| Literature DB >> 35875714 |
Jose Maria Gomez-Arguelles1,2, Oscar Caceres3, Manuel Blanco3, Ceferino Maestu2, Francisco Martin4.
Abstract
Introduction: There is growing interest in the relationship between fibromyalgia and processes related to food, such as food intolerances. In fact, different associations have been described between the control of dietary habits and the improvement of the different symptoms of fibromyalgia. Material and methods: We collected the results of applying a specific test of histamine release related to the diet of patients with fibromyalgia, and evaluated the changes in terms of the symptoms usually described by the patients. A total of 84 patients who met the established criteria were recruited; 40 of them underwent the exclusion diet for a period of 6 months, while the remaining ones continued with their usual dietary habits. All patients were instructed not to modify any other parameter during the study, such as medication, exercise, or other complementary treatments. The parameters studied were as follows: the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS), the pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), as well as the patients' body weight was controlled.Entities:
Keywords: exclusion diet; fibromyalgia; food intolerance; gastrointestinal symptoms; histamine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35875714 PMCID: PMC9301665 DOI: 10.5114/reum.2022.117841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reumatologia ISSN: 0034-6233
Food groups eliminated from the diet according to histamine levels, in total number and percentage
| Food groups | Number (n) | Percentage [%] |
|---|---|---|
| Milk derivates | 29 | 72.5 |
| Gluten derivates | 25 | 62.5 |
| Tomato | 14 | 35.0 |
| Garlic | 9 | 22.5 |
| Oily fish | 9 | 22.5 |
| White fish | 8 | 20.0 |
| Meat products | 7 | 17.5 |
| Pork products | 7 | 17.5 |
| Chicken products | 6 | 15.0 |
| Rice | 6 | 15.0 |
| Egg | 6 | 15.0 |
Results of the means and confidence intervals (CI) of the biodemographic data, and different scales at the beginning (1) and end (2) of the study, with their statistical significance (p), both in the group that followed the exclusion diet and in the control group
| Parameters | Diet group ( | Control group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | CI | Mean | CI | |||
| Age | 48 | 3.2 | 47 | 3.6 | ||
| Weight1 | 74 | 25.5 | 0.01 | 70 | 23.1 | 0.50 |
| Weight2 | 68 | 17 | 73 | 24 | ||
| VAS1 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 0.10 | 8.1 | 2.4 | 0.26 |
| VAS2 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 7.9 | 2.1 | ||
| FIQ1 | 78 | 16 | 0.10 | 80 | 21 | 0.10 |
| FIQ2 | 73 | 19 | 76 | 19 | ||
| GSRS1 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.05 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.50 |
| GSRS2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 1.1 | ||
FIQ – Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, GSRS – Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale, VAS – Visual Analogue Scale.