| Literature DB >> 35831802 |
Ping Qin1,2, Jing Ye1,2, Xinbao Gong1,2, Xu Yan1,2, Maosen Lin1,2, Tao Lin1,2, Tong Liu1,2, Hailing Li1,2, Xiujuan Wang3, Yanyun Zhu1, Xiaoqian Li1, Ya Liu1,2, Yunsheng Li1,2, Yinghui Ling2, Xiaorong Zhang1,2, Fugui Fang4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Changes in the abundance of ovarian proteins play a key role in the regulation of reproduction. However, to date, no studies have investigated such changes in pubescent goats. Herein we applied isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to analyze the expression levels of ovarian proteins in pre-pubertal (n = 3) and pubertal (n = 3) goats.Entities:
Keywords: Anhui white goats; Differentially abundant proteins; LC–MS/MS; PPI network; Proteomics; Pubertal onset; iTRAQ
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35831802 PMCID: PMC9281040 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08699-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Fig. 1Experimental design and workflow to identify differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in pre-pubertal (n = 3) and pubertal (n = 3) goat ovaries
Fig. 2DAP screening. a Volcano map. Red and green dots indicate up- and downregulation of protein expression levels, respectively. Gray dots indicate DAPs with insignificant changes in expression. b Number of DAPs. In total, 301 DAPs were identified. Orange and green columns represent the number of up- (n = 176) and downregulated (n = 125) proteins, respectively
Top 15 upregulated proteins in pubertal compared to pre-pubertal goat ovaries
| Accession | Gene Name | Description | Coverage [%] | Unique Peptides | Mean_Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q6BCN2 | Cahi-DQA1 | MHC class II antigen (Fragment) | 0.207 | 1 | 0.0010 | 6.3115 |
| A0A068B4V9 | GSTA3 | Glutathione S-transferase | 0.414 | 1 | 0.0034 | 5.8213 |
| A0A452F8N3 | TET3 | Methylcytosine dioxygenase TET | 0.018 | 1 | 0.0050 | 5.6453 |
| A0A452FL66 | Ig-like domain-containing protein | 0.155 | 2 | 0.0189 | 5.6192 | |
| A0A452F0V7 | USP42 | USP domain-containing protein | 0.006 | 1 | 0.0049 | 5.4207 |
| A0A452FRG5 | LMNTD2 | LTD domain-containing protein | 0.021 | 1 | 0.0081 | 5.3130 |
| P0CH26 | HBAII | II alpha globin | 0.627 | 1 | 0.0086 | 5.2103 |
| A0A452EDD0 | NR5A2 | Uncharacterized protein | 0.018 | 1 | 0.0440 | 4.8056 |
| A0A452DRV6 | ZNF529 | Uncharacterized protein | 0.014 | 1 | 0.0022 | 4.7709 |
| I6TE27 | KIAA1239 (Fragment) | 0.017 | 1 | 0.0027 | 4.7686 | |
| A0A452F5F2 | SERPINI2 | SERPIN domain-containing protein | 0.044 | 1 | 0.0145 | 4.7063 |
| A0A452DS42 | IGv domain-containing protein | 0.065 | 1 | 0.0003 | 4.4793 | |
| A0A452EDE4 | KMT2C | [Histone H3]-lysine (4) N-trimethyltransferase | 0.002 | 1 | 0.0009 | 4.2239 |
| A0A452FX60 | LOC102185917 | Ig-like domain-containing protein | 0.147 | 1 | 0.0234 | 3.8227 |
| A0A452FZ42 | CCNE1 | Cyclin N-terminal domain-containing protein | 0.019 | 1 | 0.0081 | 3.7908 |
Top 15 downregulated proteins in pubertal compared to pre-pubertal goat ovaries
| Accession | Gene Name | Description | Coverage [%] | Unique Peptides | Mean_Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A0A452GA12 | C11orf16 | DUF4537 domain-containing protein | 0.015 | 1 | 0.0006 | 0.3087 |
| A0A452FKP1 | EFCAB6 | Uncharacterized protein | 0.004 | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.3770 |
| A0A452E9S9 | CNMD | BRICHOS domain-containing protein | 0.015 | 1 | 0.0030 | 0.3841 |
| P02082 | Hemoglobin fetal subunit beta | 0.855 | 10 | 0.0032 | 0.4100 | |
| A0A452FUY5 | PER2 | Uncharacterized protein | 0.006 | 1 | 0.0027 | 0.4138 |
| A0A452E681 | ZP2 | ZP domain-containing protein | 0.049 | 4 | 0.0002 | 0.4267 |
| A0A452G903 | Metallothionein | 0.328 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.4319 | |
| A0A452FKU4 | ZP3 | Zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 3 | 0.229 | 9 | 0.0007 | 0.4391 |
| A0A452FFM6 | G_PROTEIN_RECEP_F1_2 domain-containing protein | 0.025 | 1 | 0.0002 | 0.4455 | |
| A0A452DYI9 | FLYWCH family member 2 | 0.052 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.4803 | |
| A0A452FEE2 | Ig-like domain-containing protein | 0.215 | 2 | 0.0022 | 0.4892 | |
| A0A452G9F8 | Uncharacterized protein | 0.189 | 3 | 0.0003 | 0.4930 | |
| A0A452EAM2 | Uncharacterized protein | 0.037 | 1 | 0.0095 | 0.4947 | |
| A0A452FCF1 | LOC108635821 | AIG1-type G domain-containing protein | 0.196 | 2 | 0.0026 | 0.4983 |
| A0A0H4PMF2 | Esco2 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.0096 | 0.5003 |
Fig. 3iTRAQ–LC–MS/MS data validation by Western blotting (WB). a Abundance of three upregulated [IGF-1 (full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 5), RCAN1 (full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 6), and DHCR24 (full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 7)] and two downregulated [CDK1 (full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 8) and STMN1 (full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 9)] proteins were analyzed by WB. β-Tubulin (full-length blots/gels are presented in Additional file 8) served as the internal reference. (Some positions of marker were in the middle and some were on the edge of the gels. To display the images more aesthetically, we have cropped them.) b Quantitative results for proteins. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3/group). Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s t-test; P < 0.05
Fig. 4Cluster heatmap showing expression intensity of DAPs. Euclidean distance and hierarchical clustering were used to cluster protein expression patterns. Colors represent relative expression levels of proteins in the ovaries of pre- and pubertal goats, with red and blue representing up- and downregulation, respectively
Fig. 5Gene ontology functional analysis of DAPs. P < 0.05
Fig. 6Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis of DAPs. The larger the bubble, the more the number of DAPs. Bubble color indicates the P value; the smaller the P value, the higher the level of significance
Fig. 7Protein–protein interaction network analysis