BACKGROUND: Meta-regression has grown in popularity in recent years, paralleling the increasing numbers of systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in the biomedical literature. However, many clinicians and decision-makers may be unfamiliar with the underlying principles and assumptions made within meta-regression leading to incorrect interpretation of their results. AIMS: This paper reviews the appropriate use and interpretation of meta-regression in the medical literature, including cautions and caveats to its use. MATERIALS & METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE (OVID) from 1966-February 2009 was conducted to identify literature relevant to the topic of heterogeneity and/or meta-regression in systematic reviews and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Meta-analysis, a statistical method of pooling data from studies included in a systematic review, is often compromised by heterogeneity of its results. This could include clinical, methodological or statistical heterogeneity. Meta-regression, said to be a merging of meta-analytic and linear regression principles, is a more sophisticated tool for exploring heterogeneity. It aims to discern whether a linear relationship exists between an outcome measure and on or more covariates. The associations found in a meta-regression should be considered hypothesis generating and not regarded as proof of causality. CONCLUSIONS: The current review will enable clinicians and healthcare decision-makers to appropriately interpret the results of meta-regression when used within the constructs of a systematic review, and be able to extend it to their clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Meta-regression has grown in popularity in recent years, paralleling the increasing numbers of systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in the biomedical literature. However, many clinicians and decision-makers may be unfamiliar with the underlying principles and assumptions made within meta-regression leading to incorrect interpretation of their results. AIMS: This paper reviews the appropriate use and interpretation of meta-regression in the medical literature, including cautions and caveats to its use. MATERIALS & METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE (OVID) from 1966-February 2009 was conducted to identify literature relevant to the topic of heterogeneity and/or meta-regression in systematic reviews and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Meta-analysis, a statistical method of pooling data from studies included in a systematic review, is often compromised by heterogeneity of its results. This could include clinical, methodological or statistical heterogeneity. Meta-regression, said to be a merging of meta-analytic and linear regression principles, is a more sophisticated tool for exploring heterogeneity. It aims to discern whether a linear relationship exists between an outcome measure and on or more covariates. The associations found in a meta-regression should be considered hypothesis generating and not regarded as proof of causality. CONCLUSIONS: The current review will enable clinicians and healthcare decision-makers to appropriately interpret the results of meta-regression when used within the constructs of a systematic review, and be able to extend it to their clinical practice.
Authors: Raye Z Litten; I-Jen P Castle; Daniel Falk; Megan Ryan; Joanne Fertig; Chiung M Chen; Hsiao-ye Yi Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: M Chakhtoura; E A Akl; S El Ghandour; K Shawwa; A Arabi; Z Mahfoud; R H Habib; H Hoballah; G El Hajj Fuleihan Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Francis Bessière; Safia Khenifer; Julie Dubourg; Isabelle Durieu; Jean-Christophe Lega Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 17.440