| Literature DB >> 35859044 |
Dong Heun Park1, Sang Sun Han2, Munsoo Han1, Seongbin Park1, Hae Nim Kim1, Jiyeon Kim3, Hojun Aan2, Jimoon Kim2, Sungkean Kim2, Kibum Kim4, June Choi5.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) has recently been used as a clinical treatment because it can efficiently simulate situations that are difficult to control in real-world settings. In our study, we assessed the potential of VR in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus. An evaluation of its clinical benefits was performed based on analyses of patient electroencephalograms (EEGs) and by questionnaire responses after 6-8 weeks of patient involvement in our VR-based alleviation program. Clinical trials were performed at a tertiary academic hospital. Nineteen patients (aged 33-64 years) who visited our hospital with chronic subjective tinnitus over 3 months were enrolled in the study. The intervention consisted of trashing the tinnitus avatar in VR. We expected that the patients would have the subjective feeling of controlling tinnitus through our intervention. The VR environment comprised four different sessions in four different settings: a bedroom, a living room, a restaurant, and a city street. We analyzed changes in the source activities of the prefrontal regions related to tinnitus in these patients using standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the total score (from 50.11 to 44.21, P = 0.046) and the grade (from 3.16 to 2.79, P = 0.035) were significantly improved after the VR-based tinnitus treatment program (P < 0.05). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index also showed improved outcomes (P = 0.025). On the other hand, a Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Quality of Life Assessment (WHO-QOL), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Profile of Mood States revealed no significant change after the intervention. The baseline EEG data showed that brain activity in the orbitofrontal cortex significantly increased in the alpha and theta frequency bands. Furthermore, patients who showed a THI score improvement after the intervention showed specific increases in brain activity for the theta and high beta bands in the orbitofrontal cortex. Our findings suggest that the virtual reality-based program, as in parts of cognitive behavioral treatment, may help to alleviate tinnitus-related distress in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35859044 PMCID: PMC9300604 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16764-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Tinnitus treatment experiment setup. (A) The patient and the clinician view the virtual environment through a head-mounted display (HMD) and on a screen, respectively. The patient hears spatial sound from the tinnitus avatar through the HMD headphone. The patient also moves the tinnitus avatar using a VIVE controller. (B) Hardware and software setups.
Figure 2Example of virtual environment for the treatment session. The sparkling object emitting particles (red circle) is a tinnitus avatar. The yellow area is the tinnitus disposal site in which the patients are instructed to discard the tinnitus avatar.
Figure 3The four stages of the experimental protocol.
Figure 4Examples of virtual reality tinnitus treatment scenes. Starting from left to right, the scenes were arranged based on increasing environmental noise. The participants experienced the scenes in order from left to right.
Selected ROIs and BAs.
| ROI (Regions of Interest) | BA (Brodmann Areas) |
|---|---|
| Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex | 24L |
| 24R | |
| Pregenual anterior cingulate | 32L |
| 32R | |
| Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex | 25L |
| 25R | |
| Orbitofrontal cortex | 10L&11L |
| 10R&11R | |
| Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex | 9L&46L |
| 9R&46R |
Patients demographics and clinical features.
| Patients (n = 19) | Age (y) | Gender | Tinnitus laterality (Left/Right/Both ears) | Tinnitus duration (y) | Type of Tinnitus | Associated symptoms | Tinnitus Pitch Matching (Hz) | Tinnitus Loudness (SL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 55 | F | Both | 8 | Buzzing | Hearing loss | 500 | 10 |
| Patient 2 | 62 | M | Left | 0.3 | Ringing | None | 4000 | 5 |
| Patient 3 | 63 | F | Right | 5 | Ringing | Hearing loss | 2000 | 30 |
| Patient 4 | 51 | M | Left | 15 | Ocean waves | Hearing loss | 4000 | 0 |
| Patient 5 | 52 | M | Left | 2 | Ringing | Hearing loss, Dizziness, Ear fullness | 6000 | 5 |
| Patient 6 | 49 | F | Right | 1 | whooshing | Hearing loss | 250 | − 5 |
| Patient 7 | 64 | M | Both | 10 | Crickets | Hearing loss | 1000 | 0 |
| Patient 8 | 62 | F | Left | 13 | static | Hearing loss, Dizziness | 8000 | 10 |
| Patient 9 | 58 | F | Both | 3 | Crickets | Hearing loss | 6000 | 0 |
| Patient 10 | 58 | F | Both | 10 | whooshing | None | 8000 | 5 |
| Patient 11 | 43 | F | Both | 1 | Buzzing | Hearing loss, Dizziness | 4000 | 0 |
| Patient 12 | 63 | M | Both | 5 | Crickets | Hearing loss | 8000 | − 5 |
| Patient 13 | 64 | F | Left | 13 | Ocean waves | None | 2000 | − 10 |
| Patient 14 | 58 | M | Left | 0.25 | Ocean waves | Hearing loss | 8000 | − 5 |
| Patient 15 | 53 | F | Both | 10 | Ringing | Dizziness | 8000 | 5 |
| Patient 16 | 57 | F | Both | 7 | Electrical | Hearing loss, Dizziness | 8000 | 5 |
| Patient 17 | 62 | M | Left | 30 | Buzzing | Hearing loss, Dizziness, Ear fullness | 4000 | 5 |
| Patient 18 | 64 | M | Left | 1 | Ringing | None | 8000 | 0 |
| Patient 19 | 33 | M | Right | 5 | Dial tones | Hearing loss | 4000 | 20 |
| Mean ± SD | 56.4 ± 8.19 | 7.34 ± 7.23 | 5.42 ± 9.22 |
Results of the questionnaires administered to the study participants.
| Before VR | After VR | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional scale | 22.00 | 17.00 | − 5.00 | 0.005 |
| Emotional scale | 19.00 | 16.70 | − 2.30 | 0.108 |
| Catastrophic scale | 10.00 | 10.00 | 0 | 0.968 |
| Total | 50.11 | 44.21 | − 5.90 | 0.046 |
| Grade | 3.16 | 2.79 | − 0.37 | 0.035 |
| 8.47 | 7.37 | − 1.10 | 0.025 | |
| Somatic score | 49.40 | 44.45 | − 4.95 | 0.198 |
| Emotional score | 41.00 | 38.00 | − 3.00 | 0.257 |
| Social score | 60.00 | 60.00 | 0 | 0.727 |
| Total | 48.50 | 45.30 | − 3.20 | 0.165 |
| 72.63 | 73.84 | + 1.21 | 0.434 | |
| Depression | 7.58 | 7.74 | + 0.16 | 0.916 |
| Anxiety | 7.89 | 7.79 | − 0.10 | 0.354 |
| 81.32 | 77.79 | + 3.53 | 0.778 | |
THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; THQ: Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire; WHO-QoL: World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; POMS: Profile of Mood States.
Figure 5Changes in THI total score. 12 of 19 Patients showed improvement in THI total score (THI, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory).
Analysis of nausea, oculomotor, disorientation, and total score derived from the SSQ.
| SSQ (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea (sd) | Oculomotor(sd) | Disorientation(sd) | Total Score(sd) |
| 48.20 (33.97) | 58.25 (36.81) | 74.73 (60.63) | 32.81 (24.03) |
sd: standard deviation.
Figure 6Source-localized cortical power differences in the prefrontal cortex. Increased power levels in the alpha and theta frequency bands (A) and theta and beta 2 frequency bands (B) after virtual reality (VR) tinnitus treatment.