| Literature DB >> 35873155 |
Theo G M Oliveira1,2,3, Gabriela Venturini1,4, Juliana M Alvim1, Larissa L Feijó3, Carla L Dinardo3, Ester C Sabino5, Jonathan G Seidman4, Christine E Seidman4,6,7, Jose E Krieger1,2, Alexandre C Pereira1,2,4.
Abstract
Chagas disease is a tropical zoonosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. After infection, the host present an acute phase, usually asymptomatic, in which an extensive parasite proliferation and intense innate immune activity occurs, followed by a chronic phase, characterized by low parasitemia and development of specific immunity. Most individuals in the chronic phase remain without symptoms or organ damage, a state called indeterminate IND form. However, 20 to 40% of individuals develop cardiac or gastrointestinal complications at any time in life. Cardiomyocytes have an important role in the development of Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy (CCC) due to transcriptional and metabolic alterations that are crucial for the parasite survival and replication. However, it still not clear why some infected individuals progress to a cardiomyopathy phase, while others remain asymptomatic. In this work, we used hiPSCs-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) to investigate patterns of infection, proliferation and transcriptional response in IND and CCC patients. Our data show that T. cruzi infection and proliferation efficiency do not differ significantly in PBMCs and hiPSC-CM from both groups. However, RNA-seq analysis in hiPSC-CM infected for 24 hours showed a significantly different transcriptional response to the parasite in cells from IND or CCC patients. Cardiomyocytes from IND showed significant differences in the expression of genes related to antigen processing and presentation, as well as, immune co-stimulatory molecules. Furthermore, the downregulation of collagen production genes and extracellular matrix components was significantly different in these cells. Cardiomyocytes from CCC, in turn, showed increased expression of mTORC1 pathway and unfolded protein response genes, both associated to increased intracellular ROS production. These data point to a differential pattern of response, determined by baseline genetic differences between groups, which may have an impact on the development of a chronic outcome with or without the presentation of cardiac symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-Seq; Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi); cardiomyocytes (CMs); chagas cardiomyopathy; chagas disease; iPSC (induced pluripotent stem cell)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873155 PMCID: PMC9301326 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.904747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 1Results from infection assay of PBMCs by flow cytometry with GFP-expressing Y strain. (A) The infection rate over time points was analyzed through the percentage of GFP+ events in Monocytes, T and B Lymphocytes. (B) The proliferation rate over time points was analyzed through the GFP intensity across times points in Monocytes, T and B Lymphocytes. (C) The 48/24 hpi GFP intensity ratio was used to calculate the proliferation between 24 and 48 hpi in Monocytes, T and B Lymphocytes. (n = 5 CCC; 5 IND and 5 Non-infected controls). The symbol *** means P ≤ 0.001.
Figure 2Results from hiPSC-CM infection assay with GFP-expressing Y strain. (A) hiPSC-CM were infected with T. cruzi Y strain modified to express GFP in the amastigote form. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue) (Left panel bars = 40µm). (B) Time course (3, 6, 24 and 48 hpi) analysis of infection in hiPSC-CM from IND and CCC patients. Nuclei and amastigotes were counted in a custom script and the Parasite/Nucleus ratio was compared along time points. (n = 3 CCC and 2 IND). n.s., not significant.
Figure 3RNA-seq results. (A) PCA plot showing the variability among CCC and IND replicates at 0 and 24 hpi (CCC replicates = 6 CCC_0hpi, 6 CCC_24hpi. IND replicates = 4 IND_0hpi and 4 IND_24hpi). (B) Hierarchical clustering of replicates. (C) Volcano plot showing the L2FC distribution of DEGs in the interaction term output.
Figure 4Results from GSEA with Hallmark terms. (A) GSEA plots showing the rank distribution of DEGs in Hallmark gene sets and the association with each phenotype (red bars – CCC; blue bars – IND). (B) Reactome plot with the NES for the pathways associated to each group. (C) Hallmark gene sets associated with each phenotype. ES, Enrichment Score; NES, Normalized enrichment score; FDR, False-discovery rate.
Figure 5Heat maps showing the normalize expression of significant DEGs across conditions in their respective Hallmark gene set. Samples were normalized by the mean counts. Below each heat map the boxplots show the level of gene expression at every time point (0 or 24 hpi) for each group (CCC or IND).
Figure 6HLA expression pathways in IND and CCC cardiomyocytes. (A) DEGs were plotted against KEGG antigen processing and presentation pathway and both MHC I and MHC II pathways had a positive association with IND (green – IND association; red – CCC association). (B) Heat maps showing the normalized expression of HLA Class I and Class II genes across all conditions. *DEGs with statistical significance.