| Literature DB >> 35840162 |
Nicholas G Battaglia1, Joseph D Murphy1, Taylor P Uccello1, Angela Hughson2, Nicholas W Gavras2, Johnathan J Caldon3, Scott A Gerber1,2, Edith M Lord4.
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly employed to treat solid tumors. Immune checkpoint blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and CTLA-4 improves survival in RT patients, yet many fail to respond to combination therapy. Natural killer group 2 (NKG2) family receptors, particularly inhibitory NKG2A and activating NKG2D, have emerged as promising therapeutic targets to improve antitumor T cell responses; thus, we examined how these receptors and their ligands (Qa-1b and retinoic acid early inducible 1 [Rae-1], respectively) regulate the RT response in C57BL/6 mice bearing syngeneic B16F10 melanoma and MC38 colorectal adenocarcinoma tumors. RT (15 Gy) transiently reduced B16F10 tumor burden, whereas MC38 tumors exhibited durable response to RT. Intratumoral NK and CD8 T cells expressed NKG2A and NKG2D in both models, which was unaltered by RT. In vitro/in vivo RT increased tumor/stromal cell Qa-1b and Rae-1 expression in both models, especially B16F10 tumors, but IFN-γ stimulation induced both Qa-1b and Rae-1 only in B16F10 tumors. NKG2A/Qa-1b inhibition alone did not improve RT response in either model, but combined RT and NKG2A/PD-1 blockade improved survival in the B16F10 model. Depletion experiments indicate that the triple therapy efficacy is CD8 T cell-dependent with negligible NK cell contribution. RNA sequencing of CD8 T cells from triple therapy-treated B16F10 tumors showed increased proliferative capacity compared with RT and PD-1 blockade alone. Our work demonstrates that RT modulates NKG2A ligand expression, which inhibits RT-induced T cell responses in tumors that fail to respond to combined RT and PD-1 blockade. These results provide a rationale for combining NKG2A blockade with immune checkpoint blockade therapies and RT to improve clinical response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35840162 PMCID: PMC9339479 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol ISSN: 0022-1767 Impact factor: 5.426