Literature DB >> 6877784

Evoked potential and preferential looking estimates of visual acuity in pediatric patients.

S Sokol, V C Hansen, A Moskowitz, P Greenfield, V L Towle.   

Abstract

Pattern visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and behavioral visual acuity measured with forced-choice preferential looking techniques (FPL) were obtained from 172 pediatric patients between the ages of 4 months and 10 years. More children younger than 2 years of age successfully completed monocular testing by pattern VEP than by FPL methods. For children older than 2 years, we were equally successful in completing each of the two tests. Of those children who completed both tests, the VEP results agreed with Snellen, Allen, and "E" acuity measures more often (66%) than did the FPL results (50%). Both tests were more sensitive than Allen single characters in detecting interocular acuity differences in children younger than 3 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6877784     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34524-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of objective visual acuity in amblyopic children.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Fatih M Mutlu; H Ibrahim Altinsoy; Ahmet Tas; Oguzhan Oz; Gungor Sobaci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Alteration of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis.

Authors:  L N Johnson; R D Yee; R S Hepler; D A Martin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Pattern VEP is a useful technique in monitoring the effectiveness of occlusion therapy in amblyopic eyes under occlusion therapy.

Authors:  Ayse Oner; Mesut Coskun; Cem Evereklioglu; Hakki Dogan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Vision in albinism.

Authors:  C G Summers
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1996

Review 5.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Association of Optic Radiation Integrity with Cortical Thickness in Children with Anisometropic Amblyopia.

Authors:  Shun Qi; Yun-Feng Mu; Long-Biao Cui; Rong Li; Mei Shi; Ying Liu; Jun-Qing Xu; Jian Zhang; Jian Yang; Hong Yin
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Paradoxical robust visual evoked potentials in young patients with cortical blindness.

Authors:  Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe; Carole M Panton; J Raymond Buncic; Carol A Westall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Effect of refractive error on visual evoked potentials with pattern stimulation in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Ito; Seiya Maehara; Yoshiki Itoh; Ai Matsui; Miri Hayashi; Akira Kubo; Tsuyoshi Uchide
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 9.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.