Literature DB >> 30044236

Safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive cell sampling device ('Cytosponge') in the diagnosis of esophageal pathology: a systematic review.

Umair Iqbal1, Osama Siddique2, Anais Ovalle2, Hafsa Anwar3, Steven F Moss2,4.   

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is an increasingly common cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Most cases are considered the consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, with subsequent Barrett's metaplasia and dysplasia. Because progression from Barrett's metaplasia to cancer occurs over many years, endoscopic screening and surveillance programs have been established, albeit with little or no consideration for cost-effectiveness. As an alternative to the expensive and resource-demanding endoscopic surveillance, the Cytosponge has been developed to sample the esophageal mucosa efficiently. The device is a compressed mesh sponge encapsulated in an ingestible gelatin pill attached to a string. After swallowing, the capsule dissolves allowing the sponge to expand in the stomach. As it is pulled out, cells are collected from the esophagogastric junction and throughout the esophagus. The cellular samples can be analyzed by cytology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular markers. We conducted a systematic review of all recent relevant studies to help define the role of this novel technology, including studies of screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous dysplasia detection, detection of eosinophilic esophagitis, and evaluation of benign esophageal diseases. With the major limitation that most studies were performed by a single investigative group that developed the technology, the device yielded overall impressive results against the endoscopy/biopsy gold standard. Patient acceptability was high. If these promising early results are validated by other investigators in other populations, the Cytosponge represents an important new advance in the detection of esophageal pathology that could potentially decrease the burden of endoscopic esophageal sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30044236     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  10 in total

Review 1.  Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Existing and Upcoming Therapies in an Age of Emerging Molecular and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ian F Slack; Justin T Schwartz; Vincent A Mukkada; Shawna Hottinger; J Pablo Abonia
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Role of TFF3 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus using a minimally invasive esophageal sampling device-The CytospongeTM.

Authors:  Anna L Paterson; Marcel Gehrung; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Maria O'Donovan
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 3.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom… In Barrett's Surveillance.

Authors:  Pauline A Zellenrath; Carlijn A M Roumans; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 4.  Noninvasive tests for eosinophilic esophagitis: Ready for use?

Authors:  Emily C McGowan; Seema S Aceves
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 6.248

Review 5.  Impact of the Tumor Microenvironment for Esophageal Tumor Development-An Opportunity for Prevention?

Authors:  Martin Borgmann; Michael Quante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Acceptability and Adequacy of a Non-endoscopic Cell Collection Device for Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Srinadh Komanduri; V Raman Muthusamy; Sachin Wani; Maria O'Donovan; Rajinder Kaushal; John M Haydek
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Screening for Barrett's Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?

Authors:  Aisha Yusuf; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-16

8.  Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial.

Authors:  Roberta Maroni; Jessica Barnes; Judith Offman; Fiona Scheibl; Samuel G Smith; Irene Debiram-Beecham; Jo Waller; Peter Sasieni; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Greg Rubin; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Expanding beyond endoscopy: A review of non-invasive modalities in Barrett's esophagus screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Dariush Shahsavari; Praneeth Kudaravalli; John Erikson L Yap; Kenneth J Vega
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 5.374

10.  Computational pathology aids derivation of microRNA biomarker signals from Cytosponge samples.

Authors:  Neus Masqué-Soler; Marcel Gehrung; Cassandra Kosmidou; Xiaodun Li; Izzuddin Diwan; Conor Rafferty; Elnaz Atabakhsh; Florian Markowetz; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.143

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.