| Literature DB >> 29587809 |
Yi Cai1, Hao Guo1, Wenda Wang1, Hanzhong Li1, Hao Sun2, Bing Shi2, Yushi Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by the development of numerous benign tumors. Renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) occur in up to 80% of TSC patients, which is a leading cause of TSC-related death in adult patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of everolimus in Chinese patients of TSC associated with RAML(TSC-RAML).Entities:
Keywords: Angiomyolipoma; Everolimus; Safety; Treatment outcome; Tuberous sclerosis complex
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29587809 PMCID: PMC5870799 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-018-0781-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Baseline patient demographic and disease characteristics
| Everlimus ( | |
|---|---|
| Age in years, median (range) | 29(20~ 46) |
| < 30 year | 9(50%) |
| ≥ 30 year | 9(50%) |
| Sex | |
| Women | 12(66.7%) |
| Men | 6(33.3%) |
| Gene mutation | |
| TSC1 | 0(0%) |
| TSC2 | 18(100%) |
| Diagnosis of lymphangioleiomyomatosis | 6(33.3%) |
| Skin lesion(≥1) | 18(100%) |
| Presence of subepedymal giant cell astrocytoma | 1(5.6%) |
| Longest diameter of the largest renal angiomyolipoma lesion | |
| ≥ 8 cm | 14(77.8%) |
| ≥ 4 cm and < 8 cm | 4(22.2%) |
| < 4 cm | 0(0%) |
| Sum of volumes of target renal angiomyolipoma lesions, cm3 | |
| Mean (SD) | 1974 (2406) |
| Median (range) | 1247 (60.77~ 9079) |
| Bilateral angiomyolipoma | 16(88.9%) |
| Number of target angiomyolipoma lesions | |
| 1~ 2 | 11(61.1%) |
| 3~ 4 | 7(38.9%) |
| Previous angiomyolipoma therapy | |
| Surgery/invasive procedure | 6(33.3%) |
| Renal embolisation | 2(11.1%) |
| Partial nephrectomy | 2(11.1%) |
| Nephrectomy | 2(11.1%) |
| Medication | 0(0%) |
Response of angiomyolipoma volume to everolimus therapy
| 3 months | 6 months | 12 months | 18 months | 24 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n) | 18 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 14 |
| No. of response (n,%) | 9 (52.94%) | 10 (58.82%) | 10 (66.67%) | 5(33.33%) | 1(7.14%) |
| a% of baseline value (Mean ± SD,%) | 47.73 ± 19.81 | 44.27 ± 23.69 | 41.14 ± 26.54 | 60.67 ± 23.28 | 77.62 ± 16.66 |
| 0.002 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.014 |
athe average percentage change of baseline in the total volume of all target AML lesions
Fig. 1Renal Angiomyolipoma Volume in the Patients with the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex during the Study. Panel a shows the renal angiomyolipoma volume at each visit is expressed as a percentage of the baseline size. The dashed line represents 50% of the baseline value; data below the line indicate that the mean angiomyolipoma volume was reduced by 50% or more. Panel b shows the mean change (in milliliters) from the baseline values for renal angiomyolipoma volume. I bars indicate the standard errors
Fig. 2Target Renal Angiomyolipomas of a Patient with the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Panel a shows the target renal angiomyolipoma volume (in milliliters) at baseline. Panel b, c and d shows the target renal angiomyolipoma volume (in milliliters) after 3, 6 and 12 months of everolimus therapy. Panel e and f shows the target renal angiomyolipoma volume (in milliliters) at 6 and 12 months after stopping everolimus
Pulmonary Structural and Functional Characteristics of Patients with Lymphangioleiomyomatosis
| Value | Baseline | 12 months | 24 months | Change from Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 months ( | 24 months ( | ||||
| FEV1 | |||||
| Least-square mean — liters | 1.59 ± 0.41 | 1.87 ± 0.47 | 1.65 ± 0.45 | 0.28 ± 0.08 ( | 0.13 ± 0.05 ( |
| Percent of predicted value | 58.51 ± 11.09 | 65.32 ± 12.32 | 59.89 ± 11.58 | 6.81 ± 2.28 ( | 3.46 ± 1.57 ( |
| FVC | |||||
| Least-square mean — liters | 2.77 ± 0.56 | 3.20 ± 0.68 | 2.95 ± 0.66 | 0.43 ± 0.17 ( | 0.27 ± 0.14 ( |
| Percent of predicted value | 79.90 ± 12.68 | 87.16 ± 12.63 | 84.36 ± 13.71 | 7.26 ± 2.16 ( | 6.39 ± 1.36 ( |
| Total lung capacity | |||||
| Least-square mean — liters | 5.16 ± 0.51 | 5.18 ± 0.44 | 5.14 ± 0.49 | 0.03 ± 0.12 ( | 0.04 ± 0.10 ( |
| Percent of predicted value | 99.21 ± 7.01 | 99.70 ± 7.28 | 97.75 ± 7.24 | 0.49 ± 1.47 ( | −0.22 ± 0.78 ( |
| Residual volume | |||||
| Least-square mean — liters | 2.39 ± 0.10 | 1.98 ± 0.31 | 2.11 ± 0.29 | −0.41 ± 0.24 ( | −0.31 ± 0.23 ( |
| Percent of predicted value | 124.56 ± 10.04 | 104.23 ± 8.85 | 112.30 ± 5.41 | −20.32 ± 1.62 ( | −15.79 ± 2.38 ( |
| DLco | |||||
| Least-square mean — ml/mmHg/min | 12.93 ± 2.42 | 13.00 ± 2.41 | 12.59 ± 2.39 | 0.07 ± 0.46 ( | −0.21 ± 0.55 ( |
| Percent of predicted value | 53.40 ± 9.29 | 53.60 ± 8.70 | 54.27 ± 9.56 | 0.19 ± 1.39 ( | 1.68 ± 2.11 ( |
Data are listed for 6 patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis who completed the 12-month study visit. Data for the 24-month study visit were available for 5 of these 6 patients; 1 patient had withdrawn during the second year. Changes from baseline were not significant unless otherwise indicated. DLco denotes diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC forced vital capacity
Fig. 3Pulmonary Function in Patients with Lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Panel a shows the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) for each patient. Panel b shows the forced vital capacity (FVC) for each patient. Panel c shows the mean change (in milliliters) from the baseline values for FEV1 and for FVC. I bars indicate the standard errors. Panel d shows the residual volume for each patient
Fig. 4Facial angiofibromas of a Patient with the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Panel a shows the facial angiofibromas at baseline. Panel b shows the facial angiofibromas improvement after 12 months of everolimus therapy
Adverse events by preferred term, regardless of relationship to everolimus
| n(%) | Everolimus ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | |
| Mucositis oral | 18(100%) | 2(11.1%) | – | – |
| Irregular menstruation | 11(91.7%) | 3(25.0%) | – | – |
| Abdominal pain | 14(77.8%) | 1(5.6%) | – | – |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 13(72.2%) | – | – | – |
| Headache | 12(66.7%) | – | – | – |
| Diarrhea | 11(61.1%) | – | – | – |
| Upper respiratory infection | 10(55.6%) | – | – | – |
| Proteinuria | 9(50%) | 1(5.6%) | – | – |
| Malaise | 9(50%) | – | – | – |
| Rash acneiform | 8(44.4%) | – | – | – |
| Cholesterol high | 8(44.4%) | – | – | – |
| Fever | 6(33.3%) | – | – | – |
| Urinary tract infection | 5(27.8%) | – | – | – |
| Hematuria | 5(27.8%) | – | – | – |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | 5(27.8%) | – | – | – |
| Constipation | 4(22.2%) | – | – | – |
| GGT increased | 4(22.2%) | – | – | – |
| Hypophosphatemia | 4(22.2%) | – | – | – |
| Seizures | 3(16.7%) | – | – | – |
| Pneumonitis | 2(11.1%) | 1(5.6%) | – | 1(5.6%) |
| Vomiting | 2(11.1%) | 1(5.6%) | – | – |
| Lymphocyte count decreased | 2(11.1%) | – | – | – |
| Anemia | 2(11.1%) | – | – | – |
| Renal hemorrhage | 1(5.6%) | – | – | 1(5.6%) |
| Neutrophil count decreased | 1(5.6%) | – | – | – |
| Hyperuricemia | 1(5.6%) | – | – | – |
| Creatinine increased | 1(5.6%) | – | – | – |