genetic information processing and degradation enhancers. Our findings show that G. max and Z. mays in association with bacteria can enhance ecosystem restoration of crude oil contaminated soil.Entities:
Keywords: Glycine max; Microorganisms; Molecular characterisation; Phytoremediation; Rhizosphere; Zea mays
Year: 2022 PMID: 35878916 PMCID: PMC9314210 DOI: 10.5620/eaht.2022008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Anal Health Toxicol ISSN: 2671-9525
Figure 1The microbial colony count from the rhizosphere soil on day 1 (initial count) and on day 120 (final count) of the study; a =total heterotrophic bacteria, b = total hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria, total fungi; IC =initial count, FG = final count+G. max, FZ = Final count+Z. mays, final count+G. max+Z. mays, FZP = Final count+Z. mays + poultry dung, FGP =Final count+G. max+poultry dung, FGZP = Final count+G. max+Z. mays+poultry dung, FS= Final count in soil alone, FSP = final count in soil+poultry dung.
Figure 2The quality and quantity of the DNA from the different isolates: a= K. aerogenes, strain 77, b = K. aerogenes strain UISO178, c= S. enterica strain ABUH 7, d= K. aerogenes strain M242, e= E. sp. NCCP-607, f= G. geotrichum CBS774.7, g= A. niger YMCHA 73, h= T. virens A701
Summary of bacterial and fungal sequence characteristics
| Organism type | Sample ID | Organism identified by BLAST | Identity (%) | Sequence length (bp) | %Guanine +Cytosine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| a | 97 | 865.00 | 54.22 | |
| b | 98 | 847.00 | 55.14 | ||
| c | 98 | 860.00 | 55.17 | ||
| d | 94 | 925.00 | 54.05 | ||
| e | 99 | 850.00 | 54.71 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| f | 93 | 550.00 | 42.54 | |
| g | 90 | 524.00 | 57.63 | ||
| h | 99 | 635.00 | 54.19 |
Data are sequence information obtained from BLAST output.
The protein-coding genes annotated with GENESCAN and FGENESB.
| Organism | Compared group | Number of predicted protein coding genes | Number of transcription units | Number of operons | Protein sequence with FGENESB | Protein sequence with GENESCAN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | |
|
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |
|
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | |
|
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |
|
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
|
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
All data were predicted genes using FGENESB and GENESCAN from the gene sequence of the organisms.
Figure 3Phylogenetic relationship among all microbial isolates observed in the study.
Predicted potential genes and protein in microbial gene sequence using FGENESB.
| Organism | No of predicted genes | Corresponding protein sequences |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Llptlshlsvslcpggrlrhryssrslrisplhlefypplqdsslpvsnavprlspgilrseldrpahvsaaastese | |
| 5 | VRGCAAAALTCVIASPDVYSRAHLGTAFETGRLESCRGG | |
| 6 | LLPTLSHLSVSLCPGGRLRHRYSSRSLRISPLHLEFYPPLQDSSLPVSNAVPRLSP | |
| 4 | LLPTLSHLSVSLCPGGRLRHRYSSRSLRISPLHLEFYPPLQDSSLPVSNAVPRLSP | |
| 5 | VQQPRYVRGLSPRTCTPRAQPGNCIRNWQARVL | |
| 1 | LFVRSTFTNNKKSLMILPQVHLRKPCYVFTSCPEGPDLAKSKAPRGYKKIWGP | |
| 3 | VQCGLWLVTSAGAGHPTEHVTKPHTLEDRTRCRRCLSGPSPRRGGRRPNTQ | |
| 2 | VDAPRSRCECANYCAGEAAARPPLYFGAGPVKGRSPTPTPRRGSRVEMTLGQ |
All data were predicted genes using FGENESB from the genes sequences of the organisms.
Predicted potential peptides in microbial genomes using GENESCAN.
| Organism | Proteins | Corresponding protein sequences |
|---|---|---|
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | XGRLNALAPEATPQGHNLQVDIVYGVDYQDLYAFHRYTWNSTPLYKTLACQFRM | |
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | XGRLNALAPEATPQGHNLQVDIVYGVDYQDLYAFHRYTWNSTPLYKTLACQFRM | |
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | MRRDLEEYRWRRRPPGQRLTLSGPAGNSKETASDKLEEGGDDVKSSWPLRVGLHT | |
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | YKEKRPRESKRDLIX | |
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | XGRLNALAPEATPQGHNLQVDIVYGVDYQDLYAFHRYTWNSTPLYKTLACQFRM | |
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | XGRLNALAPEATPQGHNLQVDIVYGVDYQDLYAFHRYTWNSTPLYKTLACQFRM | |
| New protein | KANAIPREKQRSNKYTLGDTPKCNVRSKTDDSLLQFTRNIAFRCVLHRYENQEIHC | |
| Erythrose-4-phosphate dehydrogenase | MARLRVRMLGVF |
All information were obtained using GENESCAN from the genes sequences of the organisms.
Protein coding genes and genetic elements of the bacteria and fungi strains.
| S/N | Organism | Genes | Enzymes/proteins | Pathways | Functional annotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVE, AALB, VEM, ECO, ECJ, EBW, ECE, ECF, dnaA | Nucleoid associated proteins | Two-component system, Cell cycle - Caulobacter | dnaA, Environmental, cellular and genetic Information Processing | ||
| pbpC, LCQ, ECO, ECJ, ECD, EBW, ECOK, ECE, ECS, ECF, ETW | Transferases, pbpC Glycosyl transferases, Hexosyl transferases, peptidoglycan glycosyl transferase | Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis. | mrcA, Metabolism, biosynthesis and degradation, pbpC. | ||
| pbpC, LCQ, ECO, ECJ, ECD, EBW, ECOK, ECE, ECS, ECF, ETW | Transferases, pbpC Glycosyltransferases, Hexosyltransferases, peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase | Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis. | PbpC, Metabolism, biosynthesis and degradation, pbpC. | ||
| PYG, glgP, HAS, PTR, PPS, GGO, PON, NLE, MCC, MCF, CSAB, RRO, EDEM1 | Transferases, Glycosyltransferases, Hexosyltransferases, PYG, glgP; glycogen phosphorylase | Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, Starch and sucrose metabolism, Metabolic pathways, Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, Biofilm formation, Necroptosis, Insulin signaling pathway, Glucagon signaling pathway, Insulin resistance | EDEM1, PYG, glgP, Degradation enhancer, cellular and genetic Information Processing. | ||
| mrcA, LCQ, PXY, TVA (TVAG), ECO, ECJ, ECD (ECDH10B), EBW, ECOK, ECE, ECS. | Transferases, Glycosyltransferases, Hexosyltransferases, peptidoglycan glycosyltransferase, mrcA; penicillin-binding protein 1A, Hydrolases, peptidases, Serine-type carboxypeptidases. | Peptidoglycan biosynthesis, Metabolic pathways, beta-Lactam resistance | mrcA, pbpC, Metabolism, Biosynthesis, Degradation and Drug resistance, ATP-dependent DNA helicase Rep. | ||
| COL5AS, HSA, PTR, PPS, GGO, PON, NLE, MCC, MCF, CSAB, RRO. | Glycosaminoglycan binding proteins, Haparin, collagen | Protein digestion and absorption | signaling and cellular processes | ||
| LAMA3_5, HAS, PTR, PPS, GGO, PON, NLE, MCC, MCF, CSAB, RRO. | Laminin | PI3K-Akt signaling, Focal adhesion, ECM-receptor interaction, Toxoplasmosis, Amoebiasis, Human papillomavirus infection, Pathways in cancer, Small cell lung cancer | LAMA3_5, Environmental Information Processing, Signal transduction | ||
| pnp, PNPT1, HAS, PTR, PPS, GGO, PON, NLE, MCC, MCF, CSAB, RRO | Transferases, Nucleotidyltransferases, pnp, PNPT1; polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase | RNA degradation | pnp, PNPT1, Transferring phosphorus-containing groups, Genetic Information Processing, Folding, sorting and degradation |
All data were predicted genes using FGENESB from the genes sequences of the organisms.