Neslihan Kurtulmuş1, Fatma Tokat2, Mete Düren1, Hakan Kaya1, Burak Ertaş3, Ümit İnce2. 1. Clinic of Thyroid, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Pathology, Acıbadem University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey. 3. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Acıbadem Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an angiogenic factor that plays an important role in physiological and pathological angiogenesis of the thyroid. The aim of the current study was to determine the expression characteristics of VEGF in follicular cell-derived lesions of the thyroid and to assess whether a new entity noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) is precancerous. Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with 33 follicular adenomas (FA), 41 invasive follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer (IN-FVPTC), and 40 NIFTP in surgical resection materials were evaluated retrospectively. Immunostaining was performed on 5-μm paraffin tissue sections. The percentages of immunostaing for VEGF were evaluated on pathological materials. We used a percentage of labeled thyrocytes score (0, no labeling; 1, <30%; 2, 31-60%; 3, >60%) and an intensity score (0, no staining; 1, weak; 2, intermediate; 3, strong). The sum of two scores were accepted as the total score. Results: Mean ages of the FA, IN-FVPTC, and NIFTP groups were 44.7 ± 11.7 years, 46.9 ± 13.6 years, 43.2 ± 15.4 years, respectively and the mean VEGF immunostaining scores were 44.7 ± 29.3, 50.2 ± 32.54, 4 ± 26.3 respectively. Although there was no statistically significant difference (p= 0.347), the total score of the NIFTPs was higher than the scores of the FA (mean= 3.9 ± 1.8) and IN-FVPTC(mean= 4.3 ± 1.9) groups with a mean value of 4.6 ± 1.7. This result was remarkable. There was no statistically significant difference between tumor diameters and staining percentages (p= 0.750). Conclusion: Even if there were no statistical differences for VEGF immunostaining, it was high in NIFTPs. Since we know the role of VEGF in tumorigenesis, we can hypothesize that NIPTP can be precancerous. Our argue should be corroborated by a large prospective study.
Objective: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an angiogenic factor that plays an important role in physiological and pathological angiogenesis of the thyroid. The aim of the current study was to determine the expression characteristics of VEGF in follicular cell-derived lesions of the thyroid and to assess whether a new entity noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) is precancerous. Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with 33 follicular adenomas (FA), 41 invasive follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer (IN-FVPTC), and 40 NIFTP in surgical resection materials were evaluated retrospectively. Immunostaining was performed on 5-μm paraffin tissue sections. The percentages of immunostaing for VEGF were evaluated on pathological materials. We used a percentage of labeled thyrocytes score (0, no labeling; 1, <30%; 2, 31-60%; 3, >60%) and an intensity score (0, no staining; 1, weak; 2, intermediate; 3, strong). The sum of two scores were accepted as the total score. Results: Mean ages of the FA, IN-FVPTC, and NIFTP groups were 44.7 ± 11.7 years, 46.9 ± 13.6 years, 43.2 ± 15.4 years, respectively and the mean VEGF immunostaining scores were 44.7 ± 29.3, 50.2 ± 32.54, 4 ± 26.3 respectively. Although there was no statistically significant difference (p= 0.347), the total score of the NIFTPs was higher than the scores of the FA (mean= 3.9 ± 1.8) and IN-FVPTC(mean= 4.3 ± 1.9) groups with a mean value of 4.6 ± 1.7. This result was remarkable. There was no statistically significant difference between tumor diameters and staining percentages (p= 0.750). Conclusion: Even if there were no statistical differences for VEGF immunostaining, it was high in NIFTPs. Since we know the role of VEGF in tumorigenesis, we can hypothesize that NIPTP can be precancerous. Our argue should be corroborated by a large prospective study.
Authors: Yuri E Nikiforov; Raja R Seethala; Giovanni Tallini; Zubair W Baloch; Fulvio Basolo; Lester D R Thompson; Justine A Barletta; Bruce M Wenig; Abir Al Ghuzlan; Kennichi Kakudo; Thomas J Giordano; Venancio A Alves; Elham Khanafshar; Sylvia L Asa; Adel K El-Naggar; William E Gooding; Steven P Hodak; Ricardo V Lloyd; Guy Maytal; Ozgur Mete; Marina N Nikiforova; Vania Nosé; Mauro Papotti; David N Poller; Peter M Sadow; Arthur S Tischler; R Michael Tuttle; Kathryn B Wall; Virginia A LiVolsi; Gregory W Randolph; Ronald A Ghossein Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: David N Parente; Wouter P Kluijfhout; Pim J Bongers; Raoul Verzijl; Karen M Devon; Lorne E Rotstein; David P Goldstein; Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete; Jesse D Pasternak Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Vasily V Vasko; Jean Gaudart; Claude Allasia; Victoria Savchenko; Julie Di Cristofaro; Motoyasu Saji; Matthew D Ringel; Catherine De Micco Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Anna M Sawka; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Patrizio Caturegli; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; John C Morris; Aziza Nassar; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Hilary Somerset; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; Leonard Wartofsky; Michelle D Williams Journal: Thyroid Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 6.568