| Literature DB >> 35870981 |
Cong Luo1,2, Ye Zhang2,3, Yu-Shi Zhang4, Ming-Xin Zhang5, Jun Ning1,2, Min-Feng Chen1,2, Yuan Li1,2, Lin Qi1,2, Xiong-Bing Zu1,2, Yang-Le Li6,7, Yi Cai8,9.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between the genotype and renal phenotype in a Chinese cohort and guide clinical decision-making for treating tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).Entities:
Keywords: Genotype; Renal phenotype; TSC1; TSC2; Tuberous sclerosis complex
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35870981 PMCID: PMC9308181 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02443-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.303
Fig. 1TSC1 and TSC2 gene mutation spectrum in Chinese patients. A The proportion of TSC1, TSC2 gene and NMI in the cohort; B the mutation types of TSC1; C the mutation types of TSC2; D the distribution of various mutation types in TSC1; E the distribution of various mutation types in TSC2
New variants detected by next-generation sequencing
| No | Sex | Age | Mutant | Nucleotide change | Protein change | Mutation type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 16 | c. 605_606insA | Phe202Leufs*16 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 2 | Female | 57 | c.1018G > T | Glu340* | Nonsense mutations | |
| 3 | Female | 24 | c.361A > T | Lys121* | Nonsense mutations | |
| 4 | Female | 36 | c.3683_3684 insG | Leu1228Leufs*6 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 5 | Female | 36 | c.788_789 insC | Leu263Leufs*75 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 6 | Male | 30 | c.2738_2739 insT | Thr913Thrfs*2 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 7 | Male | 31 | c.4006_4007 insC | Ser1336Serfs*78 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 8 | Female | 30 | c.3601_3602 insGGCCC | Thr1203Glyfs*9 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 9 | Female | 46 | c.203_204 insA | Ala68Alafs*7 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 10 | Male | 16 | c.3271insTCCG | Gly1091Valfs*78 | Frameshift mutations | |
| 11 | Female | 29 | c.1258G > T | Glu420* | Nonsense mutations | |
| 12 | Female | 50 | c.4972A > T | Lys1658* | Nonsense mutations | |
| 13 | Female | 24 | c.3838G > T | Gln1280* | Nonsense mutations | |
| 14 | Female | 23 | c.2319 delA | Leu773Leufs*56 | Frameshift mutations |
Clinical characteristics by genotype in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex
| (n = 21) | (n = 107) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), median (range) | 30 (6–54) | 31 (4–59) | 0.37 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 4 | 48 | |
| Female | 17 | 59 | |
| Familial/de novo | |||
| Familial | 6 | 10 | |
| De novo | 15 | 97 | |
| Major criteria | |||
| Angiofibromas (≥ 3) or forehead | 14/21 | 88/107 | 0.10 |
| Hypomelanotic macules (≥ 3) | 15/21 | 85/107 | 0.42 |
| Ungual fibromas (≥ 2) | 7/21 | 57/107 | 0.095 |
| Chagrin patch | 10/21 | 61/107 | 0.42 |
| Multiple retinal hamartomas | 3/15 | 11/81 | 0.45 |
| Cortical dysplasia | 2/21 | 12/107 | 0.99 |
| SEN | 20/21 | 86/107 | 0.12 |
| SEGA | 1/21 | 4/104 | 0.99 |
| Cardiac rhabdomyoma | 3/19 | 5/102 | 0.11 |
| LAM (women) | 6/18 | 26/105 | 0.064 |
| Renal AML (≥ 2) | 20/21 | 103/107 | 0.99 |
| Minor criteria | |||
| Confetti skin lesions | 3/21 | 19/107 | 0.99 |
| Dental enamel pits (≥ 3) | 5/21 | 15/106 | 0.27 |
| Intraoral fibromas (≥ 2) | 2/21 | 12/106 | 0.99 |
| Retinal achromatic patch | 0/14 | 0/76 | – |
| Non-renal hamartomas | 5/20 | 22/105 | 0.69 |
| Multiple renal cysts | 1/20 | 12/106 | 0.69 |
SEN subependymal nodules, SEGA subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, LAM lymphagioleiomatosis, AML angiomyolipomas
Renal complications by genotype in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex
| (n = 21) | (n = 107) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Renal AML | |||
| AML | 20/21 | 104/107 | 0.52 |
| Bilateral AML | 19/21 | 103/107 | 0.26 |
| Diameter of the largest AML (cm) | 4.2 ± 1.7 | 5.6 ± 4.0 | 0.11 |
| Volume of largest AML (cm3) | 34 ± 39 | 159 ± 440 | 0.20 |
| AML stage | |||
| ≤ 4 | 18 | 66 | |
| > 4 | 3 | 41 | |
| Surgery/invasive procedure | 7/21 | 54/107 | 0.15 |
| Renal embolization | 6/21 | 31/107 | 0.97 |
| Nephrectomy/partial | 2/21 | 35/107 | |
| mTOR Medication (Everolimus) | 4/21 | 68/107 | |
| Renal cysts | 0.69 | ||
| Yes | 1 | 12 | |
| No | 20 | 94 | |
| Renal cell carcinomas | 0.52 | ||
| Yes | 1 | 3 | |
| No | 20 | 104 | |
| Ccr (ml/min) | 95 ± 20 | 90 ± 31 | 0.54 |
| CKD stage | 0.073 | ||
| ≤ 2 | 20 | 82 | |
| > 2 | 1 | 25 | |
| PKD | 0.99 | ||
| Yes | 0 | 3 | |
| No | 21 | 104 |
AML angiomyolipomas, Ccr endogenous creatinine clearance rate, CKD chronic kidney disease, PKD polycystic kidney disease
Response of angiomyolipoma volume to everolimus by genotype
| (n = 4) | (n = 68) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AML volume at baseline (mean ± SD, cm3) | 70 ± 76 | 235 ± 538 | 0.54 |
| Age range (years) | 29–45 | 16–59 | 0.079 |
| Median age (years) | 36 | 34 | |
| Sex | 0.63 | ||
| Male | 2 | 25 | |
| Female | 2 | 43 | |
| Familial/de novo | 0.17 | ||
| Familial | 2 | 12 | |
| De novo | 2 | 56 | |
| Everolimus (3 months) | |||
| No. of response (%) | 3 (75) | 52 (76) | 0.99 |
| % reduction from baseline value (mean ± SD, %) | 39 ± 14 | 38 ± 17 | 0.89 |
| Everolimus (6 months) | |||
| No. of response (%) | 4 (100) | 56 (85) | 0.99 |
| % reduction from baseline value (mean ± SD, %) | 41 ± 15 | 43 ± 18 | 0.87 |
AML angiomyolipomas