| Literature DB >> 35873837 |
Zhexi He1,2, Cho Ying Li1, Calvin Hoi-Kwan Mak1, Tat Shing Tse1, Fung Ching Cheung1.
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) using a tubular retractor has been increasingly utilized in spinal surgery for degenerative conditions with the benefit of paraspinal muscle preservation. This benefit has not been previously reported for intradural extramedullary tumors using the MIS approach. In this study, we aimed to compare the degree of postoperative fatty degeneration in paraspinal muscle between MIS with tubular retractor (MIS) and open laminectomy (Open) for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors. Methods This was a retrospective review conducted in a tertiary neurosurgical center from 2015 to 2019. The degree of paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration, as measured by Goutallier grade on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was analyzed, and the degree of excision, tumor recurrence rate, and chronic pain were compared between the two surgical approaches. Results Among 9 patients in the MIS group and 33 patients in the Open group, the rate of gross total resection was comparable (MIS: 100.0%, Open: 97.0%, p = 1.000). The degree of paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration was significantly reduced in the MIS group (median Goutallier grade 1 in MIS group vs. median Goutallier grade 2 in Open group, p = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the tumor recurrence rate, complication rate, and chronic pain severity. A consistent trend of reduced analgesic consumption was observed in the MIS group, though not statistically significant. Conclusions Minimally invasive tubular retractor surgery is an effective approach for appropriately selected intradural extramedullary spinal tumors with significantly reduced postoperative fatty degeneration in paraspinal muscle. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: laminectomy; magnetic resonance imaging; minimally invasive surgical procedures; paraspinal muscles; spinal neoplasms
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873837 PMCID: PMC9298595 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Neurosurg
Illustration of Goutallier grading criteria by postoperative imaging in MIS and Open cases
| Goutallier grading | Case illustration | Description | Surgery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 0 |
| No fat infiltration visible in the paraspinal muscle | MIS |
| Grade 1 |
| Fatty streaks infiltration in the paraspinal muscle | Open |
| Grade 2 |
| Fatty infiltration in the paraspinal muscle with fat less than muscle | Open |
| Grade 3 |
| Fatty infiltration in the paraspinal muscle with fat equals to muscle | Open |
| Grade 4 |
| Fatty infiltration in the paraspinal muscle with fat more than muscle | Open |
Abbreviations: MIS, minimally invasive surgery; Open, open laminectomy.
Demographics, clinical assessment, and imaging characteristics between the MIS and Open groups
| Whole group | MIS | Open | Statistics |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age at operation (y) | Mean ± SD | 62.4 | ± 14.3 | 59.8 | ± 14.8 | 63.2 | ± 14.3 | T | 0.553 |
| Gender | Fisher | 0.133 | |||||||
| Male | 14 | 33.3% | 5 | 55.6% | 9 | 27.3% | |||
| Female | 28 | 66.7% | 4 | 44.4% | 24 | 72.7% | |||
| Neurological symptoms | Fisher | ||||||||
| Limb weakness | 30 | 71.4% | 4 | 44.4% | 26 | 78.8% | 0.090 | ||
| Limb numbness | 12 | 28.6% | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 27.3% | 0.699 | ||
| Neuropathic pain | 11 | 26.1% | 4 | 44.4% | 7 | 21.1% | 0.209 | ||
| Asymptomatic | 2 | 4.8% | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 3.0% | 0.387 | ||
| Duration of neurological symptoms (mo) | Mean ± SD | 8.0 | ± 7.5 | 14.1 | ± 11.6 | 6.4 | ± 5.4 | T | 0.108 |
| Preoperative limb power by MRC grading | MWU | 0.413 | |||||||
| Grade 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Grade 1 | 1 | 2.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.03% | |||
| Grade 2 | 2 | 4.8% | 2 | 22.2% | 0 | 0.00% | |||
| Grade 3 | 12 | 28.6% | 1 | 11.1% | 13 | 39.4% | |||
