| Literature DB >> 35874194 |
Paola Borrego-Muñoz1, Lili Dahiana Becerra1, Felipe Ospina1, Ericsson Coy-Barrera1, Diego Quiroga1.
Abstract
Schiff bases are widely used molecules due to their potential biological activity. In this manuscript, we presented the synthesis and NMR study of new enamine Schiff bases derived from l-tryptophan, showing that the Z-form of the enamine is the main tautomeric form for aliphatic precursors. The DFT-B3LYP methodology at the 6-311+G**(d,p) level suggested that the tautomeric imine forms are less stable than the corresponding enamine forms. Their isomerism depends on the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds and steric factors associated with the starting carbonyl precursors. The in vitro biological activity tests against Fusarium oxysporum revealed that acetylacetone derivatives are the most active agents (IC50 < 0.9 mM); however, the antifungal activity could be disfavored by bulky groups on ester and enamine moieties. Finally, the structure-based virtual screening through molecular docking and MM-GBSA rescoring revealed that Schiff bases 3e, 3g, and 3j behave putatively as binders for target proteins involved in the life processes of F. oxysporum. In this sense, molecular dynamics analysis showed that the ligand-protein complexes have good stability with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values within the allowed range. Therefore, the present study paves the way for designing new antifungal compounds based on l-tryptophan-derived Schiff bases.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874194 PMCID: PMC9301946 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Synthesis of Enamines 3a–l
Yields of the Synthesized Compounds 3a–l Using Method A or B
| product | method A: linear strategy reaction conditions for each step 1. and 2. (solvent, temperature, time) | yield (%) | method B: one-pot reaction conditions (solvent, temperature, time) | yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. MeOH, rt, 24 h; 2. THF, reflux, 20 h | 45 | MeOH, reflux, 20 h | 89 | |
| 1. EtOH, rt, 24 h; 2. THF, reflux, 20 h | 31 | EtOH, reflux, 20 h | 85 | |
| 1. | 17 | 77 | ||
| 1. | 12 | 76 | ||
| 1. MeOH, rt, 24 h; 2. THF, reflux, 25 h | 41 | MeOH, reflux, 25 h | 81 | |
| 1. EtOH, rt, 24 h; 2. THF, reflux, 25 h | 33 | EtOH, reflux, 25 h | 74 | |
| 1. | 15 | 69 | ||
| 1. | 9 | 66 | ||
| 1. MeOH, rt, 24 h; 2. THF, reflux, 30 h | 40 | MeOH, reflux, 30 h | 75 | |
| 1. EtOH, rt, 24 h; 2. THF, reflux, 30 h | 29 | EtOH, reflux, 30 h | 72 | |
| 1. | 16 | 67 | ||
| 1. | 8 | 65 |
Scheme 2Enamine and Imine Tautomeric Forms of the Synthesized Compounds
Calculated DFT-B3LYP Total Energies for the Two Possible Z- and E-Isomeric Enamine (3)–Imine (4) Tautomers
| product | imine form energy | Δ | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| –955.977 | –955.990 | –955.918 | –0.072 | –0.013 | |
| –996.722 | –996.743 | –996.671 | –0.072 | –0.021 | |
| –1028.131 | –1034.645 | –1034.573 | –0.072 | –6.514 | |
| –1067.169 | –1073.967 | –1073.888 | –0.079 | –6.798 | |
| –1109.516 | –1109.537 | –1109.472 | –0.065 | –0.021 | |
| –1148.821 | –1148.855 | –1149.787 | –0.068 | –0.034 | |
| –1181.408 | –1188.169 | –1188.098 | –0.071 | –6.761 | |
| –1220.637 | –1227.468 | –1227.396 | –0.072 | –6.831 | |
| –1026.964 | –1033.434 | –1033.359 | –0.075 | –6.470 | |
| –1071.834 | –1077.981 | –1070.911 | –0.070 | –6.147 | |
| –1105.055 | –1112.092 | –1112.013 | –0.079 | –7.037 | |
| –1144.092 | –1151.412 | –1151.331 | –0.081 | –7.320 |
All of the energy values are expressed in Hartree.
Figure 1Representation of LUMO for compound 3a (isovalue: 0.02).
Figure 2Proposed molecular structure for the Z-isomer 3l.
Figure 3Two-dimensional (2D) experiments for compound 3a in CDCl3. (a) 2D-COSY, (b) HSQC, (c) HMBC, and (d) 2D-NOESY.
Figure 4FT-IR spectra in the region between 1500 and 4000 cm–1 of selected compounds 3a,b and 3i–j.
Antifungal Activity of Compounds 3a–l against F. oxysporum
| product | IC50 (mM) |
|---|---|
| 0.60 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.52 ± 0.03 | |
| 0.72 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.87 ± 0.06 | |
| 0.60 ± 0.05 | |
| 2.90 ± 0.03 | |
| >100 | |
| >100 | |
| 3.86 ± 0.02 | |
| 2.55 ± 0.01 | |
| >100 | |
| >100 | |
| 0.061 ± 0.002 |
Data expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3).
Validation of the Models by Homology
| homology model | PDB template | % IDEN | GMEQ | Ramachandran plot | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eburicol 14α-demethylase ( | 6CR2-chain A | 66.8 | 0.82 | 90.5% | –9.63 |
| β-tubulin ( | 5ZXH-chain B | 83.4 | 0.86 | 90.9% | –10.07 |
| cytochrome b ( | 1EZV-chain C | 57.8 | 0.78 | 94.6% | –4.05 |
| topoisomerase II ( | 1QZR-chain A, B | 52.7 | 0.76 | 91.3% | –9.25 |
% IDEN: % sequence identity.
GMEQ: global model quality estimation.
Ramachandran plot: energetically allowed regions of a protein (expressed in %).
Z-score: estimates the general quality of the model.
Results of Molecular Docking and Binding Free Energies for Schiff Bases
| receptor | compound | GlideScore | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| eburicol 14-α-demethylase | –7.24 | –46.65 | |
| β-tubulin | –2.77 | –47.07 | |
| cytochrome b | –6.16 | –65.12 | |
| topoisomerase II | –5.70 | –61.86 |
GlideScore was calculated in kcal/mol. The Glide SP visualization module was used to analyze the coupled poses, and the binding free energy (kcal/mol) was calculated using molecular mechanics-generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA).
Figure 5Three-dimensional (3D) structures of the best docking poses of ligand–receptor complexes. (a) F. oxysporum eburicol 14α-demethylase (FoEDM)...3g; (b) F. oxysporum β-tubulin (FoβT)...3e; (c) F. oxysporum cytochrome b (FoCCb)...3j; and (d) F. oxysporum topoisomerase II (FoTI-II)...3e. Receptor residues and ligands are sketched in gray lines and black sticks, respectively. Heme group in FoEDM is sketched in green sticks. Relevant interactions between the ligand and receptor per complex are depicted by dashed tubes (light blue = π–π stacking; orange = hydrophobic; yellow = hydrogen bond).
Figure 6RMSD plots after molecular dynamics simulations for the test protein...ligand complexes. (a) F. oxysporum eburicol 14α-demethylase (FoEDM)...3g; (b) F. oxysporum β-tubulin (FoβT)...3e; (c) F. oxysporum cytochrome b (FoCCb)...3j; and (d) F. oxysporum topoisomerase II (FoTI-II)...3e. αβ.