| Literature DB >> 35814600 |
Peng Zhao1, Fei Xue2, Xipeng Zhang1.
Abstract
Fast-running ability is a very important basic quality of football players. However, players are dynamic. It is difficult for coaches to grasp the running speed, instantaneous acceleration, and other indicators of small athletes in real time with the naked eye. Therefore, to accurately test the performance of athletes in fast-running ability, this paper studies the running ability mining model of football coaches based on the dynamic incremental clustering algorithm. According to scientific procedures and methods, the evaluation model and standard of running ability of Chinese elite female football players are established. The effectiveness of the model is 0.83, as verified by the standard recognition method, which shows that the evaluation model is efficient. The research considers the denoising of the original data. The model has rich data and standard test methods and procedures. It can be used as a measure of the running ability of China's elite female football players in a certain period and range. The research solves the problem of the insufficient running ability of domestic football players. It provides an important reference for training the next generation of excellent national football players.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814600 PMCID: PMC9259255 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3255886
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Running ability model of football match.
Intraclass and interclass differences of different clustering results when threshold ε is input.
| Threshold | Maximum diameter in cluster | Minimum cluster diameter | Average cluster diameter | Maximum difference between clusters | Minimum difference between clusters | Average value of difference between clusters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6 | 2.851 | 2.542 | 2.674 | 2.671 | 2.354 | 2.467 |
| 0.7 | 2.842 | 2.541 | 2.652 | 2.686 | 2.361 | 2.484 |
| 0.8 | 2.872 | 2.535 | 2.633 | 2.714 | 2.386 | 2.551 |
| 1 | 2.821 | 2.531 | 2.662 | 2.622 | 2.312 | 2.461 |
| 1.1 | 2.814 | 2.531 | 2.624 | 2.762 | 2.403 | 2.683 |
Statistics of defender's running formballplayer.
| Ballplayer | Average per game | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slow running time (min) | Slow running distance (km) | Medium running time (min) | Medium distance (km) | Fast-running time (min) | Fast-running distance (km) | 90 min fastest running speed/(km/h) | |
| Ramos | 50.56 | 5.52 | 5.28 | 1.48 | 6.42 | 2.82 | 26.71 |
| Kapu devilla | 53.28 | 5.84 | 5.01 | 1.47 | 5.42 | 2.46 | 26.08 |
| Simon van der Meer | 52.41 | 5.91 | 5.81 | 1.71 | 6.61 | 2.38 | 26.23 |
| Fusile | 51.52 | 5.42 | 4.62 | 1.35 | 6.22 | 2.61 | 24.82 |
| Mattheiszen | 55.16 | 5.92 | 4.82 | 1.38 | 4.66 | 1.88 | 26.21 |
List of basic value models of evaluation indicators.
| Movement form | Forward | Midfielder | Guard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprint run | 254 | 161 | 134 |
| High-speed running | 551 | 462 | 377 |
| Medium-speed running | 677 | 343 | 356 |
| Total distance | 569 | 608 | 626 |
Statistical table of running distance of avant-garde players.
| Ballplayer | Location | Competition time/min | Average per game | Maximum running distance of 90 min/km | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total running distance/km | Running distance of the ball/km | No ball running distance/km | ||||
| Harvey | Qianyao | 635 | 11.45 | 5.55 | 3.58 | 12.31 |
| Sneijder | Qianyao | 651 | 10.46 | 4.24 | 3.86 | 10.81 |
| Sergi Busquets Burgos | Small of the back | 632 | 10.21 | 4.23 | 3.92 | 10.83 |
| Khedira | Small of the back | 607 | 12.21 | 4.74 | 4.62 | 12.26 |
List of comprehensive evaluation grade standards.
| Forward | Midfielder | Guard | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Superior | >17.7 | >14.2 | >17.3 |
| Medium and superior | 17.7–15 | 14.2–12.7 | 17.3–13.4 |
| Secondary | 15.8–10.2 | 12.6–7.7 | 13.5–6.8 |
| Middle and lower-class | 11–8.3 | 7.8–6.3 | 6.7–3.4 |
| Inferior | <8.1 | <6.3 | <3.4 |
Comparison between students' physical fitness and sports standards.
| Speed | Project | 30 m | 50 m | 100 m |
| Standard | 3″8 | 6″ | 12″2 | |
| Selected students | 4″1 | 6″3 | 12″6 | |
|
| ||||
| Endurance | Project | 1000 m | 1500 m | 3200 m |
| Standard | 3′04′ | 5′01″ | 12′03″ | |
| Selected students | 3′14″ | 5′24″ | 14′16″ | |
|
| ||||
| Force | Project | Pull-ups (pieces) | Throw a solid ball (M) | 50 kg weight-bearing station squat (times/minute) |
| Standard | 24 | 13.52 | 21 | |
| Selected students | 15 | 11.22 | 14 | |
Figure 2Selection results of evaluation index experts.
Figure 3Selection results of evaluation index experts.
Figure 4Selection results of evaluation index experts.
Figure 5Grade evaluation standard of single evaluation index.