Literature DB >> 34840287

The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire: Evaluating Aspects of Self-Reported Interoception in Patients With Persistent Somatic Symptoms, Stress-Related Syndromes, and Healthy Controls.

Katleen Bogaerts1, Marta Walentynowicz, Maaike Van Den Houte, Elena Constantinou, Omer Van den Bergh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ), a 17-item self-report measure assessing sensitivity and attention to interoceptive signals.
METHODS: In study 1, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed in a student convenience sample (n = 1868). In study 2, ISAQ data of a healthy sample (n = 144) and various patient groups experiencing stress-related syndromes (overstrain, n = 63; burnout, n = 37; panic disorder [PD]. n = 60) and/or persistent somatic symptoms in daily life (irritable bowel syndrome, n = 38; fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome, n = 151; medically unexplained dyspnea [MUD], n = 29) were compared.
RESULTS: Three subscales were revealed: (F1) sensitivity to neutral bodily sensations, (F2) attention to unpleasant bodily sensations, and (F3) difficulty disengaging from unpleasant bodily sensations. Overall, patients with fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome and patients with MUD scored significantly higher on F1 (p = .009 and p = .027, respectively) and F2 (p = .002 and p < .001, respectively) than healthy controls. Patients with PD had higher scores on subscales F2 (p < .001) and F3 (p < .001) compared with healthy controls, as well as higher scores on F2 compared with all other patient groups (pPD versus MUD = .008; all other p values < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Interoceptive sensibility-the self-reported aspect of interoception-is not a homogeneous or unitary construct. The subscales of the ISAQ differentiate healthy controls from patients with persistent somatic and/or stress-related complaints in daily life and distinguish different patient groups. The ISAQ can be used as a concise, reliable, and clinically relevant research tool to further disentangle adaptive and maladaptive aspects of interoceptive ability.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Psychosomatic Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34840287     DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  3 in total

1.  Characterizing Interoceptive Differences in Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Case-control Studies.

Authors:  Evan Suzman; Zachary J Williams; Samantha L Bordman; Jennifer E Markfeld; Sophia M Kaiser; Kacie A Dunham; Alisa R Zoltowski; Michelle D Failla; Carissa J Cascio; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-07-11

2.  Questionnaires of interoception do not assess the same construct.

Authors:  Luca Vig; Ferenc Köteles; Eszter Ferentzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Construct Validity of the Sensory Profile Interoception Scale: Measuring Sensory Processing in Everyday Life.

Authors:  Winnie Dunn; Catana Brown; Angela Breitmeyer; Ashley Salwei
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.