Literature DB >> 35858056

Reality and illusion: the assessment of angular separation of multi-modal signallers in a duetting bird.

Paweł Ręk1,2, Robert D Magrath2.   

Abstract

The spatial distribution of cooperating individuals plays a strategic role in territorial interactions of many group-living animals, and can indicate group cohesion. Vocalizations are commonly used to judge the distribution of signallers, but the spatial resolution of sounds is poor. Many species therefore accompany calls with movement; however, little is known about the role of audio-visual perception in natural interactions. We studied the effect of angular separation on the efficacy of multimodal duets in the Australian magpie-lark, Grallina cyanoleuca. We tested specifically whether conspicuous wing movements, which typically accompany duets, affect responses to auditory angular separation. Multimodal playbacks of duets using robotic models and speakers showed that birds relied primarily on acoustic cues when visual and auditory angular separations were congruent, but used both modalities to judge separation between the signallers when modalities were spatially incongruent. The visual component modified the effect of acoustic separation: robotic models that were apart weakened the response when speakers were together, while models that were together strengthened responses when speakers were apart. Our results show that responses are stronger when signallers are together, and suggest that males were are able to bind information cross-modally on the senders' spatial location, which is consistent with a multisensory illusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angular separation; duet; magpie-lark; multimodal signal; multisensory illusion; robotic birds

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35858056      PMCID: PMC9277264          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  24 in total

1.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Cross-modal integration in a dart-poison frog.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Daniela S Grabul; Kiran K Soma; Philippe Gaucher; Walter Hödl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sound localization with a preceding distractor.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Intersensory binding across space and time: a tutorial review.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Behavioral Indices of Multisensory Integration: Orientation to Visual Cues is Affected by Auditory Stimuli.

Authors:  B E Stein; M A Meredith; W S Huneycutt; L McDade
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Cross-modal integration of multimodal courtship signals in a wolf spider.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Kozak; George W Uetz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Dynamic visual capture: apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target.

Authors:  S Mateeff; J Hohnsbein; T Noack
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Combined auditory and visual stimuli facilitate head saccades in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Whitchurch; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The function of duetting in magpie-larks: conflict, cooperation, or commitment?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Duetting in space: a radio-telemetry study of the black-bellied wren.

Authors:  David M Logue
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.