Estefanía Tiburcio1, Yongkun Zheng2, Marta Mon2, Nuria Martín1, Jesús Ferrando Soria1, Donatella Armentano3, Antonio Leyva Pérez2, Emilio Pardo1. 1. Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Instituto de Ciencia Molecular (ICMOL), Universidad de Valencia, Valencia 46980, Spain. 2. Instituto de Tecnología Química (UPV-CSIC), Universidad Politècnica de València-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Avda. de los Naranjos s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain. 3. Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università della Calabria, Rende, Cosenza87036, Italy.
Abstract
The preparation of novel efficient catalysts─that could be applicable in industrially important chemical processes─has attracted great interest. Small subnanometer metal clusters can exhibit outstanding catalytic capabilities, and thus, research efforts have been devoted, recently, to synthesize novel catalysts bearing such active sites. Here, we report the gram-scale preparation of Ag20 subnanometer clusters within the channels of a highly crystalline three-dimensional anionic metal-organic framework, with the formula [Ag20]@AgI2NaI2{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·48H2O [Me3mpba4- = N,N'-2,4,6-trimethyl-1,3-phenylenebis(oxamate)]. The resulting crystalline solid catalyst─fully characterized with the help of single-crystal X-ray diffraction─exhibits high catalytic activity for the catalytic Buchner ring expansion reaction.
The preparation of novel efficient catalysts─that could be applicable in industrially important chemical processes─has attracted great interest. Small subnanometer metal clusters can exhibit outstanding catalytic capabilities, and thus, research efforts have been devoted, recently, to synthesize novel catalysts bearing such active sites. Here, we report the gram-scale preparation of Ag20 subnanometer clusters within the channels of a highly crystalline three-dimensional anionic metal-organic framework, with the formula [Ag20]@AgI2NaI2{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·48H2O [Me3mpba4- = N,N'-2,4,6-trimethyl-1,3-phenylenebis(oxamate)]. The resulting crystalline solid catalyst─fully characterized with the help of single-crystal X-ray diffraction─exhibits high catalytic activity for the catalytic Buchner ring expansion reaction.
The preparation, stabilization, and characterization
of subnanometer
metal clusters (SNMCs) has been a main challenge for chemists during
the last years.[1−7] Indeed, the preparation of such ultrasmall entities is highly complex
and often requires, for instance, the use of stabilizing blocking
ligands[8] that prevent their agglomeration
into larger metal nanoparticles (MNPs) but, in turn, may worsen their
catalytic properties. Moreover, the characterization of such tiny
SNMCs is really not an easy task and requires the use of high-resolution
microscopy techniques—for example, high-angle annular dark-field–scanning
transmission electron microscopy (HAADF–STEM)—whose
electron beam can, with time, degrade the sample that is being observed.[9] However, despite such complications, the outstanding
medical, optical, and/or catalytic properties of SNMCs make it well
worth the effort.[3,4,10,11]Focusing on the catalytic properties
of SNMCs, stabilizing capping
ligands of SNMCs dramatically reduces their catalytic activity as
they prevent a proper contact with reactants and trigger their decomposition
under reaction conditions. Therefore, it seems clear that “naked”
SNMCs, with all metal atoms exposed, are called to offer the best
catalytic performances.[12] In this context,
a proper strategy to obtain ligand-free SNMCs consists in supporting
these metal species in porous solids such as zeolites or organic porous
materials.[13] More recently, another type
of porous materials, the so-called metal–organic frameworks
(MOFs),[14] have emerged as a suitable platform
not only to host SNMCs but also to be used as chemical reactors for
the in situ chemical synthesis of the SNMCs.[15,16]MOFs are crystalline porous materials that have attracted
significant
attention in the past 2 decades due to the myriad applications they
can be used in.[17] Moreover, aiming at encapsulating/synthesizing
SNMCs, or even single-atom catalysts,[18−22] MOFs offer clear advantages compared to other porous
materials such as a fine control of the functionalities decorating
the channels—which allows us to retain and align metals in
specific positions and controlled stoichiometries—and the possibility
to use single-crystal X-ray crystallography[23−25] to unveil the
crystal structure of these ultrasmall metal species.In this
