| Literature DB >> 35851765 |
Yilun Wang1, Yuqing Zhang2,3, Nancy E Lane4, Jing Wu5, Tuo Yang6, Jiatian Li1, Hongyi He1, Jie Wei5,6, Chao Zeng1,5,7, Guanghua Lei1,5,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have examined gut microbiota and sarcopenia using 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing; however, this technique may not be able to identify altered specific species and functional capacities of the microbes. We performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare the gut microbiome composition and function between individuals with and without sarcopenia.Entities:
Keywords: Gut microbiome; Metagenomics; Population-based study; Sarcopenia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35851765 PMCID: PMC9530518 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ISSN: 2190-5991 Impact factor: 12.063
Figure 1Selection process of the included subjects in the study.
Basic characteristics of the included participants
| Sarcopenia | Non‐sarcopenia |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 141 | 1276 | ‐ |
| Age, mean (SD), years | 72.2 (8.5) | 62.3 (8.5) | <0.001 |
| 50–59 years (%) | 9.2 | 41.6 | |
| 60–69 years (%) | 28.4 | 36.5 | |
| ≥70 years (%) | 62.4 | 21.9 | |
| Sex (%) | 0.007 | ||
| Male | 51.8 | 39.9 | |
| Female | 48.2 | 60.1 | |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 21.4 (2.5) | 24.2 (3.4) | <0.001 |
| Smoking status (%) | 0.002 | ||
| None | 51.8 | 64.9 | |
| Past | 11.0 | 5.3 | |
| Current | 37.2 | 29.8 | |
| Alcohol intake (%) | 0.014 | ||
| None | 50.4 | 48.2 | |
| Past | 18.2 | 10.9 | |
| Current | 31.4 | 40.9 | |
| Fracture history (%) | 17.0 | 12.9 | 0.166 |
| Physical activity level (%) | 0.608 | ||
| Low and moderate | 16.3 | 14.7 | |
| High | 83.7 | 85.3 | |
| Dietary intake of meat/eggs, mean (SD), times/week | 3.1 (4.0) | 3.3 (3.4) | 0.101 |
| Dietary intake of dairy products, mean (SD), times/week | 0.4 (1.5) | 0.2 (0.9) | 0.008 |
| Dietary intake of vegetables, mean (SD), times/week | 10.3 (5.9) | 10.8 (6.6) | 0.659 |
N, number; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2Comparison of gut microbial diversity and composition of participants with and without sarcopenia. Box plot comparing the participants with and without sarcopenia of α‐diversity measured by the Shannon index at the genetic level (A). The horizontal bar within each box represents the median. The bottom and top of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Line plot comparing participants with and without sarcopenia of α‐diversity indicated by the Shannon index at the taxonomic levels from phylum to species (B). Each plot represents the mean of the Shannon index. PCoA plot comparing participants with and without sarcopenia of β‐diversity measured by the Bray‐Curtis distance at the genetic level (C). Line plot comparing participants with and without sarcopenia of β‐diversity indicated by the Bray–Curtis distance at the taxonomic levels from phylum to species (D). Each plot represents the mean of the Shannon index. PCoA, principal coordinates analysis; PERMANOVA, permutation multivariate analysis of variance.
Figure 3Microbiota genus and species alterations in sarcopenia. Relative abundance of the differential gut microbiota between participants with and without sarcopenia at the genus (A) and species (B) levels. The horizontal bar within each box represents the median. The bottom and top of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Linear associations between the relative abundance of bacterial species and sarcopenia severity (C). The trend line is fitted using a linear model.
Figure 4Random forest model based on differentially abundant species classifying participants with sarcopenia and controls. Receiver‐operating characteristic curve of the test set. The diagonal line in the graph represents an AUC of 0.5 (A). Species are ranked in descending order of importance to the model's accuracy based on mean decrease accuracy (B) and Gini index (C). AUC, area under receiver‐operating characteristic curve.
Figure 5Functional characterization alterations of gut microbiota in sarcopenia. Difference in the relative abundances of predicted functions based on KEGG pathways and modules between individuals with and without sarcopenia (A). The vertical bar within each box represents the median. The bottom and top of each box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The association between bacterial species and KEGG pathways and modules (B). Red indicates a positive association; blue indicates a negative association. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes.