Literature DB >> 12558356

Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis.

John M Inadomi1, Richard Sampliner, Jesper Lagergren, David Lieberman, A Mark Fendrick, Nimish Vakil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Once-in-a-lifetime screening for Barrett esophagus has been proposed for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but there is little evidence of its cost-effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: 1) To determine the cost-effectiveness of screening high-risk groups for Barrett esophagus and providing surveillance to patients with Barrett esophagus and dysplasia or to all patients with Barrett esophagus and 2) to compare the results with the cost-effectiveness of no screening or surveillance.
DESIGN: A decision analytic model was developed to examine no screening or surveillance and screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus with dysplasia only or Barrett esophagus without dysplasia every 2 to 5 years. Low- or high-grade dysplasia received surveillance every 6 or 3 months, respectively. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and the Health Care Financing Administration. TARGET POPULATION: 50-year-old white men with symptoms of GERD. TIME HORIZON: 50 years of age until 80 years of age or death. PERSPECTIVE: Third-party payer. OUTCOME MEASURE: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Screening with surveillance limited to patients with Barrett esophagus with dysplasia required $10 440 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved compared to no screening or surveillance. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of surveillance every 5 years in patients with Barrett esophagus without dysplasia compared to surveillance of patients with Barrett esophagus with dysplasia was $596 000 per QALY saved. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The annual incidence of adenocarcinoma must exceed 1 case per 54 patient-years of follow-up (1.9%) for surveillance of Barrett esophagus without dysplasia every 5 years to yield an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio less than $50 000 per QALY saved.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening 50-year-old men with symptoms of GERD to detect adenocarcinoma associated with Barrett esophagus is probably cost-effective. However, subsequent surveillance of patients with Barrett esophagus but no dysplasia, even at 5-year intervals, is an expensive practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558356     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  90 in total

1.  Managing Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

Review 2.  Angle-resolved low-coherence interferometry: an optical biopsy technique for clinical detection of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Yizheng Zhu; Neil G Terry; Adam Wax
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 3.  Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: focus on current treatment options.

Authors:  Leonidas Lekakos; Nikolaos P Karidis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Christos Tsigris; Gregory Kouraklis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: current issues and future directions.

Authors:  Sung E Choi; Chin Hur
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.287

6.  The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Chin Hur; Sung Eun Choi; Joel H Rubenstein; Chung Yin Kong; Norman S Nishioka; Dawn T Provenzale; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Barrett's esophagus and the increasing role of endoluminal therapy.

Authors:  Michael S Smith; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.409

8.  Modeling the cost-effectiveness of strategies for treating esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; Nicholas G Hirst; George C Mayne; David I Watson; Timothy Bright; Wang Cai; Andrew P Barbour; Bernard M Smithers; David C Whiteman; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Risk of metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective study in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Ryu Ishihara; Tsuneo Oyama; Seiichiro Abe; Hiroaki Takahashi; Hiroyuki Ono; Junko Fujisaki; Mitsuru Kaise; Kenichi Goda; Kenro Kawada; Tomoyuki Koike; Manabu Takeuchi; Rie Matsuda; Dai Hirasawa; Masayoshi Yamada; Junichi Kodaira; Masaki Tanaka; Masami Omae; Akira Matsui; Takashi Kanesaka; Akiko Takahashi; Shinichi Hirooka; Masahiro Saito; Yosuke Tsuji; Yuki Maeda; Hiroharu Yamashita; Ichiro Oda; Yasuhiko Tomita; Takashi Matsunaga; Shuji Terai; Soji Ozawa; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Long-term follow-up after complete ablation of Barrett's esophagus with argon plasma coagulation.

Authors:  Ahmed Madisch; Stephan Miehlke; Ekkehard Bayerdorffer; Birgit Wiedemann; David Antos; Anke Sievert; Michael Vieth; Manfred Stolte; Heinrich Schulz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.