| Literature DB >> 35869469 |
Jinling Song1, Zhongwu Li2, Lujing Yang2, Maomao Wei3, Zhi Yang3, Xuejuan Wang4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Identification of microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial for screening patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. We aim to investigate whether the metabolic characteristics is related to MSI status and can be used to predict the MSI-H CRC.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Metabolic tumor volume; Microsatellite instability; Positron emission tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35869469 PMCID: PMC9306059 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09871-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.638
Fig. 1Flow diagram outlining criteria used for patient inclusion and exclusion
Clinical characteristics of patients
| Variable | Number of the subjects( | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 254(60.5) | |
| Female | 166(39.5) | |
| < 52 | 100(23.8) | |
| ≥52 | 320(76.2) | |
| Left hemi-colon | 302(71.9) | |
| Right hemi-colon | 118(28.1) | |
| poorly/moderately-poorly | 56(14.1) | |
| moderately /highly | 340(85.9) | |
| Yes | 34(10.0) | |
| No | 386(90.0) | |
| T2–3 | 299(71.2) | |
| T4 | 121(28.8) | |
| N0 | 174(41.4) | |
| N1–2 | 246(58.6) | |
| M0 | 333(79.3) | |
| M1 | 87(20.7) | |
| Absent | 376(89.5) | |
| Present | 44(10.5) |
The data presented are number (%) of patients
Correlations between patient characteristics and MSI status in CRC patients
| CRC with MSI-H( | CRC with MSS( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, median, (range) | 56.5(24–84) | 61(18–87) | 0.048* |
| Male: female ratio | 29:15 | 225:151 | 0.436# |
| Primary lesion (right: left hemi-colon) | 26:18 | 92:284 | < 0.001# |
| Histologic grade (poorly/moderately-poorly: moderately /highly) | 11:31 | 45:309 | 0.018# |
| Mucinous carcinoma (yes: no) | 3:50 | 31:338 | 0.686# |
| T stage (T2–3: T4) | 39:12 | 260:108 | 0.152# |
| N stage (N0: N1–2) | 26:25 | 148:220 | 0.225# |
| M stage (M0: M1) | 45:7 | 287:80 | 0.507# |
| SUVmax, median(range) | 13.81(5.97–47.06) | 13.78(4.10–54.73) | 0.502* |
| SUVmean, median(range) | 7.29(3.67–16.22) | 7.95(2.81–22.70) | 0.319* |
| MTV, median(range) | 33.60(1.34–183.42) | 18.08(1.86–391.04) | 0.004* |
| TLG, median(range) | 229.03(5.36–1540.76) | 134.26(7.25–2634.39) | 0.010* |
SUV the maximum standardized uptake values, SUV mean standardized uptake values, MTV metabolic tumor volume, TLG total lesion glycolysis
p values were calculated using the *Mann–Whitney U-test and #χ2 test
Fig. 2A ROC curve of MTV for predicting MSI-H. Sensitivity and specificity were 52.3 and 76.6% (area under curve (AUC) value = 0.633; P = 0.004). B ROC curve of TLG for predicting MSI-H. Sensitivity and specificity were 43.2 and 80.9% (area under curve (AUC) value = 0.619; P = 0.010). C Correlation between Age and MSI status in CRC. Younger patients prone to encounter in MSI-positive CRC [56.5(24–84) vs. 61(18–87); P = 0.048]. D Correlation between primary lesion and MSI status in CRC. MSS were located predominantly in the left hemi-colon (75.5%), whereas more than half of the MSI-H colorectal cancers were found in the right (59.1%, P < 0.001). E Correlation between MTV and MSI status in CRC. MTV was significantly higher in tumors with MSI-H than in those with MSS (33.60 vs.18.08; P = 0.004). F Correlation between primary tumor TLG and MSI status in CRC. TLG was significantly higher in tumors with MSI-H than in those with MSS (229.03 vs. 134.26; P = 0.010)
Fig. 3Representative pictures of intratumoral inflammatory cell infiltration by Hematoxylin-Eosin staining (× 20). A High density of inflammatory cell infiltration in MSI-H CRC. B Low density of inflammatory cell infiltration in MSS CRC
Fig. 4Representative Immunohistochemical detection of CD8 and CD3 (× 20) expression in slides of MSI-H CRC (A, B) and MSS CRC (C, D)
Logistic regression analysis for MSI in CRC patients
| Variables | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (< 52 vs. ≥52 years) | 2.22 | 1.10–4.47 | 0.026 |
| Sex (male vs. female) | 0.74 | 0.32–1.71 | 0.484 |
| Primary lesion (right vs. left hemi-colon) | 4.72 | 1.89–8.95 | < 0.001 |
| Histologic grade (poorly/moderately-poorly vs. moderately /highly) | 0.65 | 0.24–1.75 | 0.391 |
| Mucinous carcinoma (yes vs. no) | 0.731 | 0.14–3.85 | 0.712 |
| T stage (T2–3 vs. T4) | 0.518 | 0.18–1.48 | 0.219 |
| N stage (N0 vs. N1–2) | 0.67 | 0.30–1.48 | 0.322 |
| M stage (M0 vs. M1) | 0.95 | 0.33–2.77 | 0.928 |
| SUVmax (< 14.74 vs. ≥14.74) | 0.96 | 0.37–2.48 | 0.935 |
| SUVmean (< 9.28 vs. ≥9.28) | 0.44 | 0.15–1.31 | 0.140 |
| MTV (≥32.19 vs. < 32.19) | 2.34 | 1.19–4.61 | 0.014 |
| TLG (≥352.72 vs. < 352.72) | 1.44 | 0.49–4.26 | 0.512 |
Fig. 5A a 45-year-old male had right colon cancer. 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans showed intense accumulation of 18F-FDG in the tumor (arrow; MTV,37.26; TLG,494.44). IHC analysis revealed MSI-H(MLH1(−) and PMS2(−)) after surgical resection. Scale bars, 100 mm. B a 55-year-old male had sigmoid colon cancer. 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans showed high accumulation of 18F-FDG in the tumor (arrow; MTV, 12.11; TLG,114.91). IHC analysis revealed MSS after surgical resection. Scale bars, 100 mm