context, we recently used,[21] as a chemical
reactor, a highly robust anionic three-dimensional
MOF, with the formula NiII2{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·54H2O [Me3mpba4– = N,N′-2,4,6-trimethyl-1,3-phenylenebis(oxamate)],
for the MOF-driven preparation of ligand-free tetranuclear [Pd4]2+ clusters after two consecutive post-synthetic
steps consisting of first replacing the Ni2+ cations hosted
within its channels by Pd2+ ones and the concomitant reduction
to form the final tetranuclear species within the empty space of the
MOF. The resulting host–guest material had the following formula:
[Pd4]0.5@Na3{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·56H2O (Figure ). Overall, the anionic nature of the MOF
allowed a fine control of the number of inserted Pd2+ cations
in the first step, which were occupying specific positions by interacting
with the carboxylate oxygens from the network. Then, the confined
space, as well as the mentioned controlled stoichiometry, allowed
the formation of the small [Pd4]2+ clusters,
homogeneously distributed within the walls of the MOF (Figure ). As expected, such naked
clusters, possessing all four metal atoms outwardly exposed, exhibited
outstanding catalytic activity, outperforming state-of-the-art metal
catalysts in carbene-mediated reactions, also showing high yields
(>90%) and turnover numbers (up to 100,000). However, considering
the high cost of palladium, it would be highly desirable to achieve
highly performing SNMCs with lower prices.
Figure 1
Crystal structure of
the previously reported [Pd4]0.5@Na3{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·56H2O MOF.[21] Atoms constituting the
framework and Pd atoms are represented by light yellow and blue spheres,
respectively.
Crystal structure of
the previously reported [Pd4]0.5@Na3{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·56H2O MOF.[21] Atoms constituting the
framework and Pd atoms are represented by light yellow and blue spheres,
respectively.
Results and Discussion
Herein, aiming at expanding
these results to more affordable metals,
we report the two-step post-synthetic preparation of Ag20 nanoclusters using
the same MOF NiII2{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·54H2O (1) as the host matrix
(Figure a). First,
nickel(II) cations, located in the pores of 1, are exchanged
by Ag+ ones, yielding the novel compound AgI4{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·51H2O (2) (Figure b). Then, after introducing NaBH4, the reduction
process occurs to give the final compound [Ag20]@AgI2NaI2{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·48H2O (3) (Figure c). The whole process could
be followed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), unveiling
certain details about the nanocluster formation, which constitutes
one of the very few examples of MOF-hosted silver subnanometer clusters[26] and the first whose crystal structure could
be elucidated.
Figure 2
Design approach showing the crystal structures of 1 (a), 2 (b), and 3 (c) showing
the two-step
post-synthetic process consisting of the exchange of the NiII cations in the pores of 1 by AgI ones to yield 2 and the reduction process to form the Ag20 clusters in 3. Virtual
diameters of larger octagonal pores are 2.0 nm for MOFs 1–3, respectively. Copper and nickel atoms from
the network are represented by cyan and orange polyhedra, respectively,
whereas organic ligands are depicted as gray sticks. Orange, yellow,
and blue spheres represent Ni, Na, and Ag atoms, respectively.
Design approach showing the crystal structures of 1 (a), 2 (b), and 3 (c) showing
the two-step
post-synthetic process consisting of the exchange of the NiII cations in the pores of 1 by AgI ones to yield 2 and the reduction process to form the Ag20 clusters in 3. Virtual
diameters of larger octagonal pores are 2.0 nm for MOFs 1–3, respectively. Copper and nickel atoms from
the network are represented by cyan and orange polyhedra, respectively,
whereas organic ligands are depicted as gray sticks. Orange, yellow,
and blue spheres represent Ni, Na, and Ag atoms, respectively.The nature of the final hybrid material, 3, containing
Ag2 clusters (together with unreduced Ag+ ions)
has been further confirmed by the combination of a variety of techniques
including inductively coupled plasm–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS)
(Table S1, Supporting Information), elemental
mapping, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron
microscopy (SEM). The N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K confirmed
the permanent porosity of 2 and 3 (see below).
