Literature DB >> 35834569

Neural dynamics differentially encode phrases and sentences during spoken language comprehension.

Fan Bai1,2, Antje S Meyer1,2, Andrea E Martin1,2.   

Abstract

Human language stands out in the natural world as a biological signal that uses a structured system to combine the meanings of small linguistic units (e.g., words) into larger constituents (e.g., phrases and sentences). However, the physical dynamics of speech (or sign) do not stand in a one-to-one relationship with the meanings listeners perceive. Instead, listeners infer meaning based on their knowledge of the language. The neural readouts of the perceptual and cognitive processes underlying these inferences are still poorly understood. In the present study, we used scalp electroencephalography (EEG) to compare the neural response to phrases (e.g., the red vase) and sentences (e.g., the vase is red), which were close in semantic meaning and had been synthesized to be physically indistinguishable. Differences in structure were well captured in the reorganization of neural phase responses in delta (approximately <2 Hz) and theta bands (approximately 2 to 7 Hz),and in power and power connectivity changes in the alpha band (approximately 7.5 to 13.5 Hz). Consistent with predictions from a computational model, sentences showed more power, more power connectivity, and more phase synchronization than phrases did. Theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling occurred, but did not differ between the syntactic structures. Spectral-temporal response function (STRF) modeling revealed different encoding states for phrases and sentences, over and above the acoustically driven neural response. Our findings provide a comprehensive description of how the brain encodes and separates linguistic structures in the dynamics of neural responses. They imply that phase synchronization and strength of connectivity are readouts for the constituent structure of language. The results provide a novel basis for future neurophysiological research on linguistic structure representation in the brain, and, together with our simulations, support time-based binding as a mechanism of structure encoding in neural dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35834569      PMCID: PMC9282610          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   9.593


  106 in total

1.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005.

Authors:  Alois Schlögl; Felix Lee; Horst Bischof; Gert Pfurtscheller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  A D Patel; E Gibson; J Ratner; M Besson; P J Holcomb
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A cross-linguistic study of speech modulation spectra.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Maria Clemencia Ortiz-Barajas; Ramón Guevara Erra; Judit Gervain; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing.

Authors:  Keith B Doelling; Luc H Arnal; Oded Ghitza; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  What works in auditory working memory? A neural oscillations perspective.

Authors:  Anna Wilsch; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-06

10.  Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals.

Authors:  Irene Winkler; Stefan Haufe; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.