Literature DB >> 21163919

Plaque hemorrhage is a marker of thromboembolic activity in patients with symptomatic carotid disease.

Nishath Altaf1, Stephen D Goode, Andrew Beech, John R F Gladman, Paul S Morgan, Shane T MacSweeney, Dorothee P Auer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether carotid plaque hemorrhage depicted with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was associated with thromboembolic activity as assessed with transcranial Doppler imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local research ethics committee approved the study, and all patients gave informed written consent. Between April 2005 and December 2006, patients with high-grade symptomatic carotid stenosis were prospectively recruited. All underwent MR imaging of the carotid arteries for plaque hemorrhage and diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain. Transcranial Doppler imaging of the symptomatic carotid artery was performed over 1 hour to assess the presence of microembolic signal. To determine the relationship between the presence of plaque hemorrhage and diffusion-weighted imaging-positive signal and presence of microembolic signal, a logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (23 women and 28 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 72 years ± 11) underwent complete MR imaging; 46 (86%) of these patients underwent complete transcranial Doppler imaging. In 32 (63%) patients, there was plaque hemorrhage in the index carotid artery. The presence of plaque hemorrhage increased the risk for ipsilateral abnormalities at diffusion-weighted imaging (odds ratio, 6.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.7, 21.8]; P < .05). Multiple diffusion-weighted imaging-depicted abnormalities of multiple ages were present exclusively in patients with plaque hemorrhage shown at MR imaging (12 of 32 [38%] patients with plaque hemorrhage versus none of 19 patients without plaque hemorrhage; P < .05). The presence of plaque hemorrhage also increased the presence of microembolic signal (odds ratio, 6.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.8, 19.9]; P = .003).
CONCLUSION: In patients with carotid plaque hemorrhage demonstrated at MR imaging, there was increased spontaneous microembolic activity at transcranial Doppler imaging and cerebral ischemic lesion patterns suggestive of recurrent embolic events; these findings suggest that plaque hemorrhage shown at MR imaging might be a marker of thromboembolic activity and further validate the usefulness of carotid imaging in identifying patients with active carotid arterial disease. © RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21163919     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  Safety of protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and carotid intraplaque hemorrhage.

Authors:  W Yoon; S K Kim; M S Park; H J Chae; H K Kang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage on vessel wall MRI does not correlate with TCD emboli monitoring in patients with recently symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; David Tirschwell; Jennifer J Majersik; Scott McNally; Gregory Stoddard; Anne Moore; Mahmud Mossa-Basha
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-06-20

Review 3.  Does preoperative carotid stenosis screening reduce perioperative stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Khalil Masabni; Sajjad Raza; Eugene H Blackstone; Heather L Gornik; Joseph F Sabik
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery plaque.

Authors:  Majid M Mughal; Mohsin K Khan; J Kevin DeMarco; Arshad Majid; Fadi Shamoun; George S Abela
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-10

5.  High-resolution MRI assessed carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics comparing men and women with elevated ApoB levels.

Authors:  Tianwen Han; Pathmaja Paramsothy; Jaekyoung Hong; Daniel Isquith; Dongxiang Xu; Hua Bai; Moni Neradilek; Edward Gill; Xue-Qiao Zhao
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Associations Between Carotid Plaque Characteristics and Perioperative Cerebral Blood Flow Determined by Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Stenosis Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Ran Huo; Huimin Xu; Guangjin Zhou; Tao Wang; Huishu Yuan; Xihai Zhao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque surface characteristics utilizing simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) technique.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Huilin Zhao; Jifan Li; Zechen Zhou; Rui Li; Niranjan Balu; Chun Yuan; Huijun Chen; Xihai Zhao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Blood Pressure Is a Major Modifiable Risk Factor Implicated in Pathogenesis of Intraplaque Hemorrhage: An In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jie Sun; Gador Canton; Niranjan Balu; Daniel S Hippe; Dongxiang Xu; Jin Liu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 8.311

9.  The relationship between carotid artery plaque stability and white matter ischemic injury.

Authors:  Sara E Berman; Xiao Wang; Carol C Mitchell; Bornali Kundu; Daren C Jackson; Stephanie M Wilbrand; Tomy Varghese; Bruce P Hermann; Howard A Rowley; Sterling C Johnson; Robert J Dempsey
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  MRI plaque imaging detects carotid plaques with a high risk for future cerebrovascular events in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Lorena Esposito-Bauer; Tobias Saam; Iman Ghodrati; Jaroslav Pelisek; Peter Heider; Matthias Bauer; Petra Wolf; Angelina Bockelbrink; Regina Feurer; Dominik Sepp; Claudia Winkler; Peter Zepper; Tobias Boeckh-Behrens; Matthias Riemenschneider; Bernhard Hemmer; Holger Poppert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.