Literature DB >> 26235010

Comparison of minimally invasive transspinous and open approaches for thoracolumbar intradural-extramedullary spinal tumors.

Kunal P Raygor1, Khoi D Than1, Dean Chou1, Praveen V Mummaneni1.   

Abstract

OBJECT Spinal tumor resection has historically been performed via open approaches, although minimally invasive approaches have recently been found to be effective in small cohort series. The authors compare surgical characteristics and clinical outcomes of surgery in patients undergoing mini-open and open approaches for intradural-extramedullary tumor resection. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed 65 consecutive intradural-extramedullary tumor resections performed at their institution from 2007 to 2014. Patients with cervical tumors or pathology demonstrating neurofibroma were excluded (n = 14). The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson chi-square test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS Fifty-one thoracolumbar intradural-extramedullary tumor resections were included; 25 were performed via the minimally invasive transspinous approach. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, preoperative symptom duration, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class, tumor size, or tumor location. There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to the duration of the operation or extent of resection, but the mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cohort (142 vs 320 ml, p < 0.05). In each group, the 2 most common tumor pathologies were schwannoma and meningioma. There were no statistically significant differences in length of hospitalization, ASIA score improvement, complication rate, or recurrence rate. The mean duration of follow-up was 2 years for the MIS group and 1.6 years for the open surgery group. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the largest comparisons of minimally invasive and open approaches to the resection of thoracolumbar intradural-extramedullary tumors. With well-matched cohorts, the minimally invasive transspinous approach appears to be as safe and effective as the open technique, with the advantage of significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; ASIA = American Spinal Injury Association; EBL = estimated blood loss; LOS = length of stay; MIS = minimally invasive surgery; PCA = patient-controlled anesthesia; extramedullary; intradural; minimally invasive surgery; spinal tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26235010     DOI: 10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  4 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Tubular Retractor Surgery for Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumor Reduces Postoperative Degeneration of Paraspinal Muscle.

Authors:  Zhexi He; Cho Ying Li; Calvin Hoi-Kwan Mak; Tat Shing Tse; Fung Ching Cheung
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?

Authors:  Amir Goodarzi; Jared Clouse; Tatiana Capizzano; Kee D Kim; Ripul Panchal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-23

3.  The Effect and Optimal Dosage of Dexmedetomidine Plus Sufentanil for Postoperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients With Postoperative Delirium and Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Wenshuai Zhao; Yanan Hu; Hui Chen; Xifan Wang; Liping Wang; Yu Wang; Xiaohong Wu; Fei Han
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Is Less Really More? Economic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew S Chung; Alexander Ballatori; Brandon Ortega; Elliot Min; Blake Formanek; John Liu; Patrick Hsieh; Raymond Hah; Jeffrey C Wang; Zorica Buser
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.