| Literature DB >> 32302443 |
Kengo Kuriyama1, Tamami Higuchi2, Takehiko Yokobori3, Hideyuki Saito1, Tomonori Yoshida1, Keigo Hara1, Shigemasa Suzuki1, Makoto Sakai1, Makoto Sohda1, Tetsuya Higuchi4, Yoshito Tsushima4, Takayuki Asao2, Kyoichi Kaira5, Hiroyuki Kuwano1, Ken Shirabe6, Hiroshi Saeki1.
Abstract
The relationship between the local immune status and cancer metabolism regarding 18 F-FDG and 18 F-FAMT uptake in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unknown. The present study examined the correlations between tumor immune status, clinicopathological factors, and positron emission tomography (PET) tracer uptake in ESCC. Forty-one ESCC patients who underwent 18 F-FDG PET and 18 F-FAMT PET before surgery were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemistry was conducted for programmed death 1 (PD-1), CD8, Ki-67, CD34, GLUT1 (18 F-FDG transporter) and LAT1 (18 F-FAMT transporter). ESCC specimens with high tumoral PD-L1 and high CD8-positive lymphocytes were considered to have "hot tumor immune status." High PD-L1 expression (53.7%) was significantly associated with tumor/lymphatic/venous invasion (P = 0.028, 0.032 and 0.018), stage (P = 0.041), CD8-positive lymphocytes (P < 0.001), GLUT1 (P < 0.001), LAT1 expression (P = 0.006), Ki-67 labelling index (P = 0.009) and CD34-positive vessel counts (P < 0.001). SUVmax of 18 F-FDG was significantly higher in high PD-L1 cases than in low PD-L1 cases (P = 0.009). SUVmax of 18 F-FAMT was significantly higher in high PD-L1 (P < 0.001), high CD8 (P = 0.012) and hot tumor groups (P = 0.028) than in other groups. High SUVmax of 18 F-FAMT (≥4.15) was identified as the only predictor of hot tumor immune status. High PET tracer uptake was significantly associated with cancer aggressiveness and hot tumor immune status in ESCC. PET imaging may be an effective tool to predict tumor immune status in ESCC with respect to immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: CD8; FAMT-PET; FDG-PET; PD-L1; esophageal cancer; hot tumor
Year: 2020 PMID: 32302443 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Sci ISSN: 1347-9032 Impact factor: 6.716