Literature DB >> 23709064

Intersensory binding across space and time: a tutorial review.

Lihan Chen1, Jean Vroomen.   

Abstract

Spatial ventriloquism refers to the phenomenon that a visual stimulus such as a flash can attract the perceived location of a spatially discordant but temporally synchronous sound. An analogous example of mutual attraction between audition and vision has been found in the temporal domain, where temporal aspects of a visual event, such as its onset, frequency, or duration, can be biased by a slightly asynchronous sound. In this review, we examine various manifestations of spatial and temporal attraction between the senses (both direct effects and aftereffects), and we discuss important constraints on the occurrence of these effects. Factors that potentially modulate ventriloquism-such as attention, synesthetic correspondence, and other cognitive factors-are described. We trace theories and models of spatial and temporal ventriloquism, from the traditional unity assumption and modality appropriateness hypothesis to more recent Bayesian and neural network approaches. Finally, we summarize recent evidence probing the underlying neural mechanisms of spatial and temporal ventriloquism.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23709064     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0475-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  59 in total

1.  Auditory modulation of spiking activity and local field potentials in area MT does not appear to underlie an audiovisual temporal illusion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatial receptive field shift by preceding cross-modal stimulation in the cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  Jinghong Xu; Tingting Bi; Jing Wu; Fanzhu Meng; Kun Wang; Jiawei Hu; Xiao Han; Jiping Zhang; Xiaoming Zhou; Les Keniston; Liping Yu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Blair C Armstrong; Noam Siegelman; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-28

6.  Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Karen T Navarro; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-06

7.  Accumulation and decay of visual capture and the ventriloquism aftereffect caused by brief audio-visual disparities.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Metrical congruency and kinematic familiarity facilitate temporal binding between musical and dance rhythms.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

9.  Slowing the body slows down time perception.

Authors:  Rose De Kock; Weiwei Zhou; Wilsaan M Joiner; Martin Wiener
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Microsaccadic Eye Movements but not Pupillary Dilation Response Characterizes the Crossmodal Freezing Effect.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Hsin-I Liao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.