Finally, as previously mentioned, SCXRD with synchrotron radiation
allowed the resolution of the crystal structure of 2 and 3 (Table S2, Supporting Information) and the observation of ultrasmall silver dinuclear entities and
surroundings within the solid in 3 (Figures and S1).The anionic NiII4CuII6 open-framework structures in both 2 and 3 are isoreticular and crystallize in the P4/mmm space group of the tetragonal system. Compound 2 exhibits the Ag+ cations situated within the
walls of the hydrophilic octagonal pores (virtual diameter of 2.0
nm), where they are stabilized by noncovalent interactions involving
oxamate oxygen atoms [Ag+···Ooxamate of 2.72(1)–2.79(1) Å], with no evidence of previously
Ni2+ cations of 1, thus indicating that they
are completely exchanged by Ag+ ones (Figure b). Ag+ ion surroundings
unveil interacting oxygen atoms likely belonging to nitrate anions
(the whole fragments were not found from the ΔF map, see Supporting Information, Figures S1–S3)
or solvent water molecules [Ag+···O distance
range of 2.38(3)–2.56(3) Å], together with Ag+···Ag+ with a separation of 2.74(2) Å,
which is shorter than the van der Waals contact distance, and they
might be considered as precursors of the Ag20 dimers observed in 3. On
the other hand, the crystal structure of 3 reveals the
stabilization provided by the nano-confined space of the MOF on the
as-synthesized Ag20 dimers, constricted into the walls of the hydrophilic octagonal
channels of the anionic Ni42+Cu62+ open-framework net (Figures c, S4, and S5), together
with unreduced Ag+···Ag+ dimers
in smaller square pores (Figures c and S5). Further hydrated
charge-counterbalancing alkali Na+ cations are retained
in the preferential cationic sites, which stabilize the final material,
showing an outstanding robustness (Figures S4 and S5). The poorer accessibility to the small square pores
for solvated NaBH4 is most likely the reason for still
unreduced Ag+···Ag+ dimers [blocked
by Ag+···Ooxamate interactions
at a distance of 2.84(1) Å] (Figure S5). Figure shows
that Ag20 dimers
[intradimer Ag···Ag distance of 3.19(1) Å] are
well-fixed and stabilized inside the walls of the largest pores of
the network by means of supramolecular interactions involving oxamate
ligands [Ag···Ooxamate distance range of
2.93(1)–3.05(1) Å] and very weak connections with solvent
molecules [Ag0···Owater distance
of 3.25(1) Å].
Figure 3
One single channel of 3, showing supramolecular
interactions
involving oxamate ligands of the network (distances are reported in
angstroms).
One single channel of 3, showing supramolecular
interactions
involving oxamate ligands of the network (distances are reported in
angstroms).SEM coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDX) measurements
of 2 and 3 are given in Figures S6 and S7. EDX elemental mappings for Cu, Ni, Ag,
and Na (3) elements show a heterogeneous spatial distribution
of Ag atoms always located next to Cu and Ni atoms. Moreover, aberration-corrected
HAADF–STEM (AC-HAADF–STEM) images are shown in Figure S8. They allow a direct visualization
of both Ag2 dimers together with Ag1 species—most
likely to silver atoms residing in smaller square channels.TGA of 2 and 3 (Figure S9) established the solvent contents for both materials, which
are reflected in their chemical formulas. PXRD patterns of 2 and 3 (Figure S10) indicate
that the bulk samples are crystalline and pure, with no typical peaks
of Ag0 nanoparticles. Indeed, experimental diffraction
patterns of 2 and 3 are identical to the
theoretical ones extracted from the SCXRD data. XPS spectra of compounds 2 and 3 are depicted in Figure S11. For 2, only possessing Ag+ cations,
two bands at 367.6 and 373.6 eV, ascribed to Ag 3d5/2 and
Ag 3d3/2 binding energies, respectively,[27] are observed (Figure S11a).
In turn, for MOF 3—where SCXRD and elemental analyses
suggest that Ag+ cations and Ag20 nanoclusters coexist—apart from
the same Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 bands at 367.6
and 373.6 eV, respectively, indicative of Ag+, two additional
peaks at 368.4 and 374.4 eV can be observed, which are attributed
to reduced Ag0 atoms, with a 1:1 ratio respect to Ag+ (Figure S11b). CO-probe diffuse
reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) was conducted
on MOF 3, run at 77 K to avoid any in situ reduction
of Ag+ and to observe potential Ag0–CO
species (Figure S12). The results show
three main peaks, one at 1938 cm–1, consistent with
CO bridged-bonded to Ag0 atoms,[28] a second at 2059 cm–1, attributable to Ag(CO)+ species,[29] and a last peak at
2043 cm–1, corresponding to free CO, after saturation.
