| Literature DB >> 29697822 |
J Chris Kingswood1, Elena Belousova2, Mirjana P Benedik3, Tom Carter4, Vincent Cottin5, Paolo Curatolo6, Maria Dahlin7, Lisa D' Amato8, Guillaume Beaure d'Augères9, Petrus J de Vries10, José C Ferreira11, Martha Feucht12, Carla Fladrowski13,14, Christoph Hertzberg15, Sergiusz Jozwiak16,17, John A Lawson18, Alfons Macaya19, Ruben Marques8,20, Rima Nabbout21, Finbar O'Callaghan22, Jiong Qin23, Valentin Sander24, Matthias Sauter25, Seema Shah26, Yukitoshi Takahashi27, Renaud Touraine28, Sotiris Youroukos29, Bernard Zonnenberg30, Anna C Jansen31.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal angiomyolipoma occurs at a high frequency in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and is associated with potentially life-threatening complications. Despite this frequency and severity, there are no large population-based cohort studies. Here we present baseline and follow-up data of the international TuberOus SClerosis registry to increase disease Awareness (TOSCA) with an aim to provide detailed clinical characteristics of renal angiomyolipoma among patients with TSC.Entities:
Keywords: TOSCA; mTOR Inhibitor; registry; renal angiomyolipoma; tuberous sclerosis complex
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 29697822 PMCID: PMC6399480 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant ISSN: 0931-0509 Impact factor: 5.992
Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics (N = 2216)
| Characteristics | Baseline data |
|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis of TSC | 1 (<1–69) |
| Gender, | |
| Male | 1062 (47.9) |
| Female | 1154 (52.1) |
| Patients with molecular testing, | 1000 (45.1) |
| Genetic testing, | |
| No mutation identified | 144 (14.4) |
| | 197 (19.7) |
| | 644 (64.4) |
| Both | 6 (0.6) |
| Variation type, | |
| Pathogenic mutation | 678 (67.8) |
| Variant of unknown significance | 66 (6.6) |
| Patients with prenatal diagnosis, | 144 (6.5) |
| Patients with at least one blood relative participating in TOSCA, | 230 (10.4) |
Data available for 2216 patients.
Information on the type of mutation was missing for nine patients.
The count (n) includes six patients who had both TSC1 and TSC2 mutations.
The count (n) includes 23 patients who had both variation types.
FIGURE 1Patients with history of renal angiomyolipoma across age groups. Percentage of patients with renal angiomyolipoma in each age group was calculated considering the total number of patients in that age group as the denominator.
Renal angiomyolipoma features according to mutation type
| Characteristics | Overall ( | Patients with | Patients with | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | First follow- up visit | Baseline | First follow- up visit | Baseline | First follow- up visit | |
| History of renal angiomyolipoma | 1070 (51.8) | 992 (55.8) | 63 (33.3) | 61 (36.5) | 369 (59.2) | 344 (62.0) |
| Mean (range) age at diagnosis, years* | 16.9 (<1–67) | – | 23.5 (<1–60) | – | 13.2 (<1–59) | – |
| Angiomyolipoma present at the time of assessment | 1031 (96.4) | 917 (92.4) | 58 (92.1) | 60 (98.4) | 357 (96.7) | 309 (89.8) |
| Multiple | 911 (88.4) | 808 (81.5) | 41 (70.7) | 43 (70.5) | 330 (92.4) | 278 (80.8) |
| Bilateral | 865 (83.9) | 770 (77.6) | 29 (50.0) | 33 (54.1) | 308 (86.3) | 260 (75.6) |
| Angiomyolipoma size >3 cm* | 354 (34.3) | 302 (30.4) | 7 (12.0) | 10 (16.4) | 114 (31.9) | 98 (28.5) |
| Growing angiomyolipoma† | 218 (21.1) | 173 (17.4) | 7 (12.0) | 9 (14.8) | 86 (24.1) | 70 (20.3) |
| Signs and symptoms | ||||||
| None‡ | 845 (82.0) | 801 (87.4) | 52 (89.7) | 55 (91.7) | 297 (83.2) | 272 (88.0) |
| Pain not otherwise specified | 63 (6.1) | 34 (3.7) | 2 (3.4) | 2 (3.3) | 24 (6.7) | 11 (3.6) |
| Elevated blood pressure | 59 (5.7) | 47 (5.1) | 4 (6.9) | 3 (5.0) | 23 (6.4) | 20 (6.5) |
| Haemorrhage | 52 (5.0) | 14 (1.5) | 0 | 0 | 18 (5.0) | 5 (1.6) |
| Haematuria | 44 (4.3) | 30 (3.3) | 0 | 0 | 15 (4.2) | 10 (3.2) |
| Impaired renal function | 40 (3.9) | 30 (3.3) | 1 (1.7) | 1 (1.7) | 10 (2.8) | 8 (2.6) |
| Other | 33 (3.2) | 11 (1.2) | 0 | 0 | 10 (2.8) | 3 (1.0) |
| Treatment | ||||||
| Patients received treatment† | 309 (28.9) | 272 (27.4) | 8 (12.7) | 5 (8.2) | 99 (26.8) | 84 (24.4) |
| Type of treatment | ||||||
| Embolization | 142 (46.0) | 8 (2.9) | 2 (25.0) | 0 | 41 (41.4) | 2 (2.4) |
| mTOR inhibitor | 134 (43.4) | 35 (12.9) | 3 (37.5) | 0 | 51 (51.5) | 8 (9.5) |
| Nephrectomy | 62 (20.1) | 5 (1.8) | 3 (37.5) | 0 | 22 (22.2) | 1 (1.2) |
| Resection | 20 (6.5) | 1 (0.4) | 1 (12.5) | 0 | 5 (5.1) | 0 |
| Dialysis | 3 (1.0) | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.2) |
| Other | 13 (4.2) | 1 (0.4) | 0 | 0 | 3 (3.0) | 0 |
Values are presented as n (%), unless otherwise specified.
TSC1 vs TSC2 at baseline: *P < 0.01; †P < 0.05; ‡P = 0.77.
Percentage were calculated based on number of patients with at least one renal imaging.
Used alone or in combination with other treatment modalities; at baseline in overall population, embolization as single agent was used in 102 of 142 patients; mTOR inhibitors as single agent were used in 87 of 134 patients; nephrectomy as single modality was used in 34 of 62 patients and resection as single modality was used in 11 of 20 patients.
Dialysis was used only in combination with other treatment modalities.
Treatment modalities according to age
| Treatment modalities | Age at consent for patients with history of renal angiomyolipoma, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤2 ( | >2 to ≤5 ( | >5 to ≤9 ( | >9 to ≤14 ( | >14 to ≤18 ( | >18 to ≤40 ( | >40 ( | |
| Patients received treatment, | 1 (4.0) | 1 (1.3) | 11 (8.2) | 24 (15.1) | 27 (26.0) | 158 (40.2) | 87 (48.6) |
| Type of treatment | |||||||
| Dialysis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.3) | 1 (1.1) |
| Embolization | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.3) | 7 (25.9) | 83 (52.5) | 50 (57.5) |
| Nephrectomy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (8.3) | 3 (11.1) | 29 (18.4) | 28 (32.2) |
| Resection | 0 | 0 | 1 (9.1) | 1 (4.2) | 3 (11.1) | 10 (6.3) | 5 (5.7) |
| mTOR inhibitor | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 11 (100.0) | 17 (70.8) | 16 (59.3) | 67 (42.4) | 21 (24.1) |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 (5.7) | 4 (4.6) |
Used alone or in combination with other treatment modalities.