Literature DB >> 32542556

Tumor Regression Grade in Gastric Cancer After Preoperative Therapy.

Naruhiko Ikoma1, Jeannelyn S Estrella2, Mariela Blum Murphy3, Prajnan Das4, Bruce D Minsky4, Paul Mansfield5, Jaffer A Ajani3, Brian D Badgwell5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition, now includes post-neoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) staging for gastric cancer patients. Our purpose was to determine whether the tumor regression grade (TRG) of the primary tumor is useful for predicting the survival of these patients.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database and identified patients with clinically non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy before gastrectomy. Pathology reports were reviewed, and TRG was classified as follows: 0 (complete response), 1 (viable tumor cells ≤ 1-2%), 2 (viable cells ≤ 50%), or 3 (viable cells > 50%).
RESULTS: Of the 356 patients identified, including 80 (23%) with a gastroesophageal junction tumor, 268 (75%) had undergone preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Fifty-six (16%) had TRG 0, 57 (16%) TRG 1, 128 (36%) TRG 2, and 115 (32%) TRG 3. No association between TRG and pretreatment factors was identified, except for signet-ring cell histologic type and tumor location. A higher TRG was associated with more advanced ypT and ypN categories (both p < 0.001), ypM1 (p = 0.004), and R1 resection (p = 0.052). The median overall survival (OS) duration was 6.6 years, and the 5-year OS rate was 54.1%. TRG 3 was associated with a shorter OS duration than were other TRG scores (p = 0.015), while the OS did not differ significantly among the TRG 0-2 groups (p = 0.803). On multivariable analysis, TRG was not associated with OS after adjustment for ypN status.
CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer patients who underwent preoperative therapy, TRG 3 was associated with advanced ypStage and R1 resection. Patients with TRG 3 had a shorter OS duration because of associated advanced ypStage, particularly ypN+ status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AJCC; Chemoradiation therapy; Gastric cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy; Preoperative therapy; Tumor regression grade

Year:  2020        PMID: 32542556     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04688-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  15 in total

1.  Posttherapy nodal status, not graded histologic response, predicts survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazumasa Fujitani; Masayuki Mano; Motohiro Hirao; Yoshinori Kodama; Toshimasa Tsujinaka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The ypT category does not impact overall survival in node negative gastric cancer.

Authors:  Naruhiko Ikoma; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Keith F Fournier; Paul F Mansfield; Jaffer A Ajani; Brian D Badgwell
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  J S Macdonald; S R Smalley; J Benedetti; S A Hundahl; N C Estes; G N Stemmermann; D G Haller; J A Ajani; L L Gunderson; J M Jessup; J A Martenson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer.

Authors:  A M Lowy; P F Mansfield; S D Leach; R Pazdur; P Dumas; J A Ajani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Tumor regression grade in gastric cancer: Predictors and impact on outcome.

Authors:  Aaron U Blackham; Erin Greenleaf; Maki Yamamoto; Chris Hollenbeak; Niraj Gusani; Domenico Coppola; Jose M Pimiento; Joyce Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer?

Authors:  John C Mansour; Laura Tang; Manish Shah; David Bentrem; David S Klimstra; Mithat Gonen; David P Kelsen; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Nodal Downstaging in Gastric Cancer Patients: Promising Survival if ypN0 is Achieved.

Authors:  Naruhiko Ikoma; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Wayne Hofstetter; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Jaffer A Ajani; Keith F Fournier; Paul Mansfield; Brian D Badgwell
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; William H Allum; Sally P Stenning; Jeremy N Thompson; Cornelis J H Van de Velde; Marianne Nicolson; J Howard Scarffe; Fiona J Lofts; Stephen J Falk; Timothy J Iveson; David B Smith; Ruth E Langley; Monica Verma; Simon Weeden; Yu Jo Chua
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Tumor regression and survival after perioperative MAGIC-style chemotherapy in carcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Fernando Mingol; Javier Gallego; Albina Orduña; Amparo Martinez-Blasco; Javier Sola-Vera; Pedro Moya; Miguel Angel Morcillo; Juan Antonio Ruiz; Rafael Calpena; Francisco-Javier Lacueva
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Prognostic value of histopathological regression in 850 neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  T Schmidt; L Sicic; S Blank; K Becker; W Weichert; T Bruckner; T Parakonthun; R Langer; M W Büchler; J-R Siewert; F Lordick; K Ott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prognostic value and clinicopathological correlation of the tumor regression grade in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Handong Xu; Can Hu; Pengcheng Yu; Zhehan Bao; Yanqiang Zhang; Ruolan Zhang; Shengjie Zhang; Bing Li; Jean-Marie Aerts; Zhiyuan Xu; Xiangdong Cheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

2.  Development and Validation of a Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Signature to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Ying Peng; Xingyu Feng; Yan Zhao; Sharvesh Raj Seeruttun; Jun Zhang; Zixuan Cheng; Yong Li; Zaiyi Liu; Zhiwei Zhou
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02

3.  Comparison of tumor regression grading systems for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zi-Ning Liu; Yin-Kui Wang; Li Zhang; Yong-Ning Jia; Shan Fei; Xiang-Ji Ying; Yan Zhang; Shuang-Xi Li; Yu Sun; Zi-Yu Li; Jia-Fu Ji
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  Upregulation of CRABP2 by TET1-mediated DNA hydroxymethylation attenuates mitochondrial apoptosis and promotes oxaliplatin resistance in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaolong Tang; Yahang Liang; Guorui Sun; Qingsi He; Zhenyu Hou; Xingzhi Jiang; Peng Gao; Hui Qu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 9.685

5.  Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Modified by PET/CT: Results of Virtual Planning Study.

Authors:  Marek Slavik; Petr Burkon; Iveta Selingerova; Pavel Krupa; Tomas Kazda; Jaroslava Stankova; Tomas Nikl; Renata Hejnova; Zdenek Rehak; Pavel Osmera; Tomas Prochazka; Eva Dvorakova; Petr Pospisil; Peter Grell; Pavel Slampa; Radka Obermannova
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Surgery.

Authors:  Yonghe Chen; Dan Liu; Jian Xiao; Jun Xiang; Aihong Liu; Shi Chen; Junjie Liu; Xiansheng Hu; Junsheng Peng
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.