It is known that the adsorption of CO on Ag0 is lower than
Ag+;[30] thus, the lower intensity
of the former makes sense and could very well correspond to a 1:1
ratio between Ag oxidation states. These results strongly support
that 50% of Ag+ present in 2 are reduced by
NaBH4 forming Ag20 nanoclusters, whereas 50% of Ag+ cations remain untouched, occupying inaccessible sheltered interstitial
positions where the reducing agent cannot accede (see the structural
description). The N2 and CO2 adsorption isotherms
for 1–3 confirm their permanent porosity
(Figures S13 and S14). N2 adsorption
isotherms for 1–3, with calculated
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller[31] surface
areas of 974, 1013, and 625 m2/g, respectively, indicate
a very similar permanent porosity for 1 and 3, which is in agreement with their identical estimated virtual diameters
of 2.0 nm. In turn, MOF 2 exhibits lower N2 adsorption despite having the same virtual diameter (2.0 nm), which
could be due to a partial collapse of the structure upon solvent evacuation
treatment. Remarkably, CO2 adsorption isotherms show a
66% uptake increase for 3, suggesting quadrupole interactions
between CO2 molecules and Na+ cations.The Buchner ring expansion reaction was attempted with catalytic
amounts of 3. The results show that the reaction between
toluene (4) and ethyl diazoacetate (5) (EDA)
proceeds rapidly (30 min) in a very high yield, under standard reaction
conditions (Figure top).[21,32] Blank experiments without any catalyst gave
a 8% conversion, and the use of MOFs 1 and 2 as catalysts showed the lower catalytic activity of these MOFs than
that of 3, with a 3 times lower initial rate for the
former (Figure S15). Commercial Ag NPs
on alumina only gave a 16% conversion, and remarkably, the state-of-the
art catalyst for this reaction, that is, Rh2(OAc)4, gave a lower result than MOF 3 in this study, under
identical reaction conditions (63% after the addition of 5 at once). An optimum >95% yield of product 6 was
obtained
after maintaining a low concentration of 5 during the
reaction, which was achieved by adding a solution of 5 (in dichloromethane) into the reaction mixture using a syringe pump,
instead of adding it at once. Otherwise, the unwanted dimerization
reaction of 5 occurs. It is worth noting here that product 6 corresponds to the typical mixture of cycloheptatriene isomers,
in accordance with previous results.[21,32] A hot filtration
test, where the solid MOF catalyst 3 is removed from
the reaction mixture at the reaction temperature (60 °C) at an
early conversion (∼30%), shows that the catalytic active species
are not present in solution within the experimental error (<10%, Figure bottom), which supports
the relative stability of the solid catalyst. In accordance with this
result, MOF 3 can be recovered at the end of the reaction
by centrifugation, washed, and reused six times, maintaining a good
catalytic activity (Figure S16). However,
the catalytic yield of MOF 3 decreased to 30% after six
uses, which could be due to the progressive (although minor) leaching
of active species during the reaction.
Figure 4
Top: results for the
Buchner ring expansion reaction between toluene 4 and
ethyl diazoacetate 5 catalyzed by MOF 3.
Bottom: Hot filtration test after adding 5 at once, error
bars account for 5% uncertainty. (a) GC yield after
syringe pump addition of 5, with the result after the addition of 5 at once given in parentheses; the result with Rh2(OAc)4 as a catalyst (5 mol %) is 63%.
Top: results for the
Buchner ring expansion reaction between toluene 4 and
ethyl diazoacetate 5 catalyzed by MOF 3.
