| Literature DB >> 35865645 |
Ying Liu1, Ran Huo1, Huimin Xu1, Guangjin Zhou1, Tao Wang2, Huishu Yuan1, Xihai Zhao3.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the associations between carotid plaque characteristics and perioperative cerebral blood flow (CBF) by arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: arterial spin labeling; carotid atherosclerosis; carotid endarterectomy; cerebral blood flow; magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865645 PMCID: PMC9295123 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.899957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Clinical characteristic of study population (n = 61).
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| 66.6 ± 7.8 | 52–85 | |
| 55 (90.2) | - | |
|
| 41 (67.2) | - |
| SBP, mm Hg | 132.1 ± 16.4 | 91–200 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 80.3 ± 9.0 | 60–100 |
|
| 33 (54.1) | - |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.7–2.0 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.2 ± 0.8 | 0.9–4.2 |
| TC, mmol/L | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 2.4–6.1 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 0.4–3.1 |
|
| 23 (37.7) | - |
| Glu, mmol/L | 6.1 ± 1.5 | 4.2–11.3 |
|
| 37 (60.7) | - |
|
| 40 (65.6) | - |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; Glu, glucose. The categorical variables were described as percentage and continuous variables were described as median and interquartile range.
Carotid plaque characteristics of study population (n = 61).
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Mean lumen area, mm2 | 26.1 (21.1, 32.6) |
| Mean wall area, mm2 | 41.6 (31.6, 56.2) |
| Mean total vessel area, mm2 | 67.4 (57.5, 87.6) |
| Maximum wall thickness, mm | 6.0 (4.8, 7.3) |
| Mean normalized wall index, % | 61.8 (55.8, 66.0) |
| Stenosis, % | 74.5 (68.8, 82.1) |
|
| |
| LRNC | 52 (85.2) |
| IPH | 28 (45.9) |
| Calcification | 48 (78.7) |
| Ulcer | 15 (24.6) |
| FCR | 32 (52.5) |
|
| |
| LRNC, mm3 | 416.6 (159.1, 789.7) |
| IPH, mm3 | 374.9 (159.9, 688.7) |
| Calcification, mm3 | 41.3 (14.5, 74.7) |
| Ulcer, mm3 | 19.3 (6.2, 44.3) |
|
| |
| LRNC, % | 62.5 (38.1, 72.1) |
| IPH, % | 50.7 (35.4, 61.4) |
| Calcification, % | 8.8 (5.6, 16.6) |
| Ulcer, % | 4.4 (3.3, 17.9) |
LRNC, lipid-rich necrotic core; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage. All the measurements were described as median and interquartile range.
Only patients with the corresponding component present were included in the comparison.
Figure 1The images from a 85-year-old male patient who had carotid atherosclerotic plaque with IPH and calcification in the left side and changed CBF undergoing CEA. An eccentric plaque (white arrow) was delineated in the curved projection reconstructed image of 3D T1W (A). IPH (orange), calcification (navy blue), and LRNC (yellow) were demonstrated on the axial multi-contrast MR images with the manually outlied lumen (red), wall (blue), and component boundaries (B–E). The preoperative (F) and postoperative (G) CBF maps were shown, respectively. The ROIs on images (F,G) were located at the cortical flow territory of the middle cerebral artery on both index and contralateral sides. CBF, cerebral blood flow; CEA, carotid endarterectomy; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage; LRNC, lipid-rich necrotic core; ROIs, region of interests; SNAP, Simultaneous non-contrast angiography intraplaque hemorrhage; T1W, T1-weighted; T2W, T2-weighted. TOF, time-of-flight.
Correlations between clinical information and CBF (n = 61).
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| −0.005 | 0.972 | 0.188 | 0.147 | |
| 0.100 | 0.443 | 0.109 | 0.401 | |
|
| −0.083 | 0.523 | −0.143 | 0.272 |
| SBP, mmHg | 0.035 | 0.789 | −0.065 | 0.619 |
| DBP, mmHg | −0.279 | 0.029 | −0.092 | 0.479 |
|
| −0.032 | 0.808 | −0.051 | 0.694 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 0.059 | 0.650 | 0.016 | 0.906 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 0.140 | 0.282 | −0.137 | 0.292 |
| TC, mmol/L | 0.157 | 0.228 | −0.185 | 0.154 |
| TG, mmol/L | 0.008 | 0.954 | −0.225 | 0.081 |
|
| −0.086 | 0.508 | 0.044 | 0.735 |
| Glu, mmol/L | 0.060 | 0.646 | 0.101 | 0.438 |
|
| 0.162 | 0.212 | 0.081 | 0.535 |
|
| −0.014 | 0.916 | −0.052 | 0.691 |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; Glu, glucose. The categorical variables were described as percentage and continuous variables were described as median and interquartile range.
Univariate linear regression analysis between plaque characteristics and CBF (n = 61).
