Literature DB >> 7742840

Effects of a semirigid and softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on selected performance tests among high school football players.

K Macpherson1, M Sitler, I Kimura, M Horodyski.   

Abstract

No prophylactic ankle stabilizer performance study has been conducted to date using high school football players, ie., players who are at risk of ankle sprains. In addition, the effect that prophylactic ankle stabilizer use has on performance by player position is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a semirigid and softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on performance by football player position in events testing vertical jump, speed, and agility. Twenty-five high school football players participated in the study. All subjects denied any history of ankle injury within 1 year of the study and previous experience with prophylactic ankle stabilizer use. Subjects completed three tests [vertical jump, 36.56-m (40-yd) sprint, and 18.28-m (20-yd) shuttle run] under three different ankle treatments: Aircast SportStirrup, DonJoy RocketSoc, and nonbraced control. Results of the study indicated that the Aircast SportStirrup and DonJoy RocketSoc, when compared with a nonbraced control, had no significant effect on vertical jump, 36.56-m (40-yd) sprint, and 18.28-m (20-yd) shuttle run performance. Skill players had faster 36.56-m (40-yd) sprint times than strength players regardless of ankle treatment. In conclusion, the Aircast SportStirrup and DonJoy RocketSoc did not facilitate or adversely affect performance involving vertical jump, speed, and agility of high school football players.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7742840     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.3.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  15 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors.

Authors:  G D McKay; P A Goldie; W R Payne; B W Oakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains.

Authors:  Seda Bicici; Nihan Karatas; Gul Baltaci
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

6.  Ankle taping does not impair performance in jump or balance tests.

Authors:  Javier Abián-Vicén; Luis M Alegre; J Manuel Fernández-Rodríguez; Amador J Lara; Marta Meana; Xavier Aguado
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  The effect of kinesio® tape on vertical jump and dynamic postural control.

Authors:  Mikiko A Nakajima; Carolann Baldridge
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

8.  The effects of two adhesive ankle-taping methods on strength, power, and range of motion in female athletes.

Authors:  Katherine E Quackenbush; Paula R J Barker; Shauna M Stone Fury; David G Behm
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-02

Review 9.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Rehabilitation of the Ankle After Acute Sprain or Chronic Instability.

Authors:  Carl G Mattacola; Maureen K Dwyer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.