Bottom: Hot filtration test after adding 5 at once, error
bars account for 5% uncertainty. (a) GC yield after
syringe pump addition of 5, with the result after the addition of 5 at once given in parentheses; the result with Rh2(OAc)4 as a catalyst (5 mol %) is 63%.The Buchner ring expansion reaction catalyzed by 3 could be expanded to other aromatic substrates (Table ). Halogenated (products 13, 14, and 17), cyano (product 15), methoxy (product 16), and ortho-disubstituted
(product 18) aromatic compounds react with 5 in good to excellent yields and still in short reaction times (<2
h). These results should be remarked upon as this is difficult to
find in the open literature Ag-catalyzed Buchner ring expansion reactions.[32−35] The slightly lower results obtained for the bigger substrates 11 and 12 can be explained by the size discrimination
associated to the microporous structure of MOF 3. To
check this, 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene 19 was tested as
a substrate for the reaction, and product 20 was not
found (Figure S17). Besides, diffusion
tests with varying stirring speeds confirmed that the initial reaction
rate is dependent on the stirring, which confirms that the reaction
occurs inside the MOF’s channels (Figure S18). Indeed, 1,3,5-triisopropylbenzene 19 reacted
when the Rh2(OAc)4 salt was used as a catalyst
(3 mol %, 69% yield, Figure S17). Therefore,
for MOF- or zeolite-stabilized Pd clusters,[21,36] the formation of Ag2 clusters in micro-structured solids
enables not only the catalytic use of this metal in this complex organic
synthetic reaction but also its recovery and reuse.[36,37] Interstitial Ag+ cations must be excluded as catalytically
active species since reagents cannot access these sites; besides,
leaching does not occur under the reaction conditions employed. Finally,
the integrity of MOF 3 is ensured by PXRD (Figure S19) and XPS (Figure S20) after catalytic experiments.
Table 1
Results for the Buchner Ring Expansion
Reaction between Different Aromatics 7–12 and 5, Catalyzed
by MOF 3a
entry
aryl substrate
substituent(s)
product
yield (%)a
1
7
Cl
13
66.5
2
8
Br
14
64.9
3
9
CN
15
92.8
4
10
OMe
16
82.6
5
11
CH2Br
17
50.2
6
12
Me-ortho-F
18
72.7
GC yields after syringe pump addition
of 5.
GC yields after syringe pump addition
of 5.
Conclusions
In conclusion, ligand-free Ag20 clusters have
been prepared, stabilized and
characterized within an MOF and used as efficient and recoverable
catalysts for the Buchner ring expansion reaction. These results expand
the toolkit of readily affordable Ag species for heterogeneous catalysis
in organic synthesis.
Experimental Section
Preparation of AgI4{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·51H2O (2)
Well-formed
deep green prisms of 2, which were suitable for XRD,
were obtained by immersing crystals of 1 (ca. 0.0015
mmol) for 48 h in 5 mL of a AgNO3 aqueous solution (0.004
mmol), which was replaced three times. A multigram scale procedure
was also carried out by using the same synthetic procedure but with
greater amounts of both, a powder sample of compound 1 (ca. 20 g, 5.8 mmol) and AgNO3 (2.38
g, 14.0 mmol), with the same successful results and a very high yield
(20.33 g, 96%). Anal.: calcd (%) for Cu6Ni4Ag4C78H162N12O87 (3707.7):
C, 25.27; H, 4.40; N, 4.53. Found: C, 25.34; H, 4.37; N, 4.59. IR
(KBr): ν = 3008, 2961 and 2926 cm–1 (C–H),
1601 cm–1 (C=O).
Preparation of [Ag2]AgI2NaI2{NiII4[CuII2(Me3mpba)2]3}·48H2O (3)
Both crystals (ca. 5 mg) and a
powder polycrystalline sample of 2 (ca. 10 g) were suspended
in 50 mL of a H2O/CH3OH (1:2) solution, to which
an excess of NaBH4, divided in 26 fractions (each fraction
consisting of 1 mol of NaBH4 per mole of 2 to give a final NaBH4/MOF molar ratio of 26 or a NaBH4/Ag atom molar ratio of 13, which is the same), was added
progressively in the space of 72 h. After each addition, the mixture
was allowed to react for 1.5 h. After this period, samples were gently
washed with a H2O/CH3OH solution and filtered
on paper, giving high yields (ca. 98%). Anal. Calcd
(%) for Cu6Ni4Ag4Na2C78H156N12O84 (3699.61): C,
25.32; H, 4.25; N, 4.54. Found: C, 25.28; H, 4.17; N, 4.59. IR (KBr):
ν = 3011, 2971 and 2928 cm–1 (C–H),
1605 cm–1 (C=O).
Gas Adsorption
The N2 and CO2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 and 273 K were obtained
on polycrystalline samples of 2 and 3 using
a BELSORP-mini-X instrument. Samples were first activated with methanol
and then evacuated at 348 K during 19 h under 10–6 Torr prior to their analysis.
Microscopy Measurements
SEM elemental analysis was
carried out for 2 and 3 using a HITACHI
S-4800 electron microscope coupled with an EDX detector. Data were
analyzed using QUANTAX 400.HAADF–STEM characterization
for 3 was performed using an HAADF-FEI-TITAN G2 electron
microscope. 5 mg of the material was re-dispersed in 1 mL of absolute
EtOH. Carbon-reinforced copper grids (200 mesh) were submerged into
the suspension 30 times and then allowed to dry on air for 24 h.
PXRD Measurements
Polycrystalline samples of 2 and 3 were introduced into 0.5 mm borosilicate
capillaries prior to being mounted and aligned on an Empyrean PANalytical
powder diffractometer, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056
Å). For each sample, five repeated measurements were collected
at room temperature (2θ = 2–60°) and merged in a
single diffractogram.
XPS Measurements
Samples of 2 and 3 were prepared by sticking, without sieving, the samples
onto a molybdenum plate using a scotch tape film, followed by air-drying.
Measurements were performed on a K-Alpha XPS system using a monochromatic
Al K(alpha) source (1486.6 eV). As an internal reference for the peak
positions in the XPS spectra, the C 1s peak has been set at 284.8
eV.
DRIFTS of Adsorbed CO
DRIFTS using CO as a probe molecule
was used to evaluate the electronic properties of MOF 3. The experiments have been carried out in a homemade IR cell able
to work in the high and low (77 K) temperature ranges. Prior to CO
adsorption experiments, the sample was evacuated at 298 K under vacuum
(10–6 mbar) for 1 h. CO adsorption experiments were
performed at 77 K in the 0.2–20 mbar range. Spectra were recorded
once complete coverage of CO at the specified CO partial pressure
was achieved. Deconvolution of the IR spectra has been performed in
the Origin software using Gaussian curves where the full width at
half-maximum of the individual bands has been taken as a constant.
The peak areas are normalized to the sample weight.
X-ray Crystallographic Data Collection and Structural Refinement
Crystals of 2 and 3 with ca. 0.06 ×
0.08 × 0.08 and 0.08 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm dimensions, respectively,
were selected and mounted on a MITIGEN holder in Paratone oil and
very quickly placed on a liquid nitrogen stream cooled at 90 K to
avoid the possible degradation upon dehydration. Diffraction data
for 2–3 were collected using synchrotron
at the I19 beamline of the DIAMOND at λ = 0.6889 Å. Crystallographic
details can be found in the Supporting Information
General Catalytic Reaction Procedure
MOF 3 (9.5 mg, 10 mol % Ag) was weighed in a 2 mL vial with a magnetic
stirrer, and the aromatic substrate (0.8 mL) was added. Then, the
vial was placed in a pre-heated oil batch at 60 °C, and ethyl
diazoacetate 5 (0.1 mmol) was added, either at once or
using a syringe pump (solution in dichloromethane). The mixture was
allowed to react for 0.5–2 h. After the reaction was complete,
filtration was carried out to separate the solid catalyst. The reaction
mixture was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and GC–MS.
Further details can be found in the Supporting Information.
Authors: Ralph Freund; Orysia Zaremba; Giel Arnauts; Rob Ameloot; Grigorii Skorupskii; Mircea Dincă; Anastasiya Bavykina; Jorge Gascon; Aleksander Ejsmont; Joanna Gościańska; Markus Kalmutzki; Ulrich Lächelt; Evelyn Ploetz; Christian Diercks; Stefan Wuttke Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alexandre Burgun; Campbell J Coghlan; David M Huang; Wenqian Chen; Satoshi Horike; Susumu Kitagawa; Jason F Alvino; Gregory F Metha; Christopher J Sumby; Christian J Doonan Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 15.336