Literature DB >> 35819587

Characterizing Interoceptive Differences in Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Case-control Studies.

Evan Suzman1, Zachary J Williams2,3,4,5,6, Samantha L Bordman7, Jennifer E Markfeld8, Sophia M Kaiser9, Kacie A Dunham8,10, Alisa R Zoltowski10, Michelle D Failla11, Carissa J Cascio10,12,13,14, Tiffany G Woynaroski8,10,12,13.   

Abstract

Interoception, the body's perception of its own internal states, is thought to be altered in autism, though results of empirical studies have been inconsistent. The current study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the extant literature comparing interoceptive outcomes between autistic (AUT) and neurotypical (NT) individuals, determining which domains of interoception demonstrate robust between-group differences. A three-level Bayesian meta-analysis compared heartbeat counting performance, heartbeat discrimination performance, heartbeat counting confidence ratings, and self-reported interoceptive attention between AUT and NT groups (15 studies; nAUT = 467, nNT = 478). Autistic participants showed significantly reduced heartbeat counting performance [g = - 0.333, CrI95% (- 0.535, - 0.138)] and higher confidence in their heartbeat counting abilities [g = 0.430, CrI95% (0.123, 0.750)], but groups were equivalent on other meta-analyzed outcomes. Implications for future interoception research in autism are discussed.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Attention; Autism; Interoception; Meta-analysis; Sensory

Year:  2022        PMID: 35819587     DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05656-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord        ISSN: 0162-3257


  69 in total

Review 1.  Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.

Authors:  W L Baker; C Michael White; J C Cappelleri; J Kluger; C I Coleman
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Diseases, Disorders, and Comorbidities of Interoception.

Authors:  Bruno Bonaz; Richard D Lane; Michael L Oshinsky; Paul J Kenny; Rajita Sinha; Emeran A Mayer; Hugo D Critchley
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Convergence of interoception, emotion, and social cognition: A twofold fMRI meta-analysis and lesion approach.

Authors:  Federico Adolfi; Blas Couto; Fabian Richter; Jean Decety; Jessica Lopez; Mariano Sigman; Facundo Manes; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 4.  The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self.

Authors:  Wen G Chen; Dana Schloesser; Angela M Arensdorf; Janine M Simmons; Changhai Cui; Rita Valentino; James W Gnadt; Lisbeth Nielsen; Coryse St Hillaire-Clarke; Victoria Spruance; Todd S Horowitz; Yolanda F Vallejo; Helene M Langevin
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Update of a Meta-analysis of Sensory Symptoms in ASD: A New Decade of Research.

Authors:  Ayelet Ben-Sasson; Eynat Gal; Ronen Fluss; Neta Katz-Zetler; Sharon A Cermak
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-12

6.  The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire: Evaluating Aspects of Self-Reported Interoception in Patients With Persistent Somatic Symptoms, Stress-Related Syndromes, and Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Katleen Bogaerts; Marta Walentynowicz; Maaike Van Den Houte; Elena Constantinou; Omer Van den Bergh
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2022 Feb-Mar 01       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Ayelet Ben-Sasson; Liat Hen; Ronen Fluss; Sharon A Cermak; Batya Engel-Yeger; Eynat Gal
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-05-30

8.  Assessing body awareness and autonomic reactivity: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF).

Authors:  Ana Cabrera; Jacek Kolacz; Guillem Pailhez; Andrea Bulbena-Cabre; Antonio Bulbena; Stephen W Porges
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Alexithymia: a general deficit of interoception.

Authors:  Rebecca Brewer; Richard Cook; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis with Non-Independent Effect Sizes.

Authors:  Mike W-L Cheung
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 7.444

View more
  1 in total

1.  Acute physical-activity related increases in interoceptive ability are not enhanced with simultaneous interoceptive attention.

Authors:  A Wallman-Jones; E R Palser; V Benzing; M Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.