Literature DB >> 35849156

Clinical and echocardiographic risk factors for device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure: an analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry.

Vivian Vij1, Kerstin Piayda2, Dominik Nelles1, Steffen Gloekler3, Roberto Galea3, Monika Fürholz3, Bernhard Meier3, Marco Valgimigli3,4, Gilles O'Hara5, Dabit Arzamendi6, Victor Agudelo6, Lluis Asmarats5,6, Xavier Freixa7, Eduardo Flores-Umanzor7, Ole De Backer8, Lars Sondergaard8, Luis Nombela-Franco9, Angela McInerney9, Kasper Korsholm10, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk10, Shazia Afzal11, Tobias Zeus11, Felix Operhalski12, Boris Schmidt12, Gilles Montalescot13, Paul Guedeney13, Xavier Iriart14, Noelie Miton14, Jacqueline Saw15, Thomas Gilhofer16, Laurent Fauchier17, Egzon Veliqi18, Felix Meincke18, Nils Petri19, Peter Nordbeck19, Dmitrii Ognerubov20, Evgeny Merkulov20, Ignacio Cruz-González21, Rocio Gonzalez-Ferreiro21, Deepak L Bhatt22, Alessandra Laricchia23,24, Antonio Mangieri23,24, Heyder Omran25, Jan Wilko Schrickel1, Josep Rodes-Cabau5, Horst Sievert2, Georg Nickenig1, Alexander Sedaghat26.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on Device-related Thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for DRT from centers reporting to the EUROC-DRT registry.
METHODS: We included 537 patients (112 with DRT and 425 without DRT) who had undergone LAAC between 12/2008 and 04/2019. Baseline and implantation characteristics, anti-thrombotic treatment and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups in uni- and multivariate analyses. Additional propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to focus on the role of implantation characteristics.
RESULTS: Patients with DRT showed higher rates of previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (49.1% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.01), spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (44.9% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.01) and lower left atrial appendage (LAA) peak emptying velocity (35.4 ± 18.5 vs. 42.4 ± 18.0 cm/s, p = 0.02). Occluders implanted in DRT patients were larger (25.5 ± 3.8 vs. 24.6 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.03) and implanted deeper in the LAA (mean depth: 7.6 ± 4.7 vs. 5.7 ± 4.7 mm, p < 0.01). Coverage of the appendage ostium was achieved less often in DRT patients (69.5% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.01), while DRT patients were less frequently on oral anticoagulation (7.1% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age, prior stroke/TIA and SEC as independent risk factors for DRT. After PSM, implantation depth was found to be predictive. Rates of stroke/TIA were higher in DRT patients (13.5% vs. 3.8%, Hazard Ratio: 4.21 [95%-confidence interval: 1.88-9.49], p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: DRT after LAAC is associated with adverse outcome and appears to be of multifactorial origin, depending on patient characteristics, anticoagulation regimen and device position.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Device-related thrombus; Left atrial appendage closure; Stroke

Year:  2022        PMID: 35849156     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02065-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   6.138


  15 in total

1.  Device-Related Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Laurent Fauchier; Alexandre Cinaud; François Brigadeau; Antoine Lepillier; Bertrand Pierre; Selim Abbey; Marjaneh Fatemi; Frederic Franceschi; Paul Guedeney; Peggy Jacon; Olivier Paziaud; Sandrine Venier; Jean Claude Deharo; Daniel Gras; Didier Klug; Jacques Mansourati; Gilles Montalescot; Olivier Piot; Pascal Defaye
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Data on Thrombus Characteristics, Treatment Strategies, and Clinical Outcomes From the EUROC-DRT-Registry.

Authors:  Alexander Sedaghat; Vivian Vij; Baravan Al-Kassou; Steffen Gloekler; Roberto Galea; Monika Fürholz; Bernhard Meier; Marco Valgimigli; Gilles O'Hara; Dabit Arzamendi; Victor Agudelo; Lluis Asmarats; Xavier Freixa; Eduardo Flores-Umanzor; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard; Luis Nombela-Franco; Angela McInerney; Kaspar Korsholm; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Shazia Afzal; Tobias Zeus; Felix Operhalski; Boris Schmidt; Gilles Montalescot; Paul Guedeney; Xavier Iriart; Noelie Miton; Jacqueline Saw; Thomas Gilhofer; Laurent Fauchier; Egzon Veliqi; Felix Meincke; Nils Petri; Peter Nordbeck; Szymon Rycerz; Dmitrii Ognerubov; Evgeny Merkulov; Ignacio Cruz-González; Rocio Gonzalez-Ferreiro; Deepak L Bhatt; Alessandra Laricchia; Antonio Mangieri; Heyder Omran; Jan Wilko Schrickel; Josep Rodes-Cabau; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Rebuttal with regards to "Device-associated thrombus formation after left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review of events reported with the Watchman, the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and the Amulet".

Authors:  M Lempereur; A Aminian; J Saw
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Pulmonary ridge coverage and device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  Xavier Freixa; Pedro Cepas-Guillen; Eduardo Flores-Umanzor; Ander Regueiro; Laura Sanchis; Andrea Fernandez-Valledor; Salvatore Brugaletta; Maria José Carretero; Barbara Vidal; Mónica Masotti; Victoria Martin-Yuste; Mercè Roqué; Marta Sitges; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.534

5.  Incidence, Characterization, and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Prospective Global AMPLATZER Amulet Observational Study.

Authors:  Adel Aminian; Boris Schmidt; Patrizio Mazzone; Sergio Berti; Sven Fischer; Matteo Montorfano; Simon Cheung Chi Lam; Juha Lund; Federico M Asch; Ryan Gage; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez; Heyder Omran; Giuseppe Tarantini; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 11.195

6.  Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Authors:  Srinivas R Dukkipati; Saibal Kar; David R Holmes; Shephal K Doshi; Vijendra Swarup; Douglas N Gibson; Brijeshwar Maini; Nicole T Gordon; Michael L Main; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Thrombus Formation After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With the Amplatzer Amulet Device.

Authors:  Alexander Sedaghat; Jan-Wilko Schrickel; René Andrié; Robert Schueler; Georg Nickenig; Christoph Hammerstingl
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-07-27

8.  Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device: full results of the prospective global observational study.

Authors:  David Hildick-Smith; Ulf Landmesser; A John Camm; Hans-Christoph Diener; Vince Paul; Boris Schmidt; Magnus Settergren; Emmanuel Teiger; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Vivek Y Reddy; Zoltan G Turi; Shephal K Doshi; Horst Sievert; Maurice Buchbinder; Christopher M Mullin; Peter Sick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Left atrial appendage patency and device-related thrombus after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Hubert Cochet; Xavier Iriart; Soumaya Sridi; Claudia Camaioni; Olivier Corneloup; Michel Montaudon; François Laurent; Wieme Selmi; Pauline Renou; Zakaria Jalal; Jean-Benoît Thambo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.