Literature DB >> 35846264

Reliability and Validity of Adapted Russian Version of Hospital for Special Surgery Lumbar Spine Surgery Expectations Survey.

Anton Denisov1, Nikita Zaborovskii1, Vladimir Solovyov1, Mikael Mamedov1, Dmitrii Mikhaylov1, Sergei Masevnin1, Oleg Smekalenkov1, Dmitrii Ptashnikov1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Patients' expectations are an important determinant in their decision to undergo lumbar spinal surgery-particularly their expectations of recovery after surgery. The Hospital for Special Surgery Lumbar Spine Surgery Expectations Survey (HSS-LSSES) is one tool used to assess this; however, the original version was only available in English. Objective: We sought to evaluate the reliability and validity of a translated and adapted Russian-language version of the HSS-LSSES.
Methods: This was a prospective study of 91 patients with degenerative disc disease who underwent lumbar spine surgery with instrumented fixation at a single institution in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Patients were recruited between December 2019 and February 2021 and asked about their expectations of surgery with a translated and adapted Russian version of the HSS-LSSES. To analyze construct validity, participants also completed disease-specific and general quality-of-life scales (Oswestry Disability Index, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; 2-way random effects model, absolute agreement) were used to determine test-retest reliability of the total score of the Russian HSS-LSSES. Internal consistency was evaluated through the estimation of Cronbach's alpha between the test and retest response of the questionnaire.
Results: The test-retest stability of the Russian HSS-LSSES evaluated through the estimation of ICC was found to have good stability. The instrument was shown to have high internal consistency.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a translated and adapted Russian version of HSS-LSSES had good internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, and no floor and ceiling effects. Therefore, we recommend its use as a tool for evaluating Russian-speaking patients' expectations before lumbar spine surgery.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lumbar fusion; patient’s expectations; spine surgery; validation

Year:  2021        PMID: 35846264      PMCID: PMC9247600          DOI: 10.1177/15563316211054097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  27 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica.

Authors:  G K Lutz; M E Butzlaff; S J Atlas; R B Keller; D E Singer; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  J N Gibson; G Waddell; I C Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

6.  Patients' expectations of lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; Roland Duculan; Marina Stal; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J N Katz; G Stucki; S J Lipson; A H Fossel; L J Grobler; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome?

Authors:  Albert Yee; Nana Adjei; Jennifer Do; Michael Ford; Joel Finkelstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Astrid Junge; Achim Elfering; Jiri Dvorak; François Porchet; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Dominik Golicki; Michał Jakubczyk; Katarzyna Graczyk; Maciej Niewada
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.