| Grade 4 | 16 | 38.1% | 1 | 11.1% | 11 | 33.3% | |||
| Grade 5 | 11 | 26.2% | 5 | 55.6% | 8 | 24.2% | |||
| Lesion location | Fisher | 0.962 | |||||||
| Cervical | 8 | 19.0% | 2 | 22.2% | 6 | 18.2% | |||
| Thoracic | 29 | 69.1% | 6 | 66.7% | 23 | 69.7% | |||
| Lumbar | 5 | 11.9% | 1 | 11.1% | 4 | 12.1% | |||
| Preoperative JOA score | Mean ± SD | T | |||||||
| Cervical | 11.9 | ± 2.0 | 11.5 | ± 2.1 | 12.0 | 2.2 | 0.804 | ||
| Thoracic | 7.0 | ± 2.2 | 8.2 | ± 2.1 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 0.185 | ||
| Lumbar | 17.0 | ± 6.4 | 8.0 | – | 19.3 | 4.6 | 0.119 | ||
| Lesion size (cm) | Mean ± SD | T | |||||||
| Transverse | 1.46 | ± 0.50 | 1.37 | ± 0.41 | 1.48 | ± 0.53 | 0.523 | ||
| Anteroposterior | 1.19 | ± 0.33 | 1.24 | ± 0.35 | 1.17 | ± 0.33 | 0.643 | ||
| Craniocaudal | 1.73 | ± 0.58 | 1.81 | ± 0.54 | 1.70 | ± 0.60 | 0.604 | ||
| Pathology | 0.124 | ||||||||
| Meningioma | 25 | 61.9% | 3 | 33.3% | 22 | 66.7% | |||
| Schwannoma | 17 | 38.0% | 6 | 66.7% | 11 | 33.3% | |||
| Follow-up durations (mo) | Mean ± SD | 42.4 | ± 19.5 | 34.6 | ± 11.6 | 44.5 | ± 20.7 | 0.075 | |
Abbreviations: Fisher, Fisher's exact test; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; MRC grading, medical research council grading; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; MWU, Mann–Whitney U -test; Open, open surgery; SD, standard deviation; T, independent t -test.
Note: Statistical significant was set at p < 0.05.
Intraoperative details, postoperative length of stay, and complications for MIS and Open groups
| MIS | Open | Statistics |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood loss (mL) | Mean ± SD | 150 | ± 112 | 166 | ± 87 | T | 0.697 |
| Operation time (min) | Mean ± SD | 192 | ± 71 | 200 | ± 55 | T | 0.732 |
| Length of stay (d) | Mean ± SD | 11.6 | ± 15.8 | 10.3 | ± 9.3 | T | 0.830 |
| Degree of excision | Fisher | ||||||
| Gross total excision | 9 | 100.0% | 32 | 97.0% | 1.000 | ||
| Partial excision | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.0% | |||
| Postoperative power by MRC grading | MWU | 0.861 | |||||
| Grade 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |||
| Grade 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | |||
| Grade 2 | 2 | 22.2% | 1 | 3.0% | |||
| Grade 3 | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 3.0% | |||
| Grade 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 12 | 36.3% | |||
| Grade 5 | 6 | 66.6% | 19 | 57.6% | |||
| Change in MRC grading | Median (mean rank) | 1 | 13.80 | 1 | 16.42 | MWU | 0.527 |
| Postoperative JOA Score | Mean ± SD | ||||||
| Cervical | 13.5 | ± 3.5 | 15.3 | ± 1.4 | T | 0.804 | |
| Thoracic | 10.5 | ± 0.8 | 9.8 | ± 1.2 | 0.142 | ||
| Lumbar | 12.0 | – | 27.5 | ± 0.60 | – | ||
| Change of JOA score | Mean ± SD | ||||||
| Cervical | 2.0 | ± 1.4 | 3.3 | ± 1.4 | T | 0.383 | |
| Thoracic | 2.3 | ± 1.8 | 3.1 | ± 1.7 | 0.375 | ||
| Lumbar | 4 | – | 8.3 | ± 4.2 | – | ||
| Major complications | – | Fisher | |||||
| Urinary tract infection | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.0% | 1.000 | ||
| Postoperative hemorrhage | 1 | 11.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.214 | ||
| Pseudomeningocele | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.0% | 1.000 | ||
| CSF leakage | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.0% | 1.000 | ||
| CNS Infection | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.0% | 1.000 | ||
| Need of second surgery | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 3.0% | 0.407 | ||
| Deep vein thrombosis | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.000 | ||
| Persistent neurological deficit | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 3.0% | 0.407 | ||
| Mortality | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1.000 | ||
Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CNS, central nervous system; Fisher, Fisher's exact test; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MRC, Medical Research Council; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; MWU, Mann–Whitney U -test; Open, open surgery; SD, standard deviation; T, independent t -test.
Assessment outcomes from postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and pain conditions for minimally invasive surgery group and open surgery group
| MIS | Open | Statistics |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration on MRI | Median (mean rank) | 1 | 13.61 | 2 | 23.65 | MWU |
0.023
|
| Goutallier grade 0 | 4 | 44.4% | 0 | 0.0% | |||
| Goutallier grade 1 | 1 | 11.1% | 9 | 27.3% | |||
| Goutallier grade 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 14 | 42.4% | |||
| Goutallier grade 3 | 1 | 11.1% | 4 | 12.1% | |||
| Goutallier grade 4 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 18.2% | |||
| Duration from operation to assessment MRI (mo) | Mean ± SD | 12.4 | ± 9.6 | 15.9 | ± 9.9 | T | 0.355 |
| Residual or recurrent tumor on most recent MRI | Fisher | 0.525 | |||||
| Residual/recurrent rate | 1 | 11.1% | 2 | 6.1% | |||
| Complete excision rate | 8 | 88.9% | 31 | 93.9% | |||
| Maximal diameter of residual tumor (cm) | 0.3 | 1.8 | |||||
| Maximal diameter of recurrent tumor (cm) | – | 0.4 | |||||
| Duration from operation to most recent MRI | 19 | ± 16.5 | 26.1 | ± 19.3 | T | 0.308 | |
| Chronic pain | MWU | 0.697 | |||||
| No pain | 6 | 75% | 21 | 65.6% | |||
| Mild pain | 1 | 12.5% | 8 | 25.0% | |||
| Moderate pain | 1 | 12.5% | 3 | 9.4% | |||
| Severe pain | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||
| Regular use of analgesics | Fisher | ||||||
| Gabapentinoids | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 9.4% | 0.502 | ||
| Nongabapentinoids | 1 | 12.5% | 4 | 18.8% | 0.694 | ||
| Any analgesics | 1 | 12.5% | 6 | 18.8% | 0.569 | ||
Abbreviations: Fisher, Fisher's exact test; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MWU, Mann–Whitney U -test; Open, open surgery; SD, standard deviation; T, independent t -test.
Pain analysis was performed in 8 patients in MIS group and 32 patients in the open group.
p < 0.05.
Fig. 1( A–K ) Postoperative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at the operative level for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors. ( A–D ) Cases with Goutallier grade 0 in MIS group, ( E ) the case with Goutallier grade 1 in MIS group. ( F–H ) Cases with Goutallier grade 2 in MIS group and patient in ( H ) received open surgery for epidural hematoma after MIS. ( I ) The case with Goutallier grade 3 in the MIS group. Facet joints were preserved in all cases. The facet joints were obscured by the axial cutting in ( A, B ), and the corresponding sagittal image ( J, K ) suggested intact facet joints respectively (the operative level was indicated by the black arrow ).
Fig. 2( A–D ) Postoperative T1-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging at the operative level for patients who underwent open laminectomy for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors. The degree of paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration was Goutallier grade 1 in ( A ), grade 2 in ( B ), grade 3 in ( C ), and grade 4 in ( D ).
Fig. 3The degree of postoperative paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration by Goutallier grade between the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and the open surgery (Open) group. (MIS median Goutallier grade 1, mean rank = 13.61, Open median Goutallier grade 2, mean rank = 23.65, p = 0.023 by Mann–Whitney U -test). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Open, open laminectomy.
Subgroup analysis for paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration on MRI by different levels of the tumors
| MIS | Open | Statistics |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration on MRI | Median (mean rank) | 2.5 | 3.75 | 3 | 4.75 | MWU | 0.604 |
| Cervical lesions | |||||||
| Goutallier grade 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 33.3 | |||
| Goutallier grade 2 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 3 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 16.7 | |||
| Goutallier grade 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 50.0 | |||
| Paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration on MRI | Median (mean rank) | 0 | 6.17 | 2.0 | 17.30 | MWU |
0.002
|
| Thoracic lesions | |||||||
| Goutallier grade 0 | 4 | 66.7 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 1 | 1 | 16.7 | 6 | 26.1 | |||
| Goutallier grade 2 | 1 | 16.7 | 14 | 60.9 | |||
| Goutallier grade 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 8.7 | |||
| Goutallier grade 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 4.3 | |||
| Paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration on MRI | Median (mean rank) | 2 | 2.00 | 3.5 | 3.25 | MWU | 0.468 |
| Lumbar lesions | |||||||
| Goutallier grade 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 25.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 2 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 25.0 | |||
| Goutallier grade 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 50.0 | |||
Abbreviations: MIS, minimally invasive surgery; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; MWU, Mann–Whitney U -test; Open, open surgery.
p < 0.01.