The nonpolymorphic MHC Qa-1b mediates CD8+ T cell surveillance of antigen-processing defects.

The nonclassical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Qa-1b accommodates monomorphic leader peptides and functions as a ligand for germ line receptors CD94/NKG2, which are expressed by natural killer cells and CD8+ T cells. We here describe that the conserved peptides are replaced by a novel peptide repertoire of surprising diversity as a result of impairments in the antigen-processing pathway. This novel peptide repertoire represents immunogenic neoantigens for CD8+ T cells, as we found that these Qa-1b-restricted T cells dominantly participated in the response to tumors with processing deficiencies. A surprisingly wide spectrum of target cells, irrespective of transformation status, MHC background, or type of processing deficiency, was recognized by this T cell subset, complying with the conserved nature of Qa-1b. Target cell recognition depended on T cell receptor and Qa-1b interaction, and immunization with identified peptide epitopes demonstrated in vivo priming of CD8+ T cells. Our data reveal that Qa-1b, and most likely its human homologue human leukocyte antigen-E, is important for the defense against processing-deficient cells by displacing the monomorphic leader peptides, which relieves the inhibition through CD94/NKG2A on lymphocytes, and by presenting a novel repertoire of immunogenic peptides, which recruits a subset of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells.

Qa-1b and its human homologue human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-E are conserved MHC class I like molecules, often categorized as “nonclassical” or class Ib MHC. Similar to the classical MHC molecules, they accommodate small peptides in their binding grooves and present these on the cell surface (Jensen et al., 2004; Rodgers and Cook, 2005). Crystal structures of HLA-E show that the overall fold of the peptide–MHC complex is very similar to that of the classical MHC class I molecules (O’Callaghan et al., 1998). The unique feature of Qa-1b and HLA-E resides in the very limited number of alleles that is present in the population (Grimsley et al., 2002; Hermel et al., 2004): as few as two alleles exist in the human population, differing in just one amino acid; this difference has hardly any functional consequence (Strong et al., 2003). The monomorphic nature of Qa-1b and HLA-E is underlined by the finding that they are predominantly filled with one peptide ligand, which is derived from the signal sequence of classical MHC class I molecules, often referred to as Qa-1 determinant modifier (Qdm; Aldrich et al., 1994; DeCloux et al., 1997). These signal peptides are strikingly conserved in all tested mammalian species (Kurepa et al., 1998), pointing at an important function of this peptide–MHC combination for the immune system. A substantial body of evidence reveals that it regulates NK cells and CTLs via the heterodimeric receptors CD94/NKG2A and CD94/NKG2C (Braud et al., 1998a; Vance et al., 1999; Rodgers and Cook, 2005). These germline-encoded receptors specifically engage the Qdm peptide when bound to Qa-1b/HLA-E because residues at peptide position 5 and 8 are part of the surface interface of the CD94/NKG2 receptors (Kaiser et al., 2008; Petrie et al., 2008). Interestingly, this interaction is quite similar to the footprint of the hyper variable regions of the T cell receptor on peptide–MHC class I (Rudolph and Wilson, 2002). Absence of these Qdm side chain residues results in lack of receptor engagement (Valés-Gómez et al., 1999; Miller et al., 2003), indicating that this innate receptor is truly peptide specific. Qdm–Qa-1b complexes act as remote sensors of integrity of the MHC class I antigen-processing machinery, because defects in proteasomal cleavage, TAP-mediated peptide transport, signal peptidases or tapasin-mediated peptide loading all result in failure to process and present Qdm peptides (Braud et al., 1998b; Lemberg et al., 2001; Bland et al., 2003; Li et al., 2004). The lack of Qdm–Qa-1b complexes at the cell surface is sensed by NK cells expressing CD94/NKG2 receptors, and allows for immunosurveillance of such processing-deficient cells (Lu et al., 2006). Thus, this receptor/ligand system is a major molecular mechanism behind the “missing self” principle of NK cell reactivity (Ljunggren and Kärre, 1990).

In addition to their role in the innate immune system, Qa-1b and HLA-E serve the adaptive response as well. T cell receptor recognition of these nonclassical MHCs has been described in the context of immunity against intracellular pathogens, e.g., Listeria, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Seaman et al., 1999; Lo et al., 2000; Heinzel et al., 2002), suggesting that foreign antigens can replace the “self” Qdm peptides and be recognized by CD8+ T cells. HLA-E–restricted T cells specific for the human Qdm homologue do exist, but have only been reported in response to allogeneic MHC (García et al., 2002; Romagnani et al., 2002). Furthermore, Qa-1b–restricted CD8+ T cells have been implicated in the regulation of experimental autoimmune diseases (for review see Jiang and Chess, 2000; Lu et al., 2006). The antigenic targets of these regulatory T cells are most likely of self origin, but different from Qdm. These data reveal that Qa-1b/HLA-E–restricted T cells are present in the host, but that the specificity, diversity, and function of this T cell subset await further investigation.

Here, we describe the existence of a surprisingly broad peptide repertoire that is presented by Qa-1b on cells with impairments in the antigen-processing machinery. These peptides replace Qdm and are targeted by a unique population of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Normal cells with intact processing machinery were not recognized by these Qa-1b–restricted CTL, but partial defects readily resulted in the appearance of the immunogenic self peptides, which are derived from housekeeping proteins. Interestingly, we show that these Qa-1b–restricted T cells are abundantly present in the immune response to processing deficient tumors. Our data show that the nonclassical Qa-1b molecule plays a prominent role in the adaptive immune response as a restriction element for T cells and presents a much larger peptide repertoire than thus far anticipated.

RESULTS

Qa-1b–restricted T cells are frequently present in the immune response against TAP-deficient tumors

We previously described that the immune response against TAP-deficient tumors comprises Qa-1b–restricted T cells among T cells with MHC restriction to the classical class I molecules (van Hall et al., 2006). This prompted us to determine the relative contribution of this Qa-1b–restricted subset to the overall response. Mice were immunized with syngeneic TAP-deficient RMA-S cells expressing the co-stimulatory molecule CD80. Ex vivo–cultured spleens were examined for IFN-γ production against the parental RMA-S lymphoma, the β2m-negative C4.4-25 line, and a panel of single class I–expressing EC7.1 cells, which are MHC class I–loss variants of RMA-S (Howell et al., 2000; Table I). All polyclonal ex vivo cultures responded to RMA-S, but not against the β2m-negative lymphoma, indicating that they exhibited specific T cell reactivity against TAP-deficient tumors, and not merely reflected natural killer (NK) cell reactivity. Dissection of these IFN-γ responses revealed a codominance of Qa-1b–restricted activity compared with those restricted by the classical Db- and Kb-molecules, as the majority of the examined 12 independent cultures produced high IFN-γ levels when incubated with EC7.1.Qa-1b (Table I). These data suggested that the nonclassical MHC class I Qa-1b frequently acts as an antigen presentation molecule for T cells, and can even overrule the classical MHC class I molecules.

Table I.

Detection of Qa-1b–directed IFN-γ responses in ex vivo cultures

Target cellsa	Independent T cell cultureb
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
RMA-S	5,723c	10,113	1,204	6,582	12,199	4,896	2,894	10,389	1,359	11,593	4,320	1,567
C4.4-25	97	84	92	82	164	61	23	18	106	61	47	14
EC7.1	364	712	310	216	1,311	799	273	81	485	564	418	38
EC7.1.Kb	5,886	11,270	538	7,184	16,031	2,526	441	8,309	405	11,111	1,552	837
EC7.1.Db	888	7,507	645	690	10,113	2,125	1,129	604	648	8,314	1,561	446
EC7.1.Qa-1b	2,053	5,579	3,330	6,677	16,265	3,108	2,999	272	1,410	8,827	2,697	7,039
EC7.1.cont	380	700	386	250	1,370	1,065	418	63	591	620	401	56
Medium	287	120	287	152	276	156	177	38	218	110	74	13

RMA-S is TAP2 deficient; C4.4-25 is β2m deficient; EC7.1 is a MHC class I–deficient variant of RMA-S. Single class I genes were reconstituted in EC7.1.

12 mice were immunized with RMA-S.B7 and spleens were stimulated twice in vitro with RMA-S.B7 before testing.

Concentration of IFN-γ released by ex vivo cultures (pg/ml).

Critical involvement of Qa-1b and the T cell receptor in target cell recognition

To characterize these Qa-1b–restricted T cells, we isolated several T cell clones from the aforementioned cultures and extensively explored the expression and function of surface receptors. All clones displayed a classical CTL phenotype and expressed CD3, CD8αβ, and TCRαβ (Fig. S1). Different rearranged TCR Vβ segments were used (unpublished data), validating the independent origin of the clones and indicating that Qa-1b recognition does not constrain the TCR repertoire. In addition to the T cell lineage receptors, the T cell clones also expressed CD94, NKG2A, NKG2C, and NKG2D, receptors that are frequently found on NK cells, which interact with nonclassical MHC class I molecules, including Qa-1b. Importantly, NK lineage markers NK1.1 and DX5, and CD16, CD32, and CD244 (2B4) were not expressed. Neither were receptors of the lectin Ly49 family, which interact with classical MHC class I (Fig. S1 and not depicted). We concluded that our Qa-1b–restricted T cells are indistinguishable at the phenotypic level from conventional CD8+ T cells restricted by classical MHC (McMahon and Raulet, 2001), but are clearly distinct from the reported Qa-1–recognizing intestinal γδ+ T cells (Davies et al., 2004) and Qa-1–restricted regulatory CD8αα+ T cell subset (Tang et al., 2006).

To carefully determine the Qa-1b restriction of our isolated T cell clones, we examined their reactivity against two cell panels, based on the TAP-negative EC7.1 lymphoma and TAP-deficient B78H1 melanoma (Fig. 1; Howell et al., 2000; Chiang et al., 2003). Both cell lines are also devoid of MHC class I proteins and single class I molecules were reconstituted by gene transfer. All isolated T cell clones exhibited cytolytic activity (Fig. 1 A) and produced IFN-γ (Fig. 1 B and Fig. S2) against the Qa-1b–expressing cells, but not against cells in which only Db or Kb were introduced. These data convincingly demonstrated the Qa-1b restriction of our T cells and excluded cross-reactivity to the classical class I molecules. Qdm-specific control CTL did not recognize the TAP-deficient tumor targets, as the presentation of Qdm in Qa-1b is TAP dependent (Aldrich et al., 1994). Exogenous loading of Qdm conferred reactivity for this CTL clone (Fig. 1, right). A direct interaction with Qa-1b was revealed by the finding that anti–Qa-1b antibody strongly blocked the recognition by our CTL (Fig. 2 A).

Figure 1.

Selective recognition of Qa-1 Isolated T cell clones were tested against panels of TAP-deficient lymphoma (EC7.1) and melanoma (B78H1) cells. Both cell lines are also deficient in MHC class I (Howell et al., 2000; Chiang et al., 2003) and were reconstituted with constructs encoding H-2Db, -Kb, or Qa-1b. Cytotoxic activity against Qa-1b–expressing EC7.1 cells (A) and IFN-γ production against Qa-1b-expressing B78H1 cells (B) by three independent T cell clones. Control Qdm-specific CTL failed to recognize the Qa-1b expressing targets because of the absence of TAP, unless pulsed with the Qdm peptide (right). Means and standard deviations of triplicate wells are shown for one out of three comparable experiments.

Figure 2.

The T cell receptor, but not NKG2A/C, mediates reactivity of the T cells. (A) Blocking antibody against Qa-1b demonstrated a direct role of this molecule for T cell recognition. Experiment was performed using EC7.1.Qa-1b target cells and repeated three times with similar outcome. (B) Blocking CD3 or CD8 with monoclonal antibodies decreased T cell reactivity against TAP-deficient EC7.1.Qa-1b target cells. Antibodies against NKG2A/C did not alter the T cell response, indicating that only the T cell receptor is critically involved in mediating reactivity. Data are representative of four experiments. (C) Exogenous peptide loading competes with endogenously presented epitopes on EC7.1.Qa-1b cells and inhibits the recognition of these target cells by Qa-1b–restricted CTL (left). Qdm (AMAPRTLLL) or Qdm L8K (AMAPRTLKL) peptides were loaded exogenously at the indicated concentrations on EC7.1.Qa-1b cells and IFN-γ release by CTL was measured. Control peptide was the Kb-binding 8-mer SIINFEKL from OVA. The Qdm L8K mutant peptide–Qa-1b complexes fail to interact with CD94/NKG2A or CD94/NKG2C (Kraft et al., 2000), indicating that the loaded peptides interfere with T cell receptor–mediated reactivity. Qdm-specific control CTL (right) was activated by the peptides. Means and standard deviations of triplicate wells are shown for one out of three comparable experiments.

Next, we examined the involvement of antigen-receptors in target cell recognition. Although CD94/NKG2A and CD94/NKG2C do engage Qa-1b (Rodgers and Cook, 2005) and were expressed by our isolated T cell clones, their involvement was not likely, because TAP-negative cells are devoid of peptide ligands for these receptors (Gays et al., 2001). Indeed, blocking with NKG2A/C-specific antibodies did not alter the response, whereas anti-CD3 and -CD8 antibodies clearly inhibited the recognition of EC7.1.Qa-1b cells (Fig. 2 B). A role for NKG2D was also not likely, as our RMA-based lymphoma panel lacks NKG2D ligands (Diefenbach et al., 2000). Together, these data indicated that the TCR governed the reactivity of our Qa-1b–restricted CTL.

Furthermore, exogenous loading with excessive amounts of competing Qdm peptides inhibited T cell recognition of EC7.1.Qa-1b cells (Fig. 2 C). Similar competition was found when the Qdm variant L8K was used (AMAPRTLKL), but not with irrelevant control peptide (Fig. 2 C, left). Qdm-specific control CTL confirmed that both peptides are efficiently loaded on the target cells (Fig. 2 C, right). The fact that the position 8 substitution in the peptide L8K prevents engagement to CD94/NKG2A receptors (Kraft et al., 2000), but retained the capacity to inhibit T cell reactivity in our assays, substantiated our findings that target cell recognition is regulated by TCR-mediated interaction with Qa-1b and not by NK receptors.

TAP- and MHC heavy chain deficiencies are targeted by Qa-1b–restricted CTL

To evaluate the appearance of the peptide epitopes on target cells that express natural levels of Qa-1b, we tested B cell blasts from spleens of wild-type, TAP1-deficient, and β2m-deficient mice as targets for three independently derived CTL clones (Fig. 3 A). TAP1-deficient cells were efficiently recognized by all three clones, but wild-type and β2m-deficient cells were not. Qdm-specific control CTL selectively responded to wild-type cells, indicating that the absence of Qdm peptides caused by the TAP defect promoted the presentation of the new peptide epitopes. Qa-1b surface levels on TAP1-deficient cells were lower than on wild-type cells, but were clearly higher than the background levels on β2m-deficient cells (unpublished data).

Figure 3.

Qa-1 (A) LPS-stimulated B cell blasts from wild-type (B6), TAP1−/−, and β2m−/− mice were used as targets for Qa-1b–restricted CTL (left) or control Qdm-specific CTL (right). (B) LPS-stimulated B cell blasts from wild-type (B6), MHC class I knockout, and MHC class I/β2m knockout mice were tested for recognition by Qa-1b–restricted CTL (left) or control Qdm-specific CTL (right). Graphs display representative experiments out of four performed. Means and standard deviations of triplicates are shown.

We also analyzed CTL reactivity against MHC class I heavy chain deficiencies with the use of B cell blasts from H-2Db and Kb knockout mice. Qdm peptides are derived from the leader sequence of H-2Db (Aldrich et al., 1994), and loss of this allele resulted in recognition by two of the three CTL clones, whereas deficiency in Kb heavy chains did not result in recognition (Fig. 3 B). These subtle differences between the CTL clones suggested that the cognate peptides are differentially influenced by loss of MHC class I heavy chains. Strikingly, all three CTL clones strongly responded to cells devoid of both alleles (H-2DbKb knockout; Fig. 3 B). Control blasts lacking β2m and H-2DbKb (triple knockout) were not recognized. These results revealed an unexpected influence of the Kb molecule on the Qa-1b–presented antigenic peptides, in that removal of Kb molecules from H-2Db–deficient cells strongly enhanced epitope display (Fig. 3 B). The underlying mechanism of this effect is currently elusive. The degree of CTL response to H-2DbKb knockout cells was comparable to TAP-deficient cells (Fig. 3 A), indicating that both defects led to optimal presentation of the new Qa-1b peptides. Interestingly, Qdm-specific CTL were able to differentiate between these two target populations, confirming previous findings that this CTL clone is also reactive to TAP-dependent peptides other than Qdm (Cotterill et al., 1997; Gays et al., 2001). Together, these results demonstrated that our Qa-1b–restricted CTL interact with peptides on activated B cells with defects in the antigen presentation route.

CTL reactivity against tumors with partial processing impairments

We then determined CTL reactivity against tumor cells with TAP dysfunction and tumor cells with undefined deficiencies in the processing machinery. Ad5-transformed mouse embryo cells (Ad5MEC) and chemically induced fibrosarcoma cells (methylcholantrene [MCA]), both derived from TAP1-knockout mice, were recognized by the Qa-1b–restricted CTL (Fig. 4 A). Correction of the TAP1 defect by gene transfer resulted in decreased recognition by our CTL and strongly increased recognition by the Qdm-specific control CTL (Fig. 4 A). Thus, the alternative Qa-1b–binding peptide antigens are expressed in a wide array of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic tissues of normal and transformed cells, including B cells, fibroblasts, lymphoma, melanoma, and sarcoma, and emerge at the cell surface of cells with genetic disruption of the TAP peptide transporter.

Figure 4.

Partial deficiencies in the processing pathway of tumor cells induce the novel Qa-1 (A) Qa-1b–restricted CTL respond to Ad5-transformed mouse cells (Ad5MEC) and fibrosarcoma cells (MCA) that are derived from TAP1 knockout mice. Recognition was lost upon gene transfer of mouse TAP1 in these cell lines (+ TAP1). Qdm-specific control CTL displayed opposing specificity, indicating that the Qdm peptide is only presented on TAP-proficient tumor cells (right). (B) Four colon carcinoma cell lines from BALB/c (C26 and CC36) or C57BL/6 (MC38 and CMT93) background were used as targets for both CTL types. Pretreatment with IFN-γ to boost the antigen-processing and presentation machinery resulted in decreased reactivity by the Qa-1b–restricted CTL, whereas gene transfer of the viral TAP-inhibitor UL49.5 (van Hall et al., 2007) led to strongly increased recognition. Again, Qdm-specific control CTL displayed opposing specificity (right). Means and standard deviations of triplicates are shown from one representative experiment out of four.

However, human tumors mostly display partial deficiencies in their processing pathway that originate at the transcriptional level, resulting in an impairment, but not a complete shutdown, in the generation of the human counterpart of Qdm–Qa-1b complexes. To assess whether the CTL were also capable of recognizing such tumor cells, we tested four chemically induced mouse colon carcinomas, which are known to possess peptide presentation capacity (Rodolfo et al., 1994; Yang and Perry-Lalley, 2000). Qdm-specific control CTL, indeed, recognized all four cell lines, demonstrating functional processing machinery (Fig. 4 B, right). Interestingly, our Qa-1b–restricted CTL responded to all carcinoma lines, albeit to varying extents (Fig. 4 B, left). Treatment of the carcinomas with the immunostimulatory cytokine IFN-γ, which strongly improves the processing and presentation capacity of cells, resulted in decreased recognition, pointing at partial processing defects in the carcinomas that were corrected by IFN-γ. In line with this idea, gene transfer of the viral TAP inhibitor UL49.5 (van Hall et al., 2007) led to a strongly increased recognition by our CTL. As expected, the Qdm-specific control CTL clone exhibited the opposite reactivity profile (Fig. 4 B, right). Of note, the four colon carcinoma lines were derived from two mouse strains with different MHC typing, BALB/c with H-2d alleles (C26 and CC36) and C57BL/6 with H-2b alleles (MC38 and CMT93), nicely illustrating the conserved nature of Qa-1, which is the same in these strains.

We concluded that our Qa-1b–restricted CTL recognize peptide epitopes that even appear on the surface of cells with mild or partial processing impairments, implying that a mixture of Qdm and TAP-independent peptides can coexist in Qa-1b.

Determination of the Qa-1b–presented peptide repertoire

We set out to determine the nature of the TAP-independent peptides that are presented by Qa-1b via biochemical purification and tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Because of the lack of suitable Qa-1b–specific antibodies, we made use of a chimeric MHC class I molecule in which the peptide binding domains (α 1 and 2) of Qa-1b were coupled to the constant α 3 domain of Db, against which good precipitating antibodies are available. This chimeric Qa-1b/Db molecule was introduced into TAP2-negative EC7.1 cells and to compare the corresponding TAP-dependent peptide repertoire, we also created a TAP2-reconstituted variant of EC7.1.Qa-1b/Db cells. Flow cytometry data confirmed that EC7.1.Qa-1b/Db cells only expressed this chimeric molecule on the cell surface and not the endogenous Db molecule, excluding the risk that we would purify Db-binding peptides with our α 3–directed antibody (Fig. 5 A). Analysis of TAP2 expression in EC7.1.Qa-1b/Db and in the TAP-transfected variant confirmed the absence of TAP2 protein in the first and successful reconstitution in the other (Fig. 5 B). Analysis with our Qa-1b–restricted CTL and Qdm-specific CTL confirmed that our EC7.1 cell lines represented two extremes of the antigen-processing status, in that the TAP-negative line did not present Qdm and that reconstitution of TAP2 led to a disappearance of the newly defined peptides and that the chimeric molecule functionally presented Qa-1b–bound peptides (Fig. 5 C).

Figure 5.

Identification of the TAP-independent peptide repertoire of Qa-1 (A) The chimeric Qa-1b/Db class I molecule was expressed in EC7.1 cells, which are TAP- and MHC class I–negative. TAP-positive counterparts were generated by introduction of the TAP2 gene. Surface display on EC7.1.Qa-1b/Db cells of the chimeric molecule and absence of the endogenous Db molecule was determined by flow cytometry with Qa-1b– and Dbα3-specific antibodies and Dbα2-specific antibody, respectively, as indicated in the histogram plots (clone KH95 and also H131-31; not depicted). Staining of TAP-reconstituted cells gave comparable results. Control TAP-proficient RMA cells displayed endogenous Qa-1b and Db molecules. (B) TAP expression was analyzed on RMA, RMA-S, EC7.1, and EC7.1.TAP2 cells by Western blot using the antibody TAP2.688 against mouse TAP2. Results confirmed the lack of TAP2 expression on EC7.1 and RMA-S cells. (C) The chimeric construct was recognized by CTL clones: the TAP-negative variant only by Qa-1b–restricted CTL (black bars) and the TAP-positive variant only by Qdm-specific CTL (gray bars). Means and standard deviations of triplicate wells are shown from one representative experiment out of four. (D) Peptide purification and MS analysis revealed the wide diversity of the TAP-negative peptide repertoire, whereas the TAP-positive peptide repertoire was mainly limited to the Qdm peptide. Data were collected from four independent experiments in the case of TAP-negative repertoire and two independent experiments for TAP-positive repertoire. Number of different peptides with indicated length is depicted of 84 identified peptides that are listed in Table II.

Table II.

List of Qa-1b-binding peptides isolated from TAP-positive and TAP-negative tumor cells

Peptide number	Peptide sequence	Peptide location	Protein length	UniProtKB or SwissProt number	Protein description
TAP-positive
1	AMAPRTLLL	3-11	362	P01899	H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen, D-B alpha chain
2	AQAERTPEL	691-699	1274	A2RT67	DENN domain-containing protein 3
3	IINTHTLLL	1302-1310	1657	Q80UW7	IQ motif containing GTPase activating protein 1
4	PKFEVIDKPQS	98-108	108	P97450	ATP synthase-coupling factor 6, mitochondrial
5	PTEEESPV	486-493	493	P53986	Monocarboxylate transporter 1
6	QAIPQGAIQ	246-254	461	Q8BG99	Homeobox protein PKNOX2
7	QLQPQQPLPQPQ	125-136	672	Q9WVH4	Forkhead protein FKHR2
TAP-negative
1	AAIENIEHL	1193-1201	1392	Q6PB66	Leucine-rich PPR motif-containing protein, mitochondrial
2	AALKLGQEL	799-807	1271	Q9JJ28	Protein flightless-1 homologue
3	AAPTNANSLNSTF	454-466	575	Q8BT14	CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 4
4	AAPTSPDHSPA	699-709	709	Q66L44	Protein Dos
5	AAVIAHDFL	153-161	292	P30282	G1/S-specific cyclin-D3
6	AGIENDEAF	44-52	248	B1AWD9	Clathrin light polypeptide
7	AGPENSSKI	383-346	2075	Q80XK6	Autophagy-related protein 2 homologue B
8	AGQFNQDYL	45-53	503	Q921F1	Annexin A11
9	AGVRNPQQHL	515-524	636	Q8BN32	Pabpc1 protein
10	ASLQNFNISNL	2103-2113	2128	B2RRJ7	Wnk1 protein
11	KSISNPPGSNL	2115-2125	2128	B2RRJ7	Wnk1 protein
12	ASQQNSEEM	202-210	210	Q9CXE2	B-cell CLL/lymphoma 7 protein family member A
13	ASVLNVNHI	2195-2203	2603	Q99NH0	Ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 17
14	ASYRAQPSVSL	270-280	573	Q62019	16 kD protein
15	ATPGRLIDFL	256-265	648	Q5U222	Ddx5 protein
16	AVSEGTKAVTKYTSAK	111-126	126	Q8CGP1	Histone H2B type 1-K
17	FAPLPRLPTL	17-26	156	Q9CR21	Acyl carrier protein, mitochondrial
18	FAPVNVTTEVKSVE	280-293	462	P10126	Elongation factor 1-alpha 1
19	FAYEGRDYI	137-145	184	Q62143	Qa-2 cell surface antigen
20	FGPVNHEEL	33-41	147	P46414	Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B
21	FQIVNPHLL	634-642	792	Q6NZB3	Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase
22	FQVTHTVAL	113-121	361	Q9QYA2	Mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM40 homologue
23	GGPINPATA	1036-1044	1107	Q80X50	Ubiquitin-associated protein 2-like
24	GLGVLLAF	5-12	113	Q8QZT4	Crumbs protein homologue 3
25	HSIQNSQDM	61-69	210	Q91YN9	BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 2
26	IQKTPQIQVY	21-30	119	P01887	Beta-2-microglobulin
27	KAPPPLPPLVVF	27-38	499	P16277	Tyrosine-protein kinase BLK
28	KAPTNEFYA	190-198	198	O35988	Syndecan-4
29	KCSVSIQVVDVNDNYPEL	328-345	794	Q91XZ8	Protocadherin beta 22
30	KSAVGHEYV	96-107	486	Q922I8	Hematopoietic cell specific Lyn substrate 1
31	LAIRNDEEL	93-101	137	Q64426	Histone H2A
32	LVRPGTALEL	2294-2303	2883	NP_076331	desmoplakin
33	METLTATPQ	976-984	1241	B2RXW8	Ppfia1 protein
34	NSIRNLDTI	100-108	475	P28658	Ataxin-10
35	PADIVKNLK	12-20	341	Q8VDZ8	Calcium binding protein 39
36	PDTGISSKA	52-60	126	Q8CGP2	Histone H2B type 1-P
37	PEAFPALA	385-392	392	Q9CY58	Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 RNA-binding protein
38	PNKLVELNK	138-146	943	Q6DFV7	Nuclear receptor coactivator 7
39	PPSAKAAID	97-105	323	Q5SSG6	TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor
40	PPTAKAAVE	425-433	661	Q5SUS9	Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1
41	PVKAVEIEI	155-163	930	Q7TSZ1	Xeroderma pigmentosum, complementation group C
42	RSPENPPSKEL	171-181	181	Q9CQA0	Centromere protein M
43	RSPGNSPTPM	186-195	469	Q8CI61	BAG family molecular chaperone regulator 4
44	SALINLSSF	7-15	161	Q8VE65	Transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 12
45	SAPENAVRM	28-36	126	O35127	Protein C10
46	SAPSNFEHR	12-20	593	Q8BTW9	Serine/threonine-protein kinase PAK 4
47	SAPTGSGKTL	227-236	639	Q6P9R1	ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX51
48	SAVISLEGKPL	156-166	166	P18760	Cofilin-1
49	SAVSNNYIQTL	168-178	911	P30999	Catenin delta-1
50	SHRKFSAPR	2-10	403	Q3U9L3	ribosomal protein L3P family member
51	SLGINPHVL	966-974	1170	B2RQL0	Nup98 protein
52	SLGKNPTDAYL	60-70	172	Q3THE2	Myosin regulatory light chain MRLC2
53	SQPESKVFYL	110-119	245	P63101	Protein kinase C inhibitor protein 1
54	SSTTNPKLSTL	726-736	959	Q5NBZ5	Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor 1
55	STIRLLTSL	458-466	545	P80318	T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma
56	TNPESKVFYL	155-160	284	P68254	14-3-3 protein theta
57	TQGQNIQHL	431-439	2326	Q80YT7	Myomegalin
58	VAVTNGPRS	371-379	393	Q9D6J1	LAG1 longevity assurance homologue 4
59	VPPVQVSPLIKFGRY	2-16	71	Q5EBI8	ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1F0 complex
60	VQVSNFKSGKGDSTL	254-268	579	Q80WJ7	Metastasis adhesion protein
61	VSLLDIDHL	473-481	679	Q8BQM4	HEAT repeat-containing protein 3
62	VSLLNPPETL	411-420	422	Q8BRG1	Cyclin A2, isoform CRA
63	VTLVNHGSTF	15-24	640	P59110	SUMO-1 protease 2
64	YGYSNRVVDLM	316-326	333	P16858	Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
65	AAPRSGPSV	611-619	641	Q923D5	WW domain-binding protein 11
66	AAPRSGPSVA	611-620	641	Q923D5	WW domain-binding protein 11
67	AGIENKFGL	648-656	676	Q9QXX4	Calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein Aralar2
68	AGIENKFGLYL	648-658	676	Q9QXX4	Calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein Aralar2
69	AGIENKFGLYLP	648-659	676	Q9QXX4	Calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier protein Aralar2
70	TKAVTKYTSSK	117-127	127	A0JNS9	Histone H2B
71	GTKAVTKYTSSK	116-127	127	A0JNS9	Histone H2B
72	SEGTKAVTKYTSSK	114-127	127	A0JNS9	Histone H2B
73	VSEGTKAVTKYTSSK	113-127	127	A0JNS9	Histone H2B
74	AVSEGTKAVTKYTSSK	112-127	127	A0JNS9	Histone H2B
75	PEPAKSAPAPK	2-12	126	Q64478	Histone H2B type 1-H
76	PEPAKSAPAPKKG	2-14	126	Q64478	Histone H2B type 1-H
77	LGVKNSEPA	59-67	576	Q80UG5	Septin-9
78	LGVKNSEPAA	59-68	576	Q80UG5	Septin-9
79	SSPANISSLEFEDA	583-596	773	P51125	Calpastatin
80	SSPANISSLEFEDAK	583-597	773	P51125	Calpastatin
81	SSPANISSLEFEDAKLS	583-599	773	P51125	Calpastatin
82	SSPANISSLEFEDAKLSA	583-600	773	P51125	Calpastatin
83	KPLFEILNG	1138-1146	1735	Q9IZU3	Endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus Mtv1
84	KPLFEILNGD	1138-1147	1735	Q9IZU3	Endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus Mtv1

MS of peptide species from purified Qa-1b molecules demonstrated an evident difference between the two peptide repertoires. The peptide repertoire of TAP-positive cells was strikingly dominated by the Qdm peptide AMAPRTLLL (Table II). Six other peptide sequences were identified, but these represented only minor constituents (together <5% of the total ion count). In contrast, Qa-1b from TAP-negative cells was filled with a remarkable diversity of peptides from endogenous proteins (Table II). No peptide clearly stood out in terms of quantity. More than 150 tandem mass fragmentation profiles sufficiently matched with the mouse IPI protein database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI/IPImouse.html) and analysis of their corresponding synthetic peptides confirmed the amino acid sequence of 84 peptides. The other peptide masses could not be matched with a known peptide sequence, but did not correspond to Qdm or previously defined Qa-1b–binding peptides (Rodgers and Cook, 2005). The lengths of the TAP-independent peptides ranged from 8 to 18 amino acids, but the majority were 9 amino acids long (Fig. 5 D). Seven peptides were found in length variants (Table II, numbers 65 to 84), and six of these families varied at their C terminus, reminiscent of leader peptide processing (Martoglio and Dobbertein, 1998). However, only one of these families was actually encoded in the leader domain, suggesting that amino acid trimming at the C terminus might be a feature of TAP-independent peptides in general. Strikingly, no clear binding motif could be elucidated in our peptide repertoire, although previous studies with synthetic peptide libraries showed a dominant role for position 2 (M or L; Kraft et al., 2000). The C terminus of the peptides frequently contained an aliphatic amino acid (L, I, M, A, and F; Table II), as found for most mouse MHC class I alleles.

We concluded that the presence of the high-affinity binding peptide Qdm in the groove of Qa-1b prevents the accommodation and display of a broad array of alternative peptides and that this new repertoire only emerges upon processing defects.

Immunogenicity of the Qa-1b-binding peptides

A direct consequence of the absence of this alternative peptide repertoire under physiological conditions is that this repertoire may comprise neoantigens for the CD8+ T cell system. To estimate the immunogenicity of the identified Qa-1b–binding peptides, we tested them in a matrix-based screening approach in which each peptide was systematically represented in two different peptide pools containing five peptides each. None of our Qa-1b–restricted T cell clones recognized peptides from the identified repertoire, so polyclonal responder T cells from mice immunized with TAP-deficient EC7.1.Qa-1b.B7 tumors were applied, assuring that the peptide-directed responses were induced by naturally presented antigens. Responses of 25 independent T cell cultures were compiled and final immunogenicity scores revealed several immunogenic peptides (Fig. 6 A). These peptide antigens had no common amino acid motif and were derived from different housekeeping proteins (see corresponding numbers in Table II), again pointing at the broad diversity of this antigen repertoire. To assess the potency of the five most immunogenic peptide sequences (number 3, 12, 17, 29, and 41) to induce CD8+ T cell responses in vivo, we immunized mice with the peptides in conjunction with imiquimod as adjuvant. After two vaccinations, clear populations of peptide-specific CD8+ T cells were detectable in the blood (Fig. 6, B–D). The peptides with the largest T cell populations also scored high in the immunogenicity screen in which tumor-stimulated T cells were applied (Fig. 6 A). Interestingly, peptide immunizations in H-2Db−/−Kb−/− mice did not lead to a population of IFN-γ–positive CD8+ T cells, indicating that the T cell repertoire in these knockout mice is tolerant for the novel Qa-1b binding peptides (Fig. S3). This is in line with the finding that H-2Db−/−Kb−/− target cells efficiently presented these peptides (Fig. 3 B), which are part of the normal Qa-1b peptide repertoire inducing central tolerance in these mice. Importantly, the vaccine-induced CD8+ T cells in wild-type mice exhibited strong cytolytic reactivity in vivo against target cells that were loaded with the relevant peptide (Fig. 6, E–G). Unloaded target cells and cells loaded with Qdm peptide were not killed in vivo. Vaccination with the Qdm peptide did not trigger any T cell immunity, illustrating that the T cell repertoire for this sequence does not exist or is functionally tolerant.

Figure 6.

Immunogenicity of Qa-1 (A) Immunogenicity of 59 peptides was determined by compiling the IFN-γ response of 25e T cell cultures, which were induced by immunization with irradiated TAP-negative EC7.1.Qa-1b.B7 cells. Responses were measured using a matrix-based approach in which each peptide was represented in two independent pools. T cell responses against each pool were scored from zero to three and compiled scores from the two pools were multiplied. (B–D) Percentage of IFN-γ–producing CD8+ T cells in the blood of mice that were naive (B) or immunized with the indicated peptide (C). Blood samples were taken and cells were stimulated overnight with medium or specific peptide, stained with antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Collected data from peptide-specific frequencies of CD8+ cells from mice are depicted in (D). Each data point represents one mouse, and data from two independent experiments is shown. (E–G) Cytotoxic reactivity in vivo in the same mice as shown in D. Specific killing was determined in naive (E) or immunized mice (F) by comparing the numbers of CFSEhigh targets, which were loaded with relevant peptides, to CFSElow targets, which were not loaded with peptide. CFSEintermediate targets were loaded with Qdm and were always comparable to targets without peptide. The means of percentage in vivo killing is depicted with standard deviations (G).

In conclusion, a broad repertoire of Qa-1b–binding peptide-epitopes of self origin emerges at the surface of cells with impairments in the antigen-processing pathway and that this novel repertoire replaces the TAP-dependent Qdm. These results underscore a role of Qa-1b in adaptive immunity and infer that T cell responses are evoked via this nonclassical MHC molecule to prevent outgrowth of processing-deficient cells in the body.

DISCUSSION

The nonclassical MHC class I molecule Qa-1b normally presents monomorphic Qdm peptides derived from the leader sequences of classical MHC. This Qdm peptide–MHC complex functions as a remote sensor of the class I processing pathway integrity through detection by CD94/NKG2A receptors on NK cells. Failure to present Qdm, caused by impairments in proteolysis, TAP, or other means, increases the susceptibility of cells to attack by these lymphocytes. We show that Qdm under such conditions is replaced by a surprisingly broad repertoire of alternative self-peptides. This novel peptide repertoire comprises neoantigens for which the T cell system is not hampered by immunological tolerance and can therefore induce a vigorous response of Qa-1b–restricted CD8+ CTL. This antigen presenting function of Qa-1b places this conserved MHC molecule at the intersection of innate and adaptive immunity. On one hand, it plays a role as a monomorphic inhibiting ligand when Qdm is presented, and, on the other hand, as a display system of an immunogenic self-peptide repertoire. Our data suggest that the immune system is equipped with multiple mechanisms to remove processing-deficient cells from the body.

The finding that Qa-1b is capable of presenting other peptides than Qdm is supported by previous work from several groups. The leader of the CMV protein UL40 was found to be presented, as well as peptides from Salmonella, Listeria, Epstein-Barr virus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Rodgers and Cook, 2005). Furthermore, an increase of Hsp60 in the cellular stress response was shown to result in replacement of the human Qdm homologue with the Hsp60 signal peptide (Michaëlsson et al., 2002). The unique feature, however, of the peptide repertoire we have elucidated in our current work is the fact that these peptides are derived from endogenous housekeeping proteins and only emerge in Qa-1b on the cell surface when the processing pathway is hampered. We demonstrated the display of these peptides in cells with partial and mild deficiencies that do not completely prevent Qdm from appearance, but a complete block in the processing pathway, e.g., loss of TAP1 or TAP2, resulted in the most efficient presentation of the novel peptides, demonstrating that TAP-independent processing mechanisms are responsible for the replacement of Qdm. Surprisingly, cell surface expression of Qa-1b is less affected by TAP deficiency than classical MHC class I molecules (Kambayashi et al., 2004), and HLA-E surface expression has also been described in the absence of functional TAP proteins or class I–derived signal peptides (Furukawa et al., 1999; Palmisano et al., 2005). Qa-1b and HLA-E, indeed, seem to efficiently egress from the ER in the absence of TAP (Robinson et al., 1998; LoMonaco et al., 2008). These data implicate that our mouse studies are relevant for the human setting. Two alternative processing routes have been described by which peptides can bypass the TAP transporter: N-terminal signal peptides, which are processed by signal peptide cleaving enzymes (Martoglio and Dobbertein, 1998) and C-terminal ends of ER-resident proteins, can also be loaded without TAP function, although the responsible proteolytic enzymes have not been identified for this pathway (Snyder et al., 1998). 40% of the 84 identified peptides in our search were indeed located at the N or C terminus. Interestingly, one of the most immunogenic Qa-1b peptide epitopes FAPLPRLPTL is encoded in the N-terminal signal sequence of a mitochondrial carrier protein (UniProt Q9CR21). The fact that 60% of the peptides cannot be explained by these two processing mechanisms suggests the existence of other yet uncharacterized processing pathways for MHC class I antigen presentation. It has been proposed that autophagy might contribute to MHC class I–restricted antigen presentation (Vyas et al., 2008). Autophagy is a crucial cellular mechanism responsible for the clearance of old or damaged cellular components, including organelles and macromolecules. This pathway might lead to the generation of peptides susceptible for MHC class I loading. Previous characterizations of peptides bound to classical MHC class I from TAP-deficient cells revealed similar features: predominance of signal peptides, increased peptide lengths, and selective presentation on TAP-negative variants (Suri et al., 2006; Weinzierl et al., 2008). The Qa-1b peptide repertoires present on TAP-positive versus TAP-negative cells were extremely different (Table II), in that the high-affinity binding monomorphic Qdm strongly dominated the TAP-positive pool for >95%, whereas a broad diversity of other peptides was present in the TAP-negative pool. Previous comparisons of peptide repertoires presented by classical MHC class I molecules showed much more overlap between the TAP-positive and -negative pools (Suri et al., 2006; Weinzierl et al., 2008). This indicates that the high-affinity binding Qdm competes with the TAP-independent peptides, and thereby prevents their presentation under normal circumstances. However, even mild or partial processing deficiencies in tumor cells already led to the presentation of both types of peptides, as illustrated by the fact that Qdm-specific CTL and our Qa-1b–restricted CTL were able to recognize the four colon tumors (Fig. 4). Importantly, Qdm is not immunogenic because of the widespread presentation in the normal host, including thymus (Sullivan et al., 2002), and thereby prevent tolerance mechanisms for CTL specificities that recognize the new emerging peptide-epitopes. We indeed found that T cells specific for these novel Qa-1b–peptides are deleted in mice that do present these peptides in Qa-1b molecules during T cell development, as in H-2Db−/−Kb−/− mice (Fig. S3).

Our Qa-1b–restricted T cells exhibit a normal phenotype for CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. S1) and use rearranged αβTCRs, and thereby distinguish themselves from reported Qa-1–recognizing intestinal γδ+ T cells (Davies et al., 2004) and the Qa-1–restricted regulatory CD8αα+ T cell subset (Tang et al., 2006). Target cell recognition was mediated by the TCR and this receptor did not cross-react with classical class I molecules, indicating that also, at the functional level, this subset is not different from conventional CD8+ T lymphocytes. This is in line with data from mice lacking classical MHC class I molecules arguing that ∼10% of the total CD8+ T cell subset is restricted by nonclassical molecules (Pérarnau et al., 1999; Seaman et al., 1999; Ureta-Vidal et al., 1999; Vugmeyster et al., 1998). This T cell repertoire is heterogeneous, as witnessed by a diverse usage of TCRVβ segments (Pérarnau et al., 1999; Ureta-Vidal et al., 1999). Selection of Qa-1b–restricted T cells in the thymus, indeed, does occur (Sullivan et al., 2002), but it remains puzzling how a monomorphic Qdm–Qa-1b complex can mediate positive selection resulting in such a broad repertoire. Furthermore, the relationship between the suppressive Qa-1b–restricted T cells (Jiang and Chess, 2000; Lu et al., 2006) and the tumor-reactive T cells described here remains elusive.

We speculate that comparable T cell subsets exist in human beings, especially because Qa-1b and HLA-E are rather conserved in structure and function (Rodgers and Cook, 2005). TCR-mediated recognition of HLA-E has been previously described (García et al., 2002; Heinzel et al., 2002; Romagnani et al., 2002), and it is highly likely that a subset similar to our Qa-1b-CTL, which responds against tumors with processing impairments, is present in humans. HLA-E surface expression is ubiquitous in the body and even detected in the absence of the human Qdm homologue (Furukawa et al., 1999; Palmisano et al., 2005), although MHC class I leaders strongly stimulate HLA-E display (Braud et al., 1998b; Lee et al., 1998). The lack of polymorphism in the human population infers that identified neoantigens presented in HLA-E constitute universal epitopes that might be exploited for the therapy of frequently occurring tumor immune escape variants and persistent infections by viruses encoding immune evasion proteins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell lines and mice.

The origin and culturing of most cell lines used in this study was described previously (van Hall et al., 2006). C4.4-25− is a β2m-deficient variant of EL4. RMA-S.B7-1 is a CD80 transfectant of RMA-S. EC7.1 is a Kb- and Db-negative variant of RMA-S (Howell et al., 2000). B78H1 is a TAP-deficient and MHC class I–deficient melanoma (Chiang et al., 2003). Tap1−/− and wild-type mouse embryo fibroblasts were immortalized by the adenovirus type 5 E1 gene (Ad5MEC, clone XC3). Tap1−/− fibrosarcoma was induced with MCA (clone MCB6TAP). Gene transfer of mouse TAP1, mouse TAP2, H-2Db, H-2Kb, and Qa-1b (T23 gene) was performed with retroviruses based on the MuLV vector LZRS. Generation of CTL clones was performed according to previous description (van Hall et al., 2006). In brief, syngeneic C57BL/6 mice were immunized with irradiated RMA-S.B7-1 cells and in vitro stimulated weekly with a mixture of RMA-S.B7-1 and EC7.1.Qa-1b.B7-1 cells, naive splenocytes, and IL-2. Qa-1b–restricted CTL clone B12i that is reactive with the TAP-dependent AMAPRTLLL peptide was isolated from a B6.Tla mouse (Cotterill et al., 1997).

All mice were purchased from Iffa-Credo and housed in the animal facility of the Leiden University Medical Center under specific pathogen–free conditions and used between 8 and 12 wk of age. TAP1-knockout mice were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories and MHC class I knockout animals were obtained from F. Lemonnier (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France; Pérarnau et al., 1999). Experiments were performed in accordance with Dutch national legislation and institutional guidelines and were approved by the animal ethical committee of the Leiden University Medical Center.

CTL assays and flow cytometry.

CTL activity was measured by chromium (51Cr) release assay or IFN-γ ELISA as previously described (van Hall et al., 2000). Data shown represent mean values obtained from triplicate test-wells, and the error bars represent standard deviation of these values. For antibody blocking, CTL were pretreated with 20 µg/ml antibodies, washed, and added as responders to target cells for IFN-γ release. The following antibodies were used in functional blocking assays: hamster anti-CD3 (Fab2 fragments of clone 145-2C11), control hamster anti-TNP, rat anti-CD4 (clone GK1.4), rat anti-CD8 (clone 2.43) anti-NKG2A/C (clone 20d5), and anti-Qa-1b (clone 6A8.6F10.1A6). For flow cytometry analysis, the following monoclonal antibodies were purchased from BD: Ly49AB6 (clone A1), Ly49C/I (clone 5E6), Ly49G (clone LGL-1), Qa-1b (clone 6A8.6F10.1A6), NKG2AB6 (clone 16a11), CD94 (clone 18d3), CD3 (clone 145-2C11), CD8α (clone Ly2), CD8β (clone Ly-3.2.), CD4 (clone GK1.4), CD16/CD32 (clone 2.4G2), NK1.1 (clone PK136), CD49b (clone DX5), and CD244 (clone 2B4). From eBioscience we purchased NKG2D (clone CX5).

Peptide elution, HPLC, and MS.

Peptides were eluted out of purified chimeric Qa-1b/Db molecules from EC7.1 cells. The genomic H-2Db construct in which the α 1 and α 2 domains were exchanged with those of Qa-1b was provided by P.J. Dyson (Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK; Cotterill et al., 1997). This genomic construct was expressed in HeLa cells, and cDNA was then cloned into the retroviral construct LZRS. EC7.1 cells transduced with this construct were twice sorted by FACS. TAP-positive counterparts were generated by retroviral gene transfer of the mouse TAP2 gene. Immunoprecipitation of Qa-1b/Db molecules was performed with protein A beads covalently coupled with anti-Db mAb 28–14-8S from two and four independent lysates of 40.109 TAP-positive and TAP-negative EC7.1 cells, respectively, as previously described (van Hall et al., 2000). The peptide pools were prefractionated on a C18 RP-HPLC system (200 µm × 15 cm; Reprosil-C18-AQ 3 µm; Dr. Maisch GmbH). Fractions were reduced to near dryness, diluted in 95/3/0.1 vol/vol/vol water/acetonitril/formic acid and subsequently analyzed by tandem MS. Peptides were analyzed by nanoflow liquid chromatography using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies), as previously described (van Hall et al., 2006), and coupled on line to a 7-tesla LTQ-FT mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron). The end of the nanocolumn was drawn to a tip (internal dimaeter [ID] ∼5 µm), from which the eluent was sprayed into the mass spectrometer. Peptides were trapped at 5 µl/min on a 1-cm column (100-µm ID; ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ, 3 µm) and eluted to a 15 cm column (50-µm ID; ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ, 3 µm) at 150 nl/min in a 60-min gradient from 0 to 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid.

The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS acquisition. Full scan MS spectra were acquired in the FT-ICR with a resolution of 25,000 at a target value of 3,000,000. The two most intense ions were then isolated for accurate mass measurements by a selected ion monitoring scan in FT-ICR with a resolution of 50,000 at a target accumulation value of 50,000. The selected ions were then fragmented in the linear ion trap using collision-induced dissociation at a target value of 10,000. In a post-analysis process, raw data were converted to peak lists using Bioworks Browser software, Version 3.1. For peptide/protein identification, MS/MS data were submitted to the mouse IPI database using Mascot Version 2.1 (Matrix Science) with the following settings: 5 ppm and 0.8-D deviation for precursor and fragment masses, respectively; no enzyme was specified. All peptides with a mascot ion score >30 were manually inspected. This resulted in an initial set of 150 peptides. These peptides were synthesized, and their MS/MS spectra compared with the MS/MS spectra of the Qa-1b–eluted peptides. This resulted in 84 confirmed peptide identifications.

Immunogenicity screen of Qa-1b presented peptides.

C57BL/6 mice were immunized twice with irradiated EC7.1.B7-1 cells with stable expression of Qa-1b. Spleens of immunized mice were cultured with the same cells for 1-2 wk, and reactivity of the cultures was tested against the EC7.1 cell panel to confirm Qa-1b restriction of the T cells. Reactivity against the identified peptides was assessed using a matrix-based system with pools of five different peptides and in which each peptide was represented in two independent pools. The peptide pools were loaded on spleen cells and IFN-γ production by T cells was measured with sandwich ELISA after 18 h. Reactivity against each pool was arbitrarily scored from zero to three, according to the mean background response. 25 independent cultures were assayed in this way, and the scores of each pool were compiled. The final immunogenicity score for each peptide was then obtained by multiplying the scores of two pools containing that particular peptide.

Peptide immunizations and in vivo cytotoxicity assay.

For peptide immunizations, C57BL/6 and H-2Db−/−Kb−/− mice were injected s.c. at the flank with 50 µg peptide mixed with 50 µg helper peptide from MuLV (H19; van Hall et al., 2006) in PBS on day 0 and 7. Immediately after injection, 60 mg Aldara cream (3M Pharmaceutical) containing 5% imiquimod was applied to the skin at the injection site. Mice received i.p. injections of 500,000 IU recombinant human IL-2 (Novartis) on the day of the second vaccination and on the day thereafter. T cell frequencies were determined from blood lymphocytes after 4 d and from spleens after 7 d with intracellular cytokine staining, as previously described (Bijker et al., 2007). In short, cells were cultured overnight with medium or 5 µg/ml of peptide and stained for CD8 and intracellular IFN-γ. Killing capacity of the peptide-induced T cells was determined in immunized animals using differentially CFSE-labeled and peptide-pulsed splenocytes, as described (Bijker et al., 2007). In brief, spleens from CD90.1 congenic C57BL/6 mice were passed through nylon wool and labeled with 5 µM CFSE and pulsed with indicated peptides, labeled with 0.5 µM CFSE and pulsed with control Qdm peptide, or labeled with 0.05 µM CFSE without peptide. These three target cell populations were washed, mixed, and 107 cells were injected i.v. per recipient mouse. The spleens of recipient mice were harvested after 2 d, stained with CD90.1-specific antibodies, and analyzed with flow cytometry. Percentage killing was calculated as the ratio between the numbers of peptide pulsed targets and control pulsed targets.

Online supplemental material.

Fig. S1 shows flow cytometry analysis of one representative Qa-1b–restricted CTL clone for several T cell lineage and NK cell surface markers. Fig. S2 depicts the T cell reactivity against a panel of EC7.1 cells (TAP- and MHC class I-negative; Howell et al., 2000) that were reconstituted with single constructs encoding H-2Db, -Kb, or -Qa-1b. In Fig. S3, the immunogenicity of Qa-1b–presented peptides in H-2Db−/−Kb−/− knockout mice is shown from blood lymphocytes of immunized mice. Lymphocytes incubated with PMA/ionomycin mitogens served as positive control. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20091429/DC1.