Literature DB >> 35837180

Prognostic value and clinicopathological correlation of the tumor regression grade in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Yi Wang1,2,3,4, Handong Xu1,2,3,4, Can Hu1,2,3,4, Pengcheng Yu1,2,3,4, Zhehan Bao1,2,3,4, Yanqiang Zhang2,3,4, Ruolan Zhang1,2,3,4, Shengjie Zhang2,3,4, Bing Li5, Jean-Marie Aerts6, Zhiyuan Xu2,3,4, Xiangdong Cheng2,3,4.   

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and radical gastrectomy are the gold standard treatments for resectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic value of the pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) of NACT remains controversial. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between the TRG after NACT and clinicopathological features as well as its prognostic value in advanced GC.
Methods: In total, 551 patients with GC who received NACT combined with surgical resection at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from April 2004 to December 2019 were included. The demographic characteristics, treatment response, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and survival data were reviewed from the medical records of all patients. The Chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between TRG and clinicopathological factors. Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis and Cox regression multivariate analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of GC patients.
Results: Among the 551 patients with advanced GC who accepted NACT treatment, 14 were determined to be in TRG 0, 98 in TRG 1, 257 in TRG 2, and 182 in TRG 3. Also, TRG was significantly correlated with the cT stage (P=0.015), ypT stage (P<0.001), ypN stage (P<0.001), ypTNM stage (P<0.001), vascular tumor thrombus (P<0.001), Borrmann classification (P=0.042), and lymph node ratio (LNR) (P<0.001). Furthermore, patients who had a good pathological response to NACT had a better prognosis, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 70.9% versus 48.8% in patients who had a poor pathological response. We also found that TRG (P=0.042, HR =1.65) was an independent prognostic factor affecting the OS of GC patients. Conclusions: TRG plays a significant role in the prognostic value in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients with higher cT stage, higher levels of pre-CA199 and pre-CA125 may have worse pathological response. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tumor regression grade (TRG); gastric cancer (GC); neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35837180      PMCID: PMC9274073          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  21 in total

Review 1.  Tumor regression grade and survival after neoadjuvant treatment in gastro-esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of 17 published studies.

Authors:  G Tomasello; F Petrelli; M Ghidini; E Pezzica; R Passalacqua; F Steccanella; L Turati; G Sgroi; S Barni
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial.

Authors:  Marc Ychou; Valérie Boige; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Thierry Conroy; Olivier Bouché; Gilles Lebreton; Muriel Ducourtieux; Laurent Bedenne; Jean-Michel Fabre; Bernard Saint-Aubert; Jean Genève; Philippe Lasser; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Tumor regression grade as a clinically useful outcome predictor in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Hee Cheol Kim; Seok Hyung Kim; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Hee Chul Park; Doo Ho Choi; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Tumor regression grade in gastric cancer: Predictors and impact on outcome.

Authors:  Aaron U Blackham; Erin Greenleaf; Maki Yamamoto; Chris Hollenbeak; Niraj Gusani; Domenico Coppola; Jose M Pimiento; Joyce Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Karen Becker; James D Mueller; Christoph Schulmacher; Katja Ott; Ulrich Fink; Raymonde Busch; Knut Böttcher; J Rüdiger Siewert; Heinz Höfler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Tumor Regression Grade in Gastric Cancer After Preoperative Therapy.

Authors:  Naruhiko Ikoma; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Mariela Blum Murphy; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Paul Mansfield; Jaffer A Ajani; Brian D Badgwell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Predicting pathological response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jesse Fischer; Tim W Eglinton; Simon Jg Richards; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  Prediction Model of Tumor Regression Grade for Advanced Gastric Cancer After Preoperative Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Qianchen Ma; Lingquan Wang; Changyu He; Sheng Lu; Zhentian Ni; Zichen Hua; Zhenglun Zhu; Zhongyin Yang; Yanan Zheng; Runhua Feng; Chao Yan; Chen Li; Xuexin Yao; Mingmin Chen; Wentao Liu; Min Yan; Zhenggang Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  [Grading of tumor regression of gastrointestinal carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy].

Authors:  Drolaiz Liu; Rupert Langer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.011

10.  Contemporary snapshot of tumor regression grade (TRG) distribution in locally advanced rectal cancer: a cross sectional multicentric experience.

Authors:  Paola Germani; Francesca Di Candido; Daniel Léonard; Dajana Cuicchi; Ugo Elmore; Marco Ettore Allaix; Vittoria Pia Barbieri; Laura D'Allens; Seraina Faes; Marika Milani; Damiano Caputo; Carmen Martinez; Jan Grosek; Valerio Caracino; Niki Christou; Sapho X Roodbeen; Umberto Bracale; Aurelia Wildeboer; Antonella Usai; Michele Benedetti; Alessandro Balani; Giuseppe Piccinni; Marco Catarci; Paolo Millo; Nicole Bouvy; Francesco Corcione; Roel Hompes; Frédéric Ris; Massimo Basti; Ales Tomazic; Eduardo Targarona; Alessandro Coppola; Andrea Pietrabissa; Dieter Hahnloser; Michel Adamina; Massimo Viola; Mario Morino; Riccardo Rosati; Gilberto Poggioli; Alex Kartheuser; Antonino Spinelli; Nicolò de Manzini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.