H G van der Poel1, W de Blok. 1. Department Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.vd.poel@nki.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test a simple intraoperative scoring system for the circumferential extent of fascia preservation (FP) for the prediction of postoperative erectile function. With the advent of robotic and endoscopic surgery for prostate cancer, more extensive FP has emerged as a method to improve postoperative erectile function. METHODS: A total of 107 consecutive cases with normal preoperative erectile function were treated using robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The erectile, sexual, and global quality of life outcomes using the European Organization for Research and Treatment and Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire-C30 and prostate cancer-specific 25-item questionnaire were assessed at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, 57 men (53%) reported no or minimal effects on erectile function with or without the use of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. The patient age at surgery, prostate size, and FP score were associated with erectile function at 6 months postoperatively. The mean FP score was 9.2 +/- 2.8 and 4.7 +/- 2.4 for patients without and with erectile dysfunction postoperatively, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the FP score and patient age at surgery were the best predictors of postoperative erectile function. No correlation between the FP score and positive surgical resection margin rate was observed. A greater FP score predicted for greater questionnaire-based libido, sexual activity, and sexual function scores. CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system for the extent of circumferential FP during prostatectomy is a stronger predictor of postoperative erectile function recovery than is laterality (bilateral or unilateral) or fascial depth (interfascial or intrafascial). More ventral FP significantly contributed to postoperative erectile function recovery.
OBJECTIVES: To test a simple intraoperative scoring system for the circumferential extent of fascia preservation (FP) for the prediction of postoperative erectile function. With the advent of robotic and endoscopic surgery for prostate cancer, more extensive FP has emerged as a method to improve postoperative erectile function. METHODS: A total of 107 consecutive cases with normal preoperative erectile function were treated using robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The erectile, sexual, and global quality of life outcomes using the European Organization for Research and Treatment and Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire-C30 and prostate cancer-specific 25-item questionnaire were assessed at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, 57 men (53%) reported no or minimal effects on erectile function with or without the use of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. The patient age at surgery, prostate size, and FP score were associated with erectile function at 6 months postoperatively. The mean FP score was 9.2 +/- 2.8 and 4.7 +/- 2.4 for patients without and with erectile dysfunction postoperatively, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the FP score and patient age at surgery were the best predictors of postoperative erectile function. No correlation between the FP score and positive surgical resection margin rate was observed. A greater FP score predicted for greater questionnaire-based libido, sexual activity, and sexual function scores. CONCLUSIONS: A scoring system for the extent of circumferential FP during prostatectomy is a stronger predictor of postoperative erectile function recovery than is laterality (bilateral or unilateral) or fascial depth (interfascial or intrafascial). More ventral FP significantly contributed to postoperative erectile function recovery.
Authors: Udo Nagele; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ute Walcher; Andre P Nicklas; Axel S Merseburger; Thomas R W Herrmann Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Hans Veerman; Thierry N Boellaard; Jari A van der Eijk; Judith H Sluijter; Ton A Roeleveld; Tim M van der Sluis; Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen; Esther Wit; Maarten J A van Alphen; Robert L P van Veen; André N Vis; Henk G van der Poel; Pim J van Leeuwen Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2022-07-12
Authors: Nikolaos Grivas; Rosanne C van der Roest; Clarize M de Korne; Gijs H KleinJan; Karolina Sikorska; Ivo G Schoots; Corinne Tillier; Bram van der Broek; Kees Jalink; Stijn W T J P Heijmink; Tessa Buckle; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Henk G van der Poel Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ji Sung Shim; Jong Hyun Tae; Tae Il Noh; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Vipul R Patel; Sung Gu Kang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Marinus J Hagens; H Veerman; K M de Ligt; C N Tillier; P J van Leeuwen; R J A van Moorselaar; H G van der Poel Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2021-06-12
Authors: Andrea Salonia; Giulia Castagna; Paolo Capogrosso; Fabio Castiglione; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2015-08