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Mean lumen area, mm2 | −0.003 | −0.007, 0.001 | 0.194 | −0.001 | −0.005, 0.002 | 0.375 |
| Mean wall area, mm2 | −0.001 | −0.003, 0.001 | 0.278 | −0.001 | −0.003, 0.001 | 0.314 |
| Mean total vessel area, mm2 | −0.001 | −0.003, 0.001 | 0.178 | −0.001 | −0.002, 0.001 | 0.260 |
| Max WT, mm | −0.009 | −0.031, 0.013 | 0.398 | −0.014 | −0.031, 0.003 | 0.099 |
| Mean NWI, % | 0.001 | −0.004, 0.005 | 0.819 | 0.002 | −0.002, 0.006 | 0.300 |
| Stenosis, % | −0.462 | −0.797, −0.126 | 0.008 | 0.057 | −0.221, 0.336 | 0.683 |
|
| ||||||
| LRNC | −0.018 | −0.135, 0.100 | 0.762 | 0.028 | −0.064, 0.119 | 0.549 |
| IPH | −0.016 | −0.099, 0.068 | 0.708 | 0.053 | −0.011, 0.117 | 0.101 |
| Calcification | 0.103 | 0.005, 0.201 | 0.040 | −0.014 | −0.094, 0.065 | 0.722 |
| Ulcer | 0.083 | −0.011, 0.177 | 0.084 | −0.025 | −0.100, 0.051 | 0.515 |
| FCR | 0.020 | −0.063, 0.103 | 0.631 | 0.044 | −0.020, 0.108 | 0.176 |
|
| ||||||
| LRNC, mm3 | −0.029 | −0.077, 0.020 | 0.240 | −0.030 | −0.065, 0.006 | 0.098 |
| IPH, mm3 | −0.045 | −0.114, 0.023 | 0.182 | −0.060 | −0.107, −0.014 | 0.013 |
| Calcification, mm3 | 0.022 | −0.019, 0.063 | 0.286 | −0.004 | −0.033, 0.025 | 0.805 |
| Ulcer, mm3 | 0.041 | −0.011, 0.093 | 0.112 | 0.013 | −0.023, 0.049 | 0.454 |
|
| ||||||
| LRNC, % | −0.029 | −0.091, 0.033 | 0.355 | −0.001 | −0.048, 0.046 | 0.965 |
| IPH, % | −0.127 | −0.223, −0.030 | 0.012 | −0.026 | −0.106, 0.055 | 0.515 |
| Calcification, % | 0.026 | −0.019, 0.070 | 0.251 | 0.012 | −0.019, 0.043 | 0.441 |
| Ulcer, % | 0.069 | 0.025, 0.113 | 0.005 | 0.025 | −0.010, 0.061 | 0.146 |
Only patients with the corresponding component present were included in the comparison.
The increment of these continuous variables was 1 standard deviation. LA, lumen area; WA, wall area; TVA, total vessel area; Max WT, maximum wall thickness; NWI, normalized wall index; LRNC, lipid-rich necrotic core; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage; and FCR, fibrous cap rupture.
Multi-variate linear regression analysis between plaque characteristics and CBF (n = 61).
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Mean lumen area, mm2 | −0.001 | −0.005, 0.003 | 0.548 | −0.002 | −0.005, 0.001 | 0.300 |
| Mean wall area, mm2 | −0.0004 | −0.003, 0.002 | 0.725 | −0.0009 | −0.003, 0.001 | 0.311 |
| Mean total vessel area, mm2 | −0.0004 | −0.002, 0.001 | 0.607 | −0.0008 | −0.002, 0.001 | 0.236 |
| Mas WT, mm | −0.003 | −0.024, 0.018 | 0.797 | −0.011 | −0.028, 0.006 | 0.193 |
| Mean NWI, % | 0.002 | −0.003, 0.007 | 0.373 | 0.002 | −0.003, 0.006 | 0.415 |
|
| ||||||
| LRNC | 0.008 | −0.111, 0.128 | 0.888 | 0.022 | −0.077, 0.121 | 0.659 |
| IPH | −0.022 | −0.109, 0.064 | 0.606 | 0.051 | −0.020, 0.121 | 0.154 |
| Calcification | 0.099 | 0.004, 0.194 | 0.042 | −0.055 | −0.139, 0.030 | 0.200 |
| Ulcer | 0.054 | −0.037, 0.146 | 0.238 | −0.012 | −0.089, 0.065 | 0.749 |
| FCR | 0.016 | −0.065, 0.098 | 0.689 | 0.033 | −0.034, 0.100 | 0.327 |
|
| ||||||
| LRNC, mm3 | −0.026 | −0.070, 0.019 | 0.260 | −0.024 | −0.060, 0.011 | 0.174 |
| IPH, mm3 | −0.038 | −0.099, 0.023 | 0.213 | −0.060 | −0.109, −0.011 | 0.020 |
| Calcification, mm3 | 0.022 | −0.019, 0.062 | 0.285 | −0.007 | −0.037, 0.022 | 0.618 |
| Ulcer, mm3 | 0.026 | −0.031, 0.083 | 0.329 | 0.021 | −0.024, 0.065 | 0.322 |
|
| ||||||
| LRNC, % | −0.017 | −0.076, 0.042 | 0.559 | 0.002 | −0.044, 0.048 | 0.933 |
| IPH, % | −0.089 | −0.188, 0.011 | 0.080 | 0.040 | −0.130, 0.051 | 0.371 |
| Calcification, % | 0.026 | −0.018, 0.071 | 0.233 | 0.011 | −0.021, 0.043 | 0.497 |
| Ulcer, mm3 | 0.050 | −0.012, 0.112 | 0.100 | 0.038 | −0.004, 0.081 | 0.072 |
Adjusted for age, sex, index-stenosis and DBP;
Adjusted for age, sex, index-stenosis and TG;
Only patients with the corresponding component present were included in the comparison.
The increment of these continuous variables was 1 standard deviation. Max WT, maximum wall thickness; NWI, normalized wall index; LRNC, lipid-rich necrotic core; IPH, intraplaque hemorrhage; FCR, fibrous cap rupture.