| Literature DB >> 35877744 |
Diaa T A Youssef1, Lamiaa A Shaala2,3, Grégory Genta-Jouve4.
Abstract
Investigation of the cytotoxic fractions of the ethyl acetate extract of the fermentation broth of the tunicate-derived Aspergillus sp. DY001 afforded two new dipeptides, asperopiperazines A and B (1 and 2), along with the previously reported compounds (+)-citreoisocoumarin (3) and (-)-6,8-di-O-methylcitreoisocoumarin (4). Analyses of the 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data of the compounds supported their structural assignments. Asperopiperazine A (1) is a cyclic dipeptide of leucine and phenylalanine moieties, which are substituted with an N-methyl and an N-acetyl group, respectively. On the other hand, asperopiperazine B (2) is a cyclic dipeptide of proline and phenylalanine moieties with a hydroxyl group at C-2 of the proline part. The absolute configuration of the amino acid moieties in 1 and 2 were determined by Marfey's analyses and DFT NMR chemical shift calculations, leading to their assignment as cyclo(l-NMe-Leu-l-NAc-Phe) and cyclo(d-6-OH-Pro-l-Phe), respectively. Asperopiperazines A and B displayed higher antimicrobial effects against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus than Candida albicans. Furthermore, compounds 1-4 displayed variable growth inhibitory effects towards HCT 116 and MDA-MB-231 cells, with asperopiperazine A as the most active one towards HCT 116.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus sp. DY001; Didemnum sp.; antimicrobial activity; asperopiperazines A and B; associated fungi; cell lines’ growth inhibition; marine dipeptides; red sea tunicate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35877744 PMCID: PMC9319533 DOI: 10.3390/md20070451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
Figure 1Structures of 1–4, and COSY and HMBC correlations of 1 and 2.
NMR spectral data of asperopiperazines A (1) and B (2).
| Position | 1 (CD3OD) a | 2 (CDCl3) b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC (mult.) c | δH (mult. | δC (mult.) c | δH (mult. | |
| 2 | 174.5, C | 166.1, C | ||
| 3 | 52.6, CH | 5.00 (t, 7.8) | 55.8, CH | 4.45 (dd, 11.0, 3.3) |
| 4 (N | - | 5.58 (brs) | ||
| 5 | 175.2, C | 167.9, C | ||
| 6 | 56.3, CH | 5.04 (dd, 9.6, 6.0) | 87.6, C | |
| 6-O | 2.98 (brs) | |||
| 7 | 38.1, CH2 | 1.62 (m) | 36.8, CH2 | 2.23 (m), 2.17 (m) |
| 8 | 25.8, CH | 1.42 (m) | 19.9, CH2 | 2.17 (m), 2.00 (m) |
| 9 | 23.6, CH3 | 0.91 (d, 6.6) | 45.5, CH2 | 3.79 (m), 3.59 (m) |
| 10 | 22.0, CH3 | 0.85 (d, 6.6) | 36.9, CH2 | 3.63 (dd, 14.4, 4.2) |
| 11 | 38.7, CH2 | 3.06 (dd, 13.2, 7.6) | 135.7, C | |
| 12 | 138.0, C | 129.1, CH | 7.23 (d, 7.5) | |
| 13 | 129.6, CH | 7.25 (m) | 129.3, CH | 7.35 (t, 7.5) |
| 14 | 130.4, CH | 7.25 (m) | 127.6, CH | 7.29 (t, 7.5) |
| 15 | 128.1, CH | 7.21 (m) | 129.3, CH | 7.35 (t, 7.5) |
| 16 | 130.4, CH | 7.25 (m) | 129.1, CH | 7.23 (d, 7.5) |
| 17 | 129.6, CH | 7.25 (m) | ||
| 18 | 31.7, CH3 | 2.84 (s) | ||
| 19 | 172.8, C | |||
| 20 | 22.1, CH3 | 1.89 (s) | ||
(a) Recorded at 600 MHz for 1H and 150 MHz for 13C NMR; (b) Recorded at 850 MHz for 1H and 213 MHz for 13C NMR; (c) All 13C NMR signals were unambiguously assigned from HSQC and HMBC experiments.
Figure 2Reaction of l-FDLA with hydrolytic products of asperopiperazine A (1).
Figure 3Reaction of l-FDLA with hydrolytic products of asperopiperazine B (2).
Comparison of the 13C NMR data of the 6-OH-Pro moiety in 2 and cyclo(d-6-OH-Pro-l-Phe).
| Carbon No. | Compound 2 | Cyclo(6-OH- | ΔδC (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| δC (CDCl3) | δC (CDCl3) | ||
| C-6 | 87.6 | 87.6 | 0.0 |
| C-7 | 36.8 | 36.8 | 0.0 |
| C-8 | 19.9 | 19.9 | 0.0 |
| C-9 | 45.5 | 45.4 | −0.1 |
Figure 4Calculated and predicted 13C NMR chemical shifts for 2.
Antimicrobial activities of 1–4.
| Compound No. |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition Zone (mm) | MIC (μM) | Inhibition Zone (mm) | MIC (μM) | Inhibition Zone (mm) | MIC (μM) | |
|
| 11 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 8 |
|
| 12 | 16 | 23 | 4 | 18 | 8 |
|
| 17 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 8 |
|
| 9 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 6 | 32 |
| Ciprofloxacin a | NT | 30 | 0.08 | 22 | ||
| Ketoconazole b | 30 | 0.26 | NT | NT | NT | |
(a) Positive antibacterial control (5 µg/disc); (b) positive antifungal control (50 µg/disc); NT = not tested.
Antiproliferative activities of 1–4.
| Compound | IC50 (μM) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MDA-MB-231 | HeLa | HCT 116 | |
|
| 24.3 ± 0.2 | ≥50.0 | 15.1 ± 0.1 |
|
| 26.3 ± 0.3 | ≥50.0 | 16.2 ± 0.1 |
|
| 31.0 ± 0.2 | ≥50.0 | 19.3 ± 0.1 |
|
| 35.0 ± 0.2 | ≥50.0 | 17.7 ± 0.1 |
| 5-FU b | 13.0 ± 0.3 | 12.3 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.2 |
(a) The results represent the mean of three independent experiments; (b) 5-Flourouracil, a positive cytotoxic control.
Figure 5(a) Photographs of the Red Sea tunicate Didemnum sp. and (b) the fungus Aspergillus sp. DY001.