| Literature DB >> 35817971 |
Xiaoxiao Ma1,2, Nadeem Riaz3, Robert M Samstein4,5, Mark Lee6, Vladimir Makarov1,2, Cristina Valero6, Diego Chowell5,7,8, Fengshen Kuo9, Douglas Hoen1,2, Conall W R Fitzgerald6, Hui Jiang9,10, Jonathan Alektiar10, Tyler J Alban1,2, Ivan Juric1, Prerana Bangalore Parthasarathy1, Yu Zhao1, Erich Y Sabio10, Richa Verma1,2, Raghvendra M Srivastava1,2, Lynda Vuong9,10, Wei Yang10, Xiao Zhang1,2, Jingming Wang6, Lawrence K Chu1,11, Stephen L Wang1,12, Daniel W Kelly13, Xin Pei3, Jiapeng Chen3, Rona Yaeger14, Dmitriy Zamarin15, Ahmet Zehir16, Mithat Gönen17, Luc G T Morris6, Timothy A Chan18,19,20,21,22.
Abstract
Defects in pathways governing genomic fidelity have been linked to improved response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICB). Pathogenic POLE/POLD1 mutations can cause hypermutation, yet how diverse mutations in POLE/POLD1 influence antitumor immunity following ICB is unclear. Here, we comprehensively determined the effect of POLE/POLD1 mutations in ICB and elucidated the mechanistic impact of these mutations on tumor immunity. Murine syngeneic tumors harboring Pole/Pold1 functional mutations displayed enhanced antitumor immunity and were sensitive to ICB. Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutated tumors harboring telltale mutational signatures respond better to ICB than patients harboring wild-type or signature-negative tumors. A mutant POLE/D1 function-associated signature-based model outperformed several traditional approaches for identifying POLE/POLD1 mutated patients that benefit from ICB. Strikingly, the spectrum of mutational signatures correlates with the biochemical features of neoantigens. Alterations that cause POLE/POLD1 function-associated signatures generate T cell receptor (TCR)-contact residues with increased hydrophobicity, potentially facilitating T cell recognition. Altogether, the functional landscapes of POLE/POLD1 mutations shape immunotherapy efficacy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35817971 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01108-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Genet ISSN: 1061-4036 Impact factor: 41.307