Literature DB >> 33356679

Predicting pathological response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Jesse Fischer1,2, Tim W Eglinton1,3, Simon Jg Richards1,4, Frank A Frizelle1,3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Pathological complete response (pCR) rates of approximately 20% following neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer have given rise to non-operative or watch-and-wait (W&W) management. To improve outcomes there has been significant research into predictors of response. The goal is to optimize selection for W&W, avoid chemoradiotherapy in those who won't benefit and improve treatment to maximize the clinical complete response (cCR) rate and the number of patients who can be considered for W&W.Areas covered: A systematic review of articles published 2008-2018 and indexed in PubMed, Embase or Medline was performed to identify predictors of pathological response (including pCR and recognized tumor regression grades) to fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy in patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Evidence for clinical, biomarker and radiological predictors is discussed as well as potential future directions.Expert opinion: Our current ability to predict the response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is very limited. cCR of 40% has been achieved with total neoadjuvant therapy. If neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer continues to improve it is possible that the treatment for rectal cancer may eventually parallel that of anal squamous cell carcinoma, with surgery reserved for the minority of patients who don't respond to chemoradiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal cancer; chemoradiotherapy; pathological complete response; pathological response; predictors of treatment response; radiotherapy; watch-and-wait

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33356679     DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1868992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther        ISSN: 1473-7140            Impact factor:   4.512


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic value and clinicopathological correlation of the tumor regression grade in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Handong Xu; Can Hu; Pengcheng Yu; Zhehan Bao; Yanqiang Zhang; Ruolan Zhang; Shengjie Zhang; Bing Li; Jean-Marie Aerts; Zhiyuan Xu; Xiangdong Cheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

2.  Comparison of tumor regression grade and clinical stage based on MRI image as a selection criterion for non-radical management after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  In Jun Yang; Jung Wook Suh; Jeehye Lee; Hong-Min Ahn; Heung-Kwon Oh; Duck-Woo Kim; Min Jung Kim; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Joo Park; Dong Woon Lee; Sung-Chan Park; Hyung Chul Park; Jae Hwan Oh; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Pre-Treatment Computed Tomography Radiomics for Predicting the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yitao Mao; Qian Pei; Yan Fu; Haipeng Liu; Changyong Chen; Haiping Li; Guanghui Gong; Hongling Yin; Peipei Pang; Huashan Lin; Biaoxiang Xu; Hongyan Zai; Xiaoping Yi; Bihong T Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  The immune microenvironment landscape shows treatment-specific differences in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Cristina Graham Martínez; Yari Barella; Sonay Kus Öztürk; Marleen Ansems; Mark A J Gorris; Shannon van Vliet; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 8.786

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.