| Literature DB >> 35852046 |
Karl Olsson1, Arthur J Cheng2,3, Mamdoh Al-Ameri4, Nicolas Tardif5,6, Michael Melin1, Olav Rooyackers5,6, Johanna T Lanner2, Håkan Westerblad2, Thomas Gustafsson7, Joseph D Bruton2, Eric Rullman7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Activation of sphingomyelinase (SMase) as a result of a general inflammatory response has been implicated as a mechanism underlying disease-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function in several clinical conditions including heart failure. Here, for the first time, we characterize the effects of SMase activity on human muscle fibre contractile function and assess skeletal muscle SMase activity in heart failure patients.Entities:
Keywords: Ca2+ sensitivity RNAseq; Heart failure; Skeletal muscle; Sphingomyelinas
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35852046 PMCID: PMC9530516 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ISSN: 2190-5991 Impact factor: 12.063
Characteristics of patients and controls included in the study.
| Parameter | Heart failure ( | Control ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 69 ± 0.8 | 71 ± 2.2 | 0.55 |
| Male/female | 48/13 | 1/9 | |
| Coronary artery disease | 34/61 | 0/10 | |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy | 10/61 | 0/10 | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 35/61 | 0/10 | |
| Hypertension | 33/61 | 4/10 | |
| Diabetes | 28/61 | 1/10 | |
| LVEF (%) | 25 ± 1.0 | 60 ± 1.2 | <0.05 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 64.5 ± 1.7 | 43.9 ± 2.0 | <0.05 |
| NT‐proBNP (ng/L) | 3907 ± 589 | 120 ± 28 | <0.05 |
| Peak VO2 (mL/kg/min) | 14.4 ± 0.6 | 25.8 ± 1.1 | <0.05 |
| RQ value | 1.07 ± 0.01 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 0.13 |
| ACE inhibitor/ARB | 58/61 | 4/10 | |
| Aldosterone antagonist | 37/61 | 0/10 | |
| Loop diuretic | 58/61 | 0/10 | |
| CRT | 25/61 | 0/10 |
Figure 1SMase depresses force and tetanic [Ca2+]i i in single intact fibres. (A) Representative [Ca2+]i and force records during 20 Hz contractions in a single intact human intercostal muscle fibre exposed to SMase for up to 20 min. (B) Mean data of [Ca2+]i and force as a percentage of control in single mouse toe muscle fibres exposed to SMase. Data are means ± SEM. Significant effects (P < 0.05): a = interaction; b = time; c = treatment, 40 or 100 Hz control versus 40 or 100 Hz SMase, respectively, with two‐way RM ANOVA.
Figure 2SMase‐induced force depression is due to the combined effect of a reduction in SR Ca2+ release and myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity. (A,B) Representative [Ca2+]i and force records in a single intact human intercostal and mouse toe muscle fibre, respectively, before and after exposure to SMase. (C,D) In human intercostal (n = 3) and mouse toe muscle (n = 8) fibres, SMase caused a shift of the mean force‐[Ca2+]i values to the right of the control force‐[Ca2+]i curve (i.e. an apparent decrease in myofibrillar Ca2+ sensitivity), and a shift downward to the left compared with frequency‐matched control force‐[Ca2+]i values (i.e. an apparent decrease in tetanic force and [Ca2+]i). (D) Increased SR Ca2+ release following application of caffeine fully offsets the SMase‐induced force depression in mouse toe muscle fibres. The hill plot in (D) was generated from the P max, N and Ca50 mean values of all mouse toe muscle fibres analysed (n = 8).
Figure 3SMase activity induces the transcription of factors promoting protein degradation while transcription of ribosomal proteins is supressed. Volcano‐plot showing SMase‐induced changes in gene expression in isolated human muscle fibres with 471 differentially expressed genes (180 up‐regulated and 291 down‐regulated FDR <1%). Several genes of importance for muscle fibre structural integrity such as the transcription factor SP1 and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B, but also transcripts involved in calcium handling such as ATP2A2 were down‐regulated. Up‐regulated genes included transcripts associated with denervation (FRAT2, RRAD) and fibre‐type switching (TNNC2). (C) On the pathway level, the most notable up‐regulated pathway was proteasome degradation (P = 0.008) whereas cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins was down‐regulated (P < 0.0001). Transcripts belonging to these pathways are highlighted in red and blue on the volcano. The barcode plots illustrate the changes in expression of the members of these two pathways where most of all transcripts involved in ‘proteasome degradation’ and ‘cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins’ were up‐and down‐regulated respectively following SMase treatment.
Figure 4Skeletal muscle SMase activity is elevated in human heart failure patients and the activity of SMase increases with disease duration. (A,B) Skeletal muscle nSMase and aSMase activity, respectively, in human heart failure patients (n = 61) and healthy age‐matched controls (n = 10). (C,D) Skeletal muscle nSMase and aSMase activity, respectively, in human heart failure patients at the time of the 1st biopsy (time of inclusion in the study) and at the 2nd biopsy (follow‐up). Mean follow‐up time 2.5 (±0.2) years, n = 16. Bars indicate mean value and circles represent individual data points. *P < 0.05, age‐matched control subjects versus heart failure patients with unpaired t‐test; 1st versus 2nd biopsy with paired t‐test.
Figure 5Skeletal muscle SMase activity correlates to circulatory markers of inflammation and muscle atrophy. Correlation of skeletal muscle nSMase activity and serum protein quantities of factors analysed with targeted proteomics in human heart failure patients (n = 61). The figure depicts correlation coefficients of plasma proteins significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with skeletal muscle SMase activity. Several factors associated with systemic inflammation including TNF receptor 1 and 2 (TNF‐R1 and TNF‐R2) were significantly associated with skeletal muscle SMase activity in patients